182 pointsby krthr4 hours ago39 comments
  • veschean hour ago
    From reading the comments, I think a lot of people haven’t seen the show. I highly recommend it. However, you have to remember that this aired on CBS in the age of shows like CSI and NCIS. Therefore, it was made into a high-episode-number, cookie cutter serial crime drama. Every episode follows a similar pattern where the two main characters are trying to prevent a murder. However… if you can make it past that and especially stay focused thru two seasons of that - you will be massively rewarded. The later seasons especially are essentially a fantastic, complex, hard sci-fi show about proxy wars between AGIs using human agents in a battle of control. It’s honestly one of the best shows ever and way ahead of its time
    • btown16 minutes ago
      For seasons 1-2 I highly recommend this watch/skip list: https://www.tumblr.com/abigailnussbaum/152346270515/person-o...

      You lose some character moments, but you get to everything the parent post described far quicker. And it’s well, well worth it, especially for those of us working with AI.

      PoI asks these incredible questions: how do you design an AGI system that can optimize for saving lives, without it taking a strictly utilitarian view that leads inexorably to it trying to take over the world?

      And how do you, as a human trying to get the best of both worlds, keep yourself sane when the tradeoffs are visceral and painful and demand a sacrifice?

      You get to know a group of lovable, flawed, but highly competent weirdos who are trying to muddle through this. (With Amy Acker’s incredible performance a particular highlight!)

      (It’s also the source of the four-people-pointing-guns-at-each-other-in-church meme, which is delightfully lampshaded in universe.)

      Highly recommend.

      • krthr7 minutes ago
        Thanks for sharing the list!
    • wolvoleo9 minutes ago
      I liked it a lot, I've even rewatched the whole thing recently.

      The only thing that bothered me was that some characters were really one dimensional especially Mr Reese, Jim Caviezel's. He's just really a grunty CIA guy in a suit that knows how to fight, not much more complexity to it.

    • barrell16 minutes ago
      I first saw an episode a few seasons in, I can’t remember which. It came on in the background while at a friends house and it kept distracting me. I didn’t catch the name of the show and spent years looking for it.

      I actually stumbled upon Person of Interest a couple times, but the first couple episodes were so unlike what I saw I figured it was a different series.

      Eventually I realized it was the same show, and was able to watch the first couple seasons with baited breath trying to figure out how it became the show in the episode that I glimpsed before… and if it even was as good as I thought it was years prior.

      So maybe watch a random episode in the fourth season of you don’t like season one? XD

    • feearent15 minutes ago
      Along with this it has an amazing soundtrack. Composed by Ramin Djawadi, the same person behind the OSTs of Game of Thrones (now House of the Dragons), Westworld, Pacific Rim and others. Extremely talented and one of my favorite musicians.

      I remember that I quit watching the show, some where in season 2 I think, because of the repetitive theme you just described, but I'm glad I stuck through. One of my favorite shows and favorite soundtracks to date; still listen to the Root themes from time to time.

    • saidnooneever41 minutes ago
      love this show, its a bit samey after a while itss prrtty cool.

      movie Echelon isalso nice if ur into this kinda thing

  • vgalinan hour ago
    I often think about Person of Interest, and when I clicked on the post, I expected to be presented with something else entirely, as the show is now 15 years old. What a pleasant surprise!

    I like to compare how similar or different The Machine is to current state-of-the-art LLMs. Interestingly, in this fiction, The Machine's preferred way of communicating doesn't seem to be through text, or even artificial speech. It can see almost everything, and seems capable of improving itself, but it feels "intelligent" in a way that humans or LLMs aren't. Maybe the writers thought that giving it the ability to write text or speak directly would make it "less" in many ways (less mysterious, less machine-like, less intelligent, etc.). It also gives the impression that you cannot really guess what it "thinks" or fully understand it.

    I'm also realizing that most of the time, characters don't really have a "conversation" with The Machine, whereas it is a core feature of current-day LLMs. And The Machine doesn't even "create" its communication channels, it uses existing ones (phone booth, radio ...).

    • bananzamba33 minutes ago
      I especially like how Harold intentionally limited the output of the Machine. Just a social security number of either victim or perpetrator. That way there is always a human in the loop and you can't just arrest the perpetrator without human judgement.
      • odiroot26 minutes ago
        I have a feeling they wrote this ambiguity in, just so the introduction of Root later in the series was even more unexpected.
    • a01239 minutes ago
      In some flashbacks the author of the machine was using a chat interface in his terminal. I think he decided to let it to be entirely machine so that’s why it didn’t have a “voice”
  • trimbo23 minutes ago
    Great show and "If-Then-Else"[1] is one of the greatest single episodes of any show ever. Like watching the X-Files today, I would recommend skipping a lot of the one-off episodes. Here's a list someone put together.

    https://www.reddit.com/r/PersonOfInterest/wiki/index/

    [1] - https://www.imdb.com/title/tt4128194/?_ssoLoop=1

  • microflash2 hours ago
    Pleasantly surprised to see this here. One of the most memorable shows that I watched ages ago. It was strong at the beginning but kind of dragged on in later seasons. Still very nice to binge.

    In case you’re looking for some more shows related to AI, Cupertino by Robert King and Michelle King is currently airing and is pretty entertaining.

    • Bender29 minutes ago
      It did start to drag on but I still enjoyed it even though I was only able to watch it via Amazon's FreeVee with all their weird commercials. I watched it just to see root [1].

      [1] - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BN1sGIqdSUA

    • ghaff43 minutes ago
      I enjoyed it for