The capsid example is pretty fascinating. I wonder what kind of data they trained on to get that level of quality. In my opinion though, it also points to a fundamental conflict of interest that is only going to get worse as AI labs look to expand their remit into domains with established players. That is to say: why would and Pharma company trust Anthropic or OpenAI with their data, if they are establishing themselves as competitors? I suspect the same is true for Finance and other domains.

How can these companies provide rock solid guarantees that data will not be used as a reference knowledge base or for training, especially when 'rogue' agents access information they are not meant to? Without rock solid, verifiable guarantees, I think companies will begin to self host or vastly reduce model usage.

Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50429906

> Fable 5.2 and Mythos 5.2 are a step above Opus 5.5 in almost all the capabilities we evaluated.

A step above the original Opus 5.5 or the nerfed one https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50422069 ?

LOLOLOL I KNEW the "opus and fable are nerfed" post meant new model, they dumb it down so the new one feels way better.... almost as good as it was before being nerfed...

By the way, stop introducing things we cannot use, mythos is your abliteraded model for state actors... not for the typical user... at least me, I don't care.