278 pointsby robotswantdata6 hours ago34 comments
  • lambda2 hours ago
    Tried out the simulator and was surprised to find that the movement keys are ZQSD; then realized that's the equivalent of WASD on an AZERTY keyboard. Checked and sure enough, Pollen Robotics is a French company.

    They may want to at least add a preference for keyboard layout, pretty sure that QWERTY and QWERTZ are much more common worldwide than AZERTY.

    • magimasan hour ago
      At least my QUERTZ layout also works as expected in the simulator. You use WASD to move the duck, Q and E to kick left and right etc.

      I think it's just the splash screen they didn't properly localize.

    • echelon2 hours ago
      > Pollen Robotics is a French company

      Acquired by HuggingFace, a French-American company.

      Acquired by Nvidia, an American company.

      • natpalmer1776an hour ago
        All roads lead to uh… America I guess?
        • m12k28 minutes ago
          Wherever the capital is (so yes, America)
  • _joel4 hours ago
    It's either this or https://mondorobotics.com/ and I'm torn. Obviously it's for my daughter and I will just be safety checking, definitely, 100%.
    • Philip-J-Fry3 hours ago
      That's a completely different class of robot. The Beni robot is just a toy, it's just connect the app and drive it around, record videos and do some fancy tricks like flips. It is not meant to be a platform you program yourself.

      The Microduck is meant to be a hacker toy. Train it yourself, write software, hack it, etc.

      It depends what you're trying to get for your daughter. Is it something to get her into robotics? Then probably the Microduck is the way. If it's literally just a toy, then the Beni robot is better because that's literally all it is.

      • asadm2 hours ago
        The creators of Beni seem to have promised that the platform will be open (including sim2real parts of Beni).

        I have ordered Beni for my family. It's sturdy and more practical for careless fun.

      • _joel3 hours ago
        yes to both :)
    • monkeydust2 hours ago
      I got this for my kids https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/doly/doly-more-than-a-r... earlier this year (after a much longer than expected wait on Kickstarter)...was good for a bit and had some fun but mostly gathering dust now. Occasionally will come out if friends are over.
    • neom3 hours ago
      MKBHD covered Beni the other day and it looks like a super super fun toy. Not sure about the educational value, but I was thinking about getting one for the kid in my life (me). https://youtu.be/mfmdXPT7nAM?t=592 (9:52)
    • lumost3 hours ago
      As a kick-starter project is this thing actually real? My experience with kick-starter has been that the projects are almost universally faked.
      • _joel3 hours ago
        totally, it's on MKBKD video posted in other comments. I watched it last week and hence why I'm split
      • reaperduceran hour ago
        As a kick-starter project is this thing actually real? My experience with kick-starter has been that the projects are almost universally faked.

        I've only contributed to three kickstarters, and they all worked out well. But I think I'm more selective than most people, and generally don't jump on something until it's already been fully funded by other people.

    • serf3 hours ago
      I believe the Microduck camera footage (the ad - reel) about 1000x more than the Mondo one.
      • quadrature3 hours ago
        For what it’s worth the mondo team has been posting development log videos on Reddit since before they incorporated. They raised money so they now have ads with more production value, but they came from small beginnings and I do trust their product.
      • vavos3 hours ago
        The mondo beni bot was featured on mkbhd recently looked to work pretty well and got a positive review, for what's that's worth [0]

        [0] - https://youtu.be/mfmdXPT7nAM

    • toasty228an hour ago
      Both are expensive e waste, companies come up every 5 years with these "house robots for kids", they're used for about 5 days, I've seen the cycle many times already
      • random3an hour ago
        Makes sense. Unless you can disassemble/reassemble. I guess selling kits (Meccano, Technics) would be the better approach. I recall countless hours building stuff and my kids love their Magnetiles and everything that lets them build in a free-form.
    • unglaublich3 hours ago
      Will Beni/monodorobotics have open source software, or at least a hackable stack?
      • amelius3 hours ago
        Hey we're on HN where __anything__ is hackable :)

