130 pointsby joshstrangean hour ago31 comments
  • ezekg26 minutes ago
    I really do this that we are in the last years of the Internet as we know it. I daily have interactions online with people who just seem like a frontend for an LLM. Nearly every piece of content I read feels written by an LLM, and every discussion or debate ends up feeling like pitting an LLM up against another LLM. Copy, paste, copy, paste. I mean, to an extent, even tech businesses and competition (e.g. SaaS) have become LLM vs LLM in many respects. It's disheartening to witness, especially as a creative. Either we migrate from screen space back into meat space, so that original thoughts and words are at least somewhat more verifiable, or the internet fundamentally changes to use some sort of proof-of-identity and proof-of-authorship. Ideally both. But tbqh, even something like the Nets in Ender's Game won't really work in the age of AI. Either way, the internet I grew up on seems further and further away, and folks seem okay with proliferating fake realities and fake conversations and fake thoughts. It's all fake. What are we doing?
    • coldpie23 minutes ago
      If you're having daily interactions with people who feel like LLMs, then find a new community to hang out in instead. There's plenty of communities out there that reject LLM content. They're not interested in taking over the world, so they're a little harder to find, but they're out there.
      • boothby8 minutes ago
        It’s not just the tech industry. Friends of mine in non-technical fields are seeing more and more of this. If it’s in your workplace, it’s probably in most workplaces that you’re qualified to work in. You don’t "just" walk away from your community and your career.

        If you really want a firm anti-AI community with staying power, it’s looking like you will need a neo-Amish movement, complete with isolationism.

      • Forgeties797 minutes ago
        With every year those communities are becoming increasingly balkanized and building moats as they raise up the drawbridges, assuming they haven’t already atrophied from swapping over to a Facebook group years ago (now discord too, which will hurt in the long run). They are trying to protect their communities but unfortunately it has the very sad secondary effect of making it harder and harder to find them.
    • mgdev14 minutes ago
      I wonder what's next.

      We had BBSes, usenet, email, IRC, webmail, ICQ, social media of all kinds, then private communities via commercial companies (Discord, Slack).

      What does a person-to-person communication protocol that leans into LLMs (vs sees it as purely competitive or an impediment) look like?

      • benatkin5 minutes ago
        A next generation spam filter, perhaps. Rather than answer your interesting emails, the communication tool that leans into LLMs will show it to you so you can respond to it personally or have the LLM make a response that you review. And as for it being a different protocol, it would handle a lot more messages through training rules about which messages to filter, which to store long term, which to store short term, etc.
    • ericmay4 minutes ago
      > Nearly every piece of content I read feels written by an LLM, and every discussion or debate ends up feeling like pitting an LLM up against another LLM.

      This will be one of those fun new things we all have to deal with. Verifying whether someone is human or not, people suffering mental breakdowns from thinking everyone they are talking to is a bot, &c. There will be mass shooters and new murders and conspiracy theories and all sorts of things coming out of the gradual adoption of AI tooling.

      But I do hope this will help destroy the Internet in its current form. I don't think it's likely, but if it could get bad enough I hope that it destroys social media and forces people to realize even if the content is not created by a machine or an LLM, it's just as bad. T

    • tombert15 minutes ago
      I've been noticing that some coworkers are pretty clearly having an LLM manage their Slack. They'll respond back in more or less "LLM speak", and then have no idea what the fuck I'm talking about during an IRL meeting when I mention that I sent them something through Slack.

      It's maddening. These services stop being about "communicating" if information isn't actually being conveyed between two people. It's like the people attaching Claude to Slack and their email are cargo-culting the idea of communication itself.

    • gjsman-100022 minutes ago
      The very term "meat space" or "meat proxy" were terms invented by the terminally online who needed to disconnect a decade ago. Nobody sane talks or thinks like this.
      • embedding-shape17 minutes ago
        > Nobody sane talks or thinks like this

        Seems mean to me, to outright dismiss what parent says just because you feel like it's different from how you talk or think.

        I'd agree though, most people AFK don't speak or think like that, but to say no one ("sane") does is making you seem more intolerant than "spreading knowledge" or whatever you think you're doing.

      • switchbak11 minutes ago
        Do you have proof of the etymology of Meat Space? I mean other than some AI generated slop?

        My understanding is that’s a new term, unrelated to the context you’re describing.

    • uproarchat16 minutes ago
      Change the word "LLM" to "Wikipedia", and then put most of your concerns to rest. Wikipedia didn't kill the internet or make online discourse pointless, an LLM wont either, the same way calculators didn't kill napkin-math.
      • afavour5 minutes ago
        How does that work?

