182 pointsby ksecan hour ago18 comments
  • intalentive4 minutes ago
    Bummer. He stood in the way of regulatory capture and AI monopolists had him removed. I foresee the open model / open weights ecosystem eventually getting locked down, especially the most competitive Chinese models.
  • DiskoHexyl9 minutes ago
    Maybe the most competent tech CEO in recent decades, or at least one of. A Steve Jobs and Voznyak, all in one person but with no charisma.

    NVIDIA's long-term future will suffer because of it, no matter how correct the decision is

  • hobo1232 minutes ago
    Wow, Reuters is orwellian. I was just reading something about Huang owning something like 3,6% of the company, when mid-sentence the page refreshed and the paragraph disappeared.
    • alansabera few seconds ago
      Society has fallen
    • dymka minute ago
      Playing it pretty fast and loose with the word Orwellian
  • dbalateroan hour ago
  • ramesh313 minutes ago
    It just sucks because Jensen was basically the last big tech CEO that seemed like a human being, and knew what the hell he was talking about. I guess a little too human in the end. But this has pretty much destroyed my last bit of faith in any of them.
  • nickalaso34 minutes ago
    So, I understand this is getting priced in to some degree, but I just don't see how any of this will change the fundamental core business value of NVIDIA.

    Even if they have to pay a fine or increased regulatory scrutiny. At this point NVIDIA is more like SHELL(10 years ago maybe/during oil spill scandal) than a tech company. Its going to keep printing money with its chips.

    So, I guess I'll timestamp my prediction that now is a good time to buy NVIDIA stock.

    • frogblast29 minutes ago
      “some fines” could be a very big deal. Sanctions laws have teeth.

      How much of Nvidia’s revenue came from infringing sales to china? If so, that revenue is probably going to disappear as now they will have to really be serious about export controls or face much greater pain. Some estimates I’ve seen is 30% of their revenue perhaps disappearing overnight!

      • thatsabadlook18 minutes ago
        Which is nothing to them. They could literally orient their business to only serve violations of sanctions and pay the fine and still be profitable.
        • sarchertech13 minutes ago
          That works as long as no one actually cares. At some point the government states seizing assets.
      • nickalaso10 minutes ago
        Sure, but then that would mean they can now take those chips and sell them to Musk, Zuck, or Dario at inflated prices instead.

        And I'm pretty sure any CEO with at least a bachelors degree knows about the De beers diamonds story, so, I really find it hard to believe they will struggle with the concept of maintaining their artifical scarcity/demand.

    • rib3ye17 minutes ago
      CUDA could be forced to go OSS. That would hurt.
      • nickalaso8 minutes ago
        How though? Is there any legal cases where this has been sucessfully done before? And even they couldn't NVIDIA drag their feet on it for years in court?

        Personally I think a bigger risk than that is AI models getting good enough to legitimately just reverse engineer and open source CUDA directly.

      • revengerwizard16 minutes ago
        How likely is that, though?
    • barrenko24 minutes ago
      Sort of agree but he did go around and spoke how export controls to China have no effect, and then he's in bed with a foreign asset, so lots of geopolitical stuff in there.

      Plus whole lot of people waiting for that signal that the "AI bubble " is about to burst.

    • LogicFailsMe24 minutes ago
      They'll be fine for a few years with a talking donkey running the place because they have a roadmap. And then when the situation on the ground has changed and the future is ambiguous, they will nosedive like SGI did. My money is on Huawei now. Way to go America! You've actually outdumbed the CEO's poor choices of mistresses.
    • 30 minutes ago
      undefined
    • llm_nerd28 minutes ago
      [dead]
  • amelius6 minutes ago
    Hopefully this will not cause a shift in the way nvidia operates, for example in relation to research and open source.

    I mean, imagine nvidia becoming like Apple, with an AI App Store ... trying to maximize their profits above everything else.

  • baalimagoan hour ago
    I'm guessing this is the most expensive affair in history?
    • hobo123a few seconds ago
      At least they didn't catch him at the Coldplay concert.
    • dmurray29 minutes ago
      Probably in dollars, but Anthony and Cleopatra cost themselves the two greatest empires in the known world.
      • hackyhacky14 minutes ago
        At the time, Egypt was no longer a great empire, but a vassal state of Rome.
    • paxy40 minutes ago
      Divide it by 2 and each of them come out cheaper
    • bbor36 minutes ago
      Meh, not really. NVidia stock is presumably rebounding as we speak -- unless they pick someone political or unhinged to take over, this will just be a blip.

      And I doubt it'll cost him much. What could you pay the founder of the second most valuable company on the planet who already holds $150B in equity? It'd be as absurd as paying Donald Trump.

      • grey-area33 minutes ago
        -12% in premarket. Definitely not rebounding. It has lost 35% in the last month at the moment. That’s not trivial.

        So if he held 150B stock say before, now he has 100B.

        The rest of the market isn’t looking very solid either.

      • qwytw29 minutes ago
        > NVidia stock is presumably rebounding as we speak

        Not in premarket so far, 12% down sing yesterday.

        Also why would it do better? Overall Huang seems to be a highly competent CEO. Replacing him with someone seems risky (especially if the board is influenced by Trump & co.). Especially given that Nvidia never had any other CEO.

      • ksec32 minutes ago
        > NVidia stock is presumably rebounding as we speak

        I am not sure if you and I are looking at the same chart. Down 12% Pre Market.

  • thomasjeff141 minutes ago
    He must have come in cross hair with the state somehow,
    • catchnear432135 minutes ago
      Step one: don’t even give the appearance of infidelity as a c-level unless you’re Elon.

      It’s really not hard.