        (Except iDevices of course)

  • prometheus1992an hour ago
    Not sure many people know this - most of the robotics stuff that you see in the news is based on MujoCo (Multi-Joint dynamics with Contact) engine, that is used primarily to create simulated environments in which these robots learn the RL policies. This project is maintained by Google deepmind - https://github.com/google-deepmind/mujoco
  • trebligdivad2 hours ago
    Oh so this is why Nvidia (edit: trying to buy)/bought Hugging Face, $1B for all the ai sharing and stuff, and $12B for the duck!
  • telecuda3 hours ago
    It doesn't walk like a duck, but Reachy Mini by HF/Pollen Robotics is a great entry-level robot. And you get to assemble it!

    Direct links: https://pollen-robotics.com/microduck/ https://pollen-robotics.com/reachy-mini/

    • jamesponddotco2 hours ago
      I use one to control my house with Home Assistant. It's pretty great, and it was a lot of fun to assemble.
      • lagrange772 hours ago
        Sounds interesting, could you elaborate on what you do with?
        • jamesponddotcoan hour ago
          Not much to say, really; it controls my house in Home Assistant using an LLM, and a STT/TTS server. It acts as the Home Assistant Voice Preview Edition, with a trigger word and whatnot.

          It's basically like giving an Alexa, Siri, or Gemini a body. It moves, show "emotions", comments when someone enter the room, uses the camera to see who entered the room and comment on that, make comments when my 3D printer finishes, things like that.

          I can also turn on lights, the TV, the AC, ask about the weather, and other basic assistant stuff, ofc.

  • NalNezumian hour ago
    Surprised with the price, a similar form factor that I know of is even more expensive https://shop.xgorobot.com/products/xgo-rider-world-s-first-d...

    (Chinese but since it's esp32 and raspberry pi it is possible to tinker with it)

    I wonder what's the catch? Cheap IMU/motors?

  • LeafItAlonean hour ago
    That page is… a lot, on mobile.

    Here’s the tech specs page, which is also busy: https://pollen-robotics.com/microduck/press-kit/

  • utopiah4 hours ago
    for microduck I didn't find but their older reachy_miny was Apache 2.0 and hardware design files as Creative Commons BY-SA-NC
  • amelius4 hours ago
    Waiting for robot vacuum cleaners to come with extension ports where you can add fun robot actuators.
    • alnwlsnan hour ago
      Old Roombas used to come with a serial port so you could use drive the motors and use it as a robot base. Then, you stick a wireless router and a webcam on top - no raspberry pi in those days.
    • ricardobayes2 hours ago
      I have already added googly eyes to mine to give it a bit of a flair. It's hilarious to watch it roam around.
  • ibbtown37 minutes ago
    Does it work locally? I don't want to have a camera robot in child's room
    • robotswantdata7 minutes ago
      Yes! At least Reachy can be run fully offline so don’t see why Ducky can’t
  • martianvoid4 hours ago
    This actually seems awesome, just going through the video on their site made me burst out with 100 different ways in which I would tinker with it, spend time in learning different gaits, some RL or some tricks to have it jump or do a back flip

    I can see some parallel between how arduino gave hobbyist a mini computer they can use in any way imaginable, I can see this kind of thing being used to solve unimaginable problems by hobbyist or RL computer scientist or heck any UG student with claude subscription

  • bilateran hour ago
    I think in the future we'll have robot pets and look back in horror at how we enslaved animals out of their natural habitats and normalized (even glorified) it.
    • onestay42an hour ago
      What about the animals that have been domesticated to be pets? It's arguable that their native habitat is the home at this point. Although, I do hope we stop capturing the animals which aren't domesticated (most "exotic" pets).
    • LeafItAlonean hour ago
      Interesting how all of the replies so far to your comment assume we’d just release the existing animals into the wild instead of just not breeding more.
    • geoffmanningan hour ago
      I agree with the horror of pulling animals out of their natural habitat, but if you are using this as a blanket statement towards all living animals then you should read up on the history of the domestication of wolves (dogs). It was born of a beneficial relationship to both humans and wolves and i personally find my relationship with my dogs to be extremely fulfilling and i believe my dogs do as well.