        > Change the word “LLM” to “tickle me Elmo”. Tickle me Elmos didn’t kill the internet or make online discourse pointless, an LLM won’t either

      • switchbak13 minutes ago
        That’s just such a terrible analogy that it’s not even wrong.
  • Aurornis6 minutes ago
    > It saddens me that what was once a rare joy and way to meet interesting people is now being abused to send cold emails.

    The cold email pitch thing has always happened, but it’s getting worse. It also depends highly on the content of your posts, with the number of cold emails varying massively depending on how much your comments look like you’re in a position to benefit someone else.

    I had to switch away from a named Hacker News account to pseudonymous handles a long time ago because the emails I was getting were becoming uncomfortably weird and personal. This was before the sharp 2026 increase in this article, so I missed that.

    Even when I didn’t put my email in my HN profile I was getting some weird responses from people who went through a lot of effort to track me down. These were stalker-ish in nature by virtue of having had to do enough internet research to find my email. The last one I received was weird enough that I started thinking before every comment about whether or not it might trigger an internet stalker, so I chose to switch accounts.

    The 2026 increase is probably multi-factorial. There are more social media gurus than ever before pitching hustle culture and cold outreach. The number of people creating startup projects and hustles has also exploded. Every meetup, user group, and group chat is now full of people working on their “startup” which means they’re having Claude build the project while they prompt their phone during work. Everyone is realizing how hard it is to get users and traction, so their attention has shifted from writing the code to hustling for traction or finding. Meetups and community Discords feel risky because the second it becomes known that I have experience and possibly connections they might help I start getting DMs or people lining up to try to become faux-friendly after the meetup for networking purposes. It’s a weird time.

  • pjungwir3 minutes ago
    Same with my open source projects and blog posts. I just woke up this morning to two spam messages:

      > Hi Paul, I saw you run Claude Code on manpj,
      > which is exactly who I built Tokenade for.
    
    and

      > Hi Paul, I read your Claude Code setup post,
      > . . . That's exactly why I built Grafizum.
    
    Gmail doesn't seem able to recognize that these are spam (or the incessant business loan offers). But I keep flagging them. I hope it hurts their delivery rates.
  • tombert32 minutes ago
    I've been having a similar problem. I have roughly the same amount of Karma here, and I used to get the occasional email about a comment and I would get kind of excited. I like engaging with people who have similar interests and as a rule I try and answer questions when people ask them of me.

    Now I'm getting a lot of emails that ostensibly are asking for follow-ups but they really just want to pitch me a shitty low-effort browser extension or or trying to rope me into some kind of weird "consulting" gig that is pretty obviously a scam.

    It makes me a little sad. Engaging with the community was something I always liked about HN and now its gotten to a point where I am probably just going to remove my email from my profile.

    • joshstrange9 minutes ago
      Exactly, getting an email about an HN comment was always a little moment of joy in the past, now I immediately switch to a skeptical "what are they trying to sell me"-mode which I really don't like. I'll keep hoping for real interactions but I also fear I will just need to adapt to the "new normal".
      • Loughla5 minutes ago
        I have everything that mentions HN set to go to spam at this point and check it once a month for kernels amongst the bullshit. For the last year, zero legit emails, all llm nonsense trying to sell me either something related to crypto or some nonsense vibe coded extension only tangentially related to whatever the topic was.

        I look forward to the email from this thread trying to sell me on an automatic filtering extension or some nonsense.

    • dachris10 minutes ago
      It's everywhere now, unfortunately. Ads, pitches, scammers now are targeting increasingly specific community information for LLM-based social engineering.

      E.g. recently a club on whose board I am was target of a quite good phishing attack, using publicly available membership information.

      I've started to write emails less polished in order to somehow signal that it's still a human writing it.

    • coldpie25 minutes ago
      Interesting. I might've received my first one of these last week, from a legit-looking gmail address. They mentioned a comment I made a month ago and immediately asked for a 20-30 minute call next week. Definitely has the "please do free labor for me" smell to it, so I declined the call but offered to have a conversation over email. No response so far. Dunno.
    • bookofjoe10 minutes ago
      >... I am probably just going to remove my email from my profile.

      Did this two weeks ago for this exact reason.

    • Imustaskforhelp18 minutes ago
      > It makes me a little sad. Engaging with the community was something I always liked about HN and now its gotten to a point where I am probably just going to remove my email from my profile.

      It makes me sad as well because as part of the younger generation who scrolls around on here, it feels as if AI is enshittifying the human aspects of what made internet good and I have no recourse of that because I was just born in this era.

      Truly sad as I do wonder if I missed some era or was just at the end of its gate closing and I am witnessing the door close because too many roaches are entering from the door.