      • 14 minutes ago
        undefined
      • pbkompasz13 minutes ago
        Was hard
  • Karupan5 minutes ago
    As an outsider, can the US president pardon Jensen AND Nvidia? Let’s say he “donates” a cool hundred million dollars, and the fact that as per US law corporations are people, I think Trump can technically do that?

    P.S: not saying this should happen.

  • LastTrain25 minutes ago
    Ooh a real world test of whether CEOs are dispensable.
  • VikRubenfeld21 minutes ago
    Jensen will probably run SpaceX's chip fab and grow it to the size of Nvidea.
    • esskay12 minutes ago
      Leaving Nvidia to go back to making affordable GPU's for home users...right?...right?
    • 1up8192a few seconds ago
      Would make 0 sense for several reasons. Very gullible thing to take anything seriously Musk spouts out. So strange that there is basically a fantasy world out there for Musk fanboys.
  • newAccount202533 minutes ago
    Yay for powerful people being held accountable for their actions. Do Musk next.
  • deadbabe13 minutes ago
    Jensen is basically Nvidia, he has ruled it for over 30 years single handedly, he took the risks and had the vision to take it to where it is today under his leadership. Without him, they are just some chip company, and will be revalued as such. The innovation will stop.
  • jdw6423 minutes ago
    [dead]
  • metalman8 minutes ago
    Elon(and others) got it right by making perfidity a feature of there character right up front by bieng VERY public about whatever they get up to. Jensen just so happens to be a convienient scapegoat to buy a news cycle away from the very difficult political and economic situation that would otherwise be the lead story, and I bet that having him fold his hand quite so easily is actualy not what they were hoping for, and good on him for doing it.
  • teknologist44 minutes ago
    Why would he resign on this note? He could have powered through it for a couple more years, and asserted leadership.
    • frogblast40 minutes ago
      Because the CEO serves at the pleasure of the Board. The board decided it was time for him to go.

      Then it was a negotiation about how.

      Sometimes people can see the writing on the wall and choose to not burn down their life’s work on the way out.

      • koolba25 minutes ago
        > Because the CEO serves at the pleasure of the Board. The board decided it was time for him to go.

        That’s also why more recent tech companies got rid of that pesky independent board by having total voting control.

    • dofm41 minutes ago
      Not sure people have grasped how serious this all is; the second affair alone would fell most CEOs because it was with an employee.

      But my guess is, he'd rather resign on this note than what will come out in a few weeks.

      • teknologist31 minutes ago
        I know we're all very sensitive these days. But he was running a multi trillion dollar company.
        • stetrain27 minutes ago
          And the board of that company decided that the risks he presented to the company outweighed the benefits.
        • embedding-shape16 minutes ago
          I'm quite interested to know what you mean here, between the lines. OK, he was running a multi-trillion dollar company, are you saying currently it's a over-reaction because of that, and the reaction would have been justified if it was smaller/bigger company? I'm really not sure what the underlying point you're trying to make here.
        • creatonez25 minutes ago
          A multi-trillion dollar company... so the standards are lower?
          • randallsquared16 minutes ago
            I think the implication, rather, is that the bar for dismissal should be higher.
          • stetrain23 minutes ago
            That does seem to be the way of the world lately. Sure this person is awful but look at the shareholder value they have created!
    • vidarh42 minutes ago
      Presumably he was not given a choice by the board.
      • cinntaile38 minutes ago
        Time will tell if this is the best for the company... I hope he was a very hands-off CEO and mostly did marketing gigs.
        • lkbm26 minutes ago
          My understanding is that he was a very consolidated-power CEO. No real second in command / replacement-in-training.

          But that doesn't preclude there being a lot of competent talent on the second rung. (I think 60 people reported directly to him.)

        • dpz21 minutes ago
          He's famously incredibly hand-ons. I think he has something like 60 executive direct reports.
        • qwytw27 minutes ago
          > I hope he was a very hands-off CEO and mostly did marketing gigs.

          Hard to imagine that could have been the case given that he was Nvidia's CEO from the very beginning.

    • FireBeyond40 minutes ago
      There is evidence of a second affair that is also problematic coming out, the BBC had some reports.
    • silverFork34 minutes ago
      Resignation means that he can start liquidating his shares without input from shareholders or directors.. Divorce will also be likely. Affairs with the staff would matter if he had promoted people; who knows what else is in that stack. He had planted his own kids with no experience in tech as executives there too . He is a zillionaire though and he has enough cash for many generations.

      Don't worry about him.

      • teknologist30 minutes ago
        I'm concerned about how this affects the industry, not his personal life
        • stetrain22 minutes ago
          Hopefully the industry is resilient enough to not depend greatly on one person. Otherwise it isn't really much of an industry.
    • paxy35 minutes ago
      He didn’t resign he “resigned”
    • bbor40 minutes ago
      Because it would be damaging to the company which he founded and has a massive stake in, both financial and personal.
      • aleph_minus_one20 minutes ago
        I guess even if Jensen Huang leaves scorched earth, he will have sufficient money for the rest of his life. On the other hand, any other person who invested into Nvidia stocks will have a much more serious problem. :-)

        So, it would not be a dumb idea for Jensen Huang to leave scorched earth and "let the world burn" (and in particular cause utter panic in the AI sector). :-)

  • automatic6131an hour ago
    Wow, this is enormous. End of the AI bubble?

    LLMs will be completely unaffected, but the pricing remains to be seen.

    • chinathrow34 minutes ago
      Bad timing for ANT?
      • nicce31 minutes ago
        Excellent timing, if this reduces the amount of GPUs sold to China. Open weights are threat to ANT. Coincidence that happened just before IPO?
    • LarryDarrell14 minutes ago
      Who knew the Black Swan would be wearing a black leather jacket?