      I have no interest in a relationship with a robot.

      • bilater37 minutes ago
        I know the history. We bred them to be our pets and normalized this relationship. Your pet might even love his life. But we can do the same with robot AIs, and it will be a better relationship. Your robot can talk to you. It can call 911 if you’re in trouble instead of just barking.
    • swiftcoderan hour ago
      > look back in horror at how we enslaved animals out of their natural habitats

      Somehow, vegan-inclined folks never seem to factor in the mass-genocide of domestic breeds that is necessary to achieve their particular utopia. We're talking 1.5 billion pets, 5 billion livestock, and 28 billion poultry - none of which are remotely able to survive on their own in the wild.

      • bilater41 minutes ago
        I detest the vegan movement. I'm not an animal lover. Pets are unsanitary nuisances. Robots are better. We don't need to commit a genocide against domestic pets for the transition. Just breed less.
    • phplovesongan hour ago
      Release the dogs and cats! You are free to roam! Ill think i need to buy dogg pound stock!
  • 59percentmorean hour ago
    It's not worth it if you can't have a swarm of them that debate philosophy in their off time.
    • threethirtytwoan hour ago
      Who says you can’t have a swarm
      • 9dev16 minutes ago
        Certainly not OpenAI, the swarm is evolving under their roof as we speak
  • k3liutZu5 hours ago
    My wife would love one of these.

    She's still bitter we didn't get the Sony dog a decade ago.

    • raudette2 hours ago
      I remember it being the 90s :) the first generation AIBO was discontinued TWO decades ago.

      (it does look like subsequent models were launched about a decade ago)

      • coreyh144442 hours ago
        Yep. I was at a dotcom (ZEFER) back then and we owned an OG AIBO robot for the office. This was 1999 I'm pretty sure.
  • cwizan hour ago
    I couldn’t find hardware open source. If only I could 3d print and build it myself, that would be hell of a project.
  • cs19965 hours ago
    this looks 100x better than Casio's https://www.casio.com/us/moflin/
    • ricardobayes2 hours ago
      It's a different target market I guess. I welcome innovation like this - it's possibly tackling the loneliness epidemic in however small ways.
      • nancyminusonean hour ago
        its a cool toy, not a friend. The only way you "bond" with plastic is with some ScotchWeld.
    • utopiah4 hours ago
      This "with emotions like a living creature" should just not be allowed.
      • kodoman4 hours ago
        why not?
        • dgellow4 hours ago
          Because it’s a lie. And is pushing for even worse sycophantic products

          > Emotional AI Support, Powered by Intelligence

          Targeting emotionally vulnerable people with AI promises is pretty disgusting

          • Isamu3 hours ago
            How about “this duck fakes positive emotions like we all do from time to time”
          • tokai4 hours ago
            Years ago I worked with developmentally disabled people, that absolutely loved animals but could never be left alone with one much less own one. This kind of product would have brought so much joy to those people.
            • forgetfreeman2 hours ago
              I think it's distasteful to screen ethically questionable business practices with segments of the disabled community. If this product was being marketed towards the need of developmentally disabled individuals I feel like there would be less grounds for criticism, however meeting those needs in no way excuses outright fabrication of marketing claims aimed at the broader consumer market, and especially children.
              • tokai2 hours ago
                You find something you made up distasteful? Get a grip. Its just a Furby.
            • dgellow4 hours ago
              I don’t deny there is a market for it
          • kodoman4 hours ago
            Honestly I feel that way for the whole AI friend industry that is developing, from AI boyfriends and girlfriends to just kind of AI 'friends'. But this sort of thing is a sort of robot pet and I think the dynamics are different. Some one replacing a robot cat with a cat is not an evil thing in the way that trying to substitute human relationships are.
            • dgellow4 hours ago
              I agree, just don’t lie about it. You can present it as a cute little robot pet without problems. No need to say “it expresses and feels emotions like a real cat”. The AI industry has normalized lying about your products to a whole new level, that shouldn’t be acceptable
              • kodoman3 hours ago
                Looking through the advertising.