      I just had an idea while writing this but I do wonder if something can be done: suppose that there could be a way of E-mail or some service where you enter your E-mail and it creates another E-mail which can act as an alias.

      now for anybody who sends the message to alias, if they want the message to be delivered, (they need some level of human trust that they are human) and they would need to log-in from their HN account and they would need a specific amount of karma that you can set.

      So example. you can decide that only people with 1000+ karma or 10k+ words on Hackernews can comment.

      (One of my projects actually works on detecting the number of words and you have written 6,56,876 words on Hackernews for reference, so my point is that the filter can be technically possible for both karma/words whichever might be harder to fake, hey plus points if we can see the total number of words and run it through some AI scanner to detect if its AI/human for even more detection though I am unsure its overkill)

      just thinking my thoughts out loud as I don't wish this community and its interactions to die, if not for myself then for the next generation just a few years down myself and I would prefer a world where if I invest a bit of time on HN then I can interact with you using E-mail without the problem of spam forcing you to remove your e-mail from the profile.

      What do you think of the idea of project that I have thought of: Is it worth pursuing/any feedback?

  • Agentlien3 minutes ago
    I am sad that this amazing technology is being used to turn so much stuff to shit. At least I am consoled by the fact that my level of activity on HN never generated any such e-mails to begin with, so there's nothing there to ruin for me personally.

    On Reddit I used to get PMs every now and then, but even years ago those were always either "please buy our product" or "please build my game for me".

  • gwbas1c7 minutes ago
    > I’ve started sending short emails back and only if I don’t get a pitch back do I actually engage but I dislike feeling distrustful, treating people as guilty until proven innocent.

    > but I can’t bring myself to take my email address down

    A couple of things:

    1: Use a different email address specifically for Hacker News. This is trivial if you own your own domain. (For example, I have a separate email address for my website.)

    2: Set up an autoresponder with a short message, something like:

    "I used to enjoy getting emails from the Hacker News community; I still do! But, due to the unreasonable number of product pitches, please:

    1: Confirm that you're a real person, and that you wrote the words you sent to me.

    2: Confirm that you're not trying to sell me something."

    Then only engage based on the response.

    > I know there is nothing HN can do about this, it’s not their fault

    In today's world, there's a few ways HN could mitigate this, if they chose to. The simplest is to put email addresses (or the profile page itself) behind AI / scraping detection. (And I admit it's frustrating to have to ask for this.) They could also only show emails to logged in users with some karma.

    The more complicated is for HN to proxy emails in a way similar to Craigslist. (And this would be going above and beyond the call of duty.) Users would need to be logged in, and have some karma, to send email; AND users who abuse it, (IE, send more than X cold emails over a period of Y hours) would be throttled.

  • UserMark27 minutes ago
    I've been getting these too. The first paragraph references something I actually wrote, so I read it thinking someone had a follow-up. Then I get to the pitch.

    I still like hearing from people who found me through HN. It just sucks that my first instinct now is to skim to the bottom and see what they're selling.

    • joshstrange7 minutes ago
      In the past when I got pitches (it did happen pre-LLMs, just far less) I was less annoyed because at least it seemed like a human had read enough of what I wrote but now I fear it's just

      > Scan HN for comments related to <my product>, write an email referencing their comment, and end with an open-ended question that will set us up to pitch our product when they reply.

      Even the cold emails I might be able to stomach but it not clear to me if any human ever read anything (my comment, my email replies, etc). Just depressing.

    • tombert25 minutes ago
      Your absolutely right, that is annoying — and that's a keen observation to have made.

      Many people don't enjoy getting unsolicited emails without substance. Being annoyed isn't a flaw, it's a strength.

      What about it annoys you the most? Is it because of the pitch? Or is it because of the lack of human connection. Let me know.

      (joking, hopefully obviously. I typed this with my fingers. It wasn't an AI that wrote it).

      • GavinMcG21 minutes ago
        Irony can be amusing here, but in this case—at least to me—it just accelerates the very mistrust we’re talking about.
        • tombert19 minutes ago
          Yeah. I'll add a disclaimer.
  • mamcx6 minutes ago
    Is also rampant in my case with jobs "offerings".

    Is very sad because one of the best opportunities I have was directly from HN and was because I some little comment!

    I'm looking for opportunities working on system-level stuff like RDBMS and before I know that being remote and from Colombia the chance was low but from HN and such was possible, now with all of this look like the chance is zero.

    At least, I have my own mini-ISV doing ERP-like apps, but for people entering this will become brutal.

