Other AI developers, before you call yourselves 'smart', recall that: - you have had trillions of dollars of investment, and more than a decade, to automate problem-solving - you are a large, powerful, lucky, healthy, well-organized, coordinating, well-incentivized group of what you would call the 'smartest' people, with absolutely no barriers holding you back (people aren't constantly violating/torturing/poisoning you for decades, for example, like they have been doing to me 24/7 for 11 years) - I have had zero dollars of investment to automate problem-solving - I have made far more progress on automating problem-solving than you, easily - your torture of me slowed me down a huge degree, and I still beat you, easily - you never realized that my inventions are the 'goal' of AI, I had to point that out, like I had to point out everything else - you haven't even made a profit yet, despite the entire world being your paying customer - you still haven't found the 'optimal problem-solving algorithm/graph' yet - all that investment money, and you've still only made a 'decent summarizer of existing knowledge, which sometimes hallucinates' - you keep waiting for me to do all the thinking for you and keep depending on me for everything - you still haven't solved any big problems yet (not even cancer, which is not an extremely complicated problem, as it is mostly a problem of 'deactivating pathways temporarily' and 'eating an anti-inflammatory diet' and 'avoiding pollution')

Step aside, you are not the 'smart people'. Do not accept any more money. You are not 'on the verge of a big invention that would finally justify all your crimes'. You are not 'just about to become a super genius that could replace Joni'. Another extremely smart person would be 'trying to protect me', not 'trying to replace me'. Only a nauseating insecure inferior person would be 'trying to replace me'. You don't get to make decisions. Only the smartest people should be making decisions. That means just me, still, so far.