                > Through communication, Moflin’s emotional state changes. Your robot companion can show joy, sadness, and happiness, reacting just like a living creature would. Moflin does not possess actual emotions like humans do. Their emotional expressions are simulated by AI. And lots of bits of the advert seems to be explain how it's not real in the QA and that everything is a simulation.

                I have not used the product, but nothing strikes me as dishonest about the advertising.

                • andrewfromx2 hours ago
                  i bought one about a year ago and used it for 20 days or so. Then I realised casio offered a full money back return for 30 days. And sorry little moflin your emotions were not real enough for me to want to keep you vs get $400 back.
                  • kodoman2 hours ago
                    They do look cute, but $400 is steep.
                • ForHackernews3 hours ago
                  > Your robot companion can show joy, sadness, and happiness, reacting just like a living creature would.

                  Seems like a lie to me. Compare:

                  > Our synthetic foodstuffs can taste sweet, salty, tart or tangy, delicious flavors just like natural ingredients.

                  (But then it's all aspartame, etc.)

                  • kodoman3 hours ago
                    I guess we are really debating the semantics of the sentences now like lawyers but to me the verb show is not particularly difficult to achieve or ambitious or misleading to use in this sort of product. A toy with a that has a smiley face and a frowning face is capable of showing two different emotions.

                    Your second one point also does not seem like a lie to me since it's claiming to emulate natural ingredient (although here I guess to be just like means to emulate perfectly).

                    I don't really see why any one would look at the product and it's marketing as evil. It seems to me aimed at people who can not have pets and are want to create a simulation of a soothing positive interaction with a pet. I don't see this as exploitative (apart from it's exploiting a desire that people have in the same way that virtually all products do), I can not see someone forming a relationship with this to the detriment of human interaction or exacerbate some kind of mental illness or cause addiction. It does seem a little expensive and that would be my only criticism of the product so far as I can see.

    • tokai4 hours ago
      Its not even close to being the same product.
    • ahoka3 hours ago
      Finally an AI slop I can keep as a pet. I hate this dystopia.
  • Zylokloto3 hours ago
    Basic great usecase (not just fun things): IF you can control it remote, you can check your flat if you are gone for a little bit longer.
    • ricardobayes2 hours ago
      Yeah, totally, it could even scale the stairs if needed. How about battery life though, can it go to sleep then be woken up on demand?
      • giarc2 hours ago
        Or can it dock itself on a charger?

        It appears to have a battery pack so a docking station is unlikely but hopefully can design and open source something.

        • regularfryan hour ago
          The easiest route is probably to have it sit with its back to a Qi charger pad, with the coils in a sort of cape over the battery. Not much added weight for the coils, and quite a neat little intro project to get it to align itself and sit correctly.
      • nunodonatoan hour ago
        climbing stairs was my first question. But looking at its size, I dont think it will be able to
  • ameliusan hour ago
    Did anyone get programming in the simulator to work?

    And why don't they show the video feed as seen by the camera?