    • joshstrange3 minutes ago
      Completely agree! I got my current job through HN (6+ years now) and I've hired people through HN (by finding their comments or them finding mine). I really hate that what was once such high signal is mostly noise.
  • rickcarlino29 minutes ago
    I had an “Office Hours” link on my blog to do Google Meets with HN users. It was fun to catch up with strangers.

    I had to take it down this month. We have entered a new era of social interaction on the internet.

    • binarymax26 minutes ago
      Were you getting product pitch bookings? Or was it something else?
      • rickcarlino22 minutes ago
        They were very rare, but it is happening more now. “I was amazed by $PROJECT_I_SCRAPED_FROM_GITHUB and would love to find ways we can collaborate”
  • necovek7 minutes ago
    From the chart, it looks like there is still a steady number of "regular emails", it's just that they get drowned by the noise (large increase in total incoming emails, percentage going down at similar rate points at stavle absolute number). Perhaps leverage the classifier you created to decide which to respond to?
  • bob10292 minutes ago
    I get about one of these a week.

    Most of the recent ones are just AI slop that go straight to the bin. Some are real. Sometimes we will actually schedule a meeting that never occurs.

    I suspect what happens in the latter case is someone finds a comment they super agree with but then has enough downtime to review everything I've posted over the last 9 years. Eventually, they run into something they don't like and turn into a ghost.

    The HN community is really fucking aggressive with their ideologies. The asymmetry is sad. I am willing to endure a lot of neckbeard shit about OSS and owning everything in the stack. The reciprocal does not exist at all. The moment I express even a mild preference for a "forbidden" idea like using Microsoft's technologies, straight to jail. I feel like I'd probably be more relaxed at a 4chan meetup than a HN meetup.

  • dsign11 minutes ago
    I wonder what comes after. I'm thankful of my work colleagues who are tech-literate, and that the LLMs don't usually play online video-games, though bots and insidious surveillance abound there. It feels like we need to transition to some sort of hybrid and web-of-trust human interaction for specialized topics.
  • figassis24 minutes ago
    One interesting change for me is I used to have zero time to write personal emails, but due to AI making me a lot more time efficient, I now can and do write personal emails for things I’m just generally interested in, allowing me to create relationships outside my immediate professional or social sphere.
  • Copenjin4 minutes ago
    Same thing for blog posts, yes, it've very sad.
  • coder54320 minutes ago
    I've also gotten a lot of similar spam emails from people scraping popular GitHub projects to find contributors' emails, then referencing such and such work that you did on XYZ project.

    Please stop. This is not an acceptable way to perform cold outreach.

  • 20k34 minutes ago
    Its incredibly depressing that LLMs have made so many facets of life strictly worse. Everything is absolutely inundated with slop

    I'm mildly hopeful that when text watermarking comes in, we'll be able to automatically filter out all the LLM crap that gets generated currently. It feels like we're in the very early days of email becoming a tool used for mass spam, while we figure out exactly how to deal with that

    • cphoover7 minutes ago
      watermarking will only work if it's embedded in the model (i.e. frontier/paid offerings). The rate at which open-source/open-weight models are advancing I think watermarks are probably only a temporary solution right? Fragmentation of the models available, or having more models that don't contain watermarks available will probably make this technique useless in the future I would think?
    • gedy29 minutes ago
      Relying on in person relationships and communication are vastly better if digital channels get saturated with noise.
      • cobertos19 minutes ago
        But cultivating those takes so much time and is geographically limited. The quality is also less, as the pool of people is so much smaller. But I admit, in-person is more rewarding (for me personally, in the longer term).

        I'm debating living in a van to have continued geographic flexibility in choosing social interactions of quality.

        But there has to be a better way, right?

        As for now, I cling dearly to the friends I have. But it's... worrying

  • ipdashc28 minutes ago
    > Hi Josh, saw your HN comment about [thing you said]. [Compliment.] I’m curious, [open-ended question]?

    Why does every sales email talk like this? It doesn't seem like LLM accent, or maybe it's just a different LLM accent from the "programmer" one. It's just funny how instantly recognizable this is as a fake-chummy sales email even despite the brackets.

    • TZubiri15 minutes ago
      LLMs seem to take whatever was trending at 2024 and make it a permanent style.
    • Agentlien8 minutes ago
      To me that sounds exactly like one of the free tier ChatGPT personalities I've encountered when asking random questions about non-work stuff. It's always a reference to something in my message, often calling it the most important part or something. Waxing poetic about how insightful it is. Then "I'm curious" or "The thing I want to know" followed by some random uninteresting follow-up question.
  • julianlam8 minutes ago
    Yes, I've definitely seen an uptick as well (as in, the baseline control reading was 0 emails per year.. I'm not very popular!)

    It's always something cherry-picked out of an LLM's research into so-and-so's HN/GitHub/etc.

    Most recently I got a cold email pitch referencing my "Who Wants To Be Hired" post from... 2024

  • chubot29 minutes ago
    I posted a job ad here over year ago, and I continue to get REALLY BAD automated spam applying for jobs.

    It's not even going as far as using an LLM. It's just a bad e-mail that is obviously sent en masse, where the sender obviously didn't read the job ad.

    As far as I can tell, the people are using their real name for this. And sending the same spam multiple times with "nags".

    I get that with any public-facing thing you will get a wide spectrum, and I'm picking on the people at the bottom of the spectrum ... but it still makes me a little sad. It would almost be more understandable if they used an LLM !! :-/ :-/

  • comrade123433 minutes ago
    Yeah, it's almost interesting the sophisticated targeted spam I get now, almost definitely automated with llms. Most of it gets my details right except for one that thinks I'm a dentist.

    On the other hand the amount of scans on my servers' ssh ports have dropped to about 1/4 since Ukraine started destroying Russian colos.

  • locallost3 minutes ago
    > I know there is nothing HN can do about this, it’s not their fault, I publicly post my email address on my profile, that’s on me. In the past it’s led to serendipity, now it more often leads to frustration.

    I guess you personally can do something about it, e.g. you can at least post the names of.yhe companies doing this. Also writing a blog post IMHO helps because you at least get your point across. It's better to speak out and not let this get normalized. If more people frown upon this, the rest will follow.

  • declan_roberts8 minutes ago
    Are real life networks going to become even more popular as we move bravely into AI enshittification of online spaces? I can't even say "call me" anymore because I'll probably get a Grok bot or some other bullshit.
  • psadri18 minutes ago
    Does the world already have too much software if people have to resort to these “channels”?
  • mhitza32 minutes ago
    I've got my own fair share of similar emails this year. I've replied to the only one that seemed human written (and of potential usefulness) to never hear back :D
  • CrzyLngPwd9 minutes ago
    For every 1 thing AI makes better, it ruins 100 things.
  • TZubiri16 minutes ago
    >"It’s like having an amplification attack pointed at you, someone sends 2-3 sentences (sometimes more)"

    One light in the crisis is that cybersecurity isn't just in higher demand, but it's starting to be in demand for areas that previously didn't need it. It's not just systems that are under attack, but people.

    Pivoting to security is a pretty safe option to not be out of a job these coming years

  • petesergeant27 minutes ago
    I'm hoping my current profile helps with this. Could go either way.
  • verdverm27 minutes ago
    Second this, also coming from GitHub too. The nature of the messages has definitely changed. You can find skills out there for abusing HN for marketing purposes. Have pondered making pull requests to add the Guidelines as a way to slip in "don't do this, it breaks the rules" without needing to ask for those words to be merged explicitly.

    I may remove my email and force them to go through my discord, but it sucks having to make outreach more difficult because tragedy of the commons.

  • Imustaskforhelp30 minutes ago
    Yea I have had the same thing and I immediately understood the issue.

    We definitely need some way to name and shame such companies.

    I had created a HN submission[0] when I had gotten one such message, it was around the rob pike situation (where he got E-mail from AI bots)

    I do sure hope that something can happen in terms of naming and shaming them. Also people who are sending these AI generated messages have to realize that they just end up generating a large amount of hate for whoever they are sending the message and it is much better if they wish, to send human generated messages and in a limited manner rather than being a spam machine if they wish to be in the business for a long time.

    [0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47590808

    • sowbug21 minutes ago
      I'd be surprised if shaming had any effect. People rarely think it's spam when they're the sender.
    • tombert27 minutes ago
      My only direct submission that has gotten any traction at all [1] has made my life a little annoying. I am now occasionally getting messages from people that want me to pay them money to promote my project.

      I don't respond back them to them, but I always want to respond with "dude this was something I vibe coded over the course of a week that almost by definition has no means of monetization", but of course it would be just arguing with a literal machine.

      [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49746401

      • Imustaskforhelp16 minutes ago
        > I don't respond back them to them, but I always want to respond with "dude this was something I vibe coded over the course of a week that almost by definition has no means of monetization", but of course it would be just arguing with a literal machine.

        There is such an level of assymetry where it takes us effort to suppose even write such a comment but then we know that its going to a machine so to no avail.

        And yet the spam messages still land in the mail so what happens is that we just end up being frustrated without any avail which is just annoying and rage-inducing.

  • smjy_studio27 minutes ago
    [flagged]
  • ReDress22 minutes ago
    [dead]