  • anentropic2 hours ago
    How much does it cost to train a new behaviour?
  • mobeets25 minutes ago
    I genuinely could not tell if this was a parody/satire or not, I think because the aesthetic reminds me of how a product like this would be presented in a horror movie or something
  • musha68k2 hours ago
    Perfect for kids; especially great that it doesn't come with a display by default.
  • Mxbonn4 hours ago
    This looks really cool! The cuteness of the demo alone makes me want one. Ideally I would also love for it to have a real use case in my home but right now I really cant think of one.
  • cekanoni2 hours ago
    It looks cool no doubt, but i would be concerned about privacy.
    • robotswantdata6 minutes ago
      If it’s anything like Reachy, can run it fully offline inc inference
    • nater50002 hours ago
      Well all of the operations are local and on-board, so unless you explicitly send your data somewhere, privacy shouldn't be a concern.
  • ge962 hours ago
    that's so cute how it roller skates
  • Depurator4 hours ago
    neat! since its written in rust, why not use https://github.com/eclipse-iceoryx/iceoryx2 for ipc?
    • Philip-J-Fry3 hours ago
      Because now you're locked into the Rust ecosystem.

      JSONRPC over Unix sockets is a better interface for language agnostic IPC.

  • unprovable5 hours ago
    Cute, and quite something if the sim-to-real pipeline is as smooth as we all might hope.
  • tietjens5 hours ago
    What is the battery life?
    • world2vec4 hours ago
      1 hour according to the spec sheet. Would be nice if it knew battery was running out and "sat" on a wireless charger by itself.
      • NitpickLawyer3 hours ago
        Since it's programmable, I guess one could tinker with it to do just that?
    • amelius4 hours ago
      And can it walk back to a charge station and hook itself up?
      • dv_dt4 hours ago
        Add a hack to repurpose a phone wireless charger pad?
        • amelius4 hours ago
          My main question is if it would be able to find its way back.
          • _flux3 hours ago
            The biggest idea of this device seems to be that people would be able to write software to it, so this seems very likely to be in the domain of achievable things, because it has a camera and LIDAR.
      • tenuousemphasis4 hours ago
        You can train it to do pretty much anything.
        • amelius3 hours ago
          You can train deep learning to do anything. But the question is ... will it do it? And the next question: how reliably?
  • jCalamari5 hours ago
    AI is coming for pet market too.
    • amelius4 hours ago
      AI is taking all the fun jobs. Now also for pets.
      • teiferer3 hours ago
        Don't believe that all pet animals are having a great life.

        Many people with a dog don't get that as a pack animal it's cruel to leave it alone indoors all day, they overfeed them and keep them alive well beyond the stage where some hip/back/joint pain issues would keep it in constant pain. Cats are the opposite, people get them "a companion" so it doesn't feel "alone", yet in reality, in addition to also being way overfed, there is now constant warfare in the house cause cats (that are not directly blood related) actually hate each other, another word for being territorial. "Oh look how cute they are playing with each other, chasing through the house!" Yeah no, it's Hunger Games day in day out. Other species don't fare better, from turtles living in their own s*it to birds who never can fly. We are very cruel to our pets, often too ignorant to notice, with exceptions being much too rare.

        I welcome those pets being replaced by robots.

        • threethirtytwo43 minutes ago
          Naw bro. These pets are domesticated. They are evolving via natural selection to be suited for living in houses, they already pretty much can’t live in the wild.

          Also the dog would rather be alive than not alive at all and which is what will happen if you replace it with AI. You don’t shoot an old person just because he has hip pain.

  • lrvick2 hours ago
    Now that Nvidia owns huggingface, I fear their days being able to support open source products are over.
  • Gannon67904 hours ago
    I'm wanna train some to chase after turtles.
  • tamimio3 hours ago
    I hope it’s not built on ROS or rely on it in any way!

    Also kudos for bringing the joy of robotics back, since now most companies are riding the “defense” bandwagon and all robot companies I know suddenly are defense companies and visiting their sites is like the most dystopian thing ever, making it harder to find contract/jobs for people who want to make robotics for good not killing machines.

  • SomeonesAccount4 hours ago
    That is sick
  • snalty4 hours ago
    Ugh, PAL only? I'll wait for the NTSC version.
  • grommz2 hours ago
    Made in China with a 500% markup. No thanks, I will wait for the Chinese version for less than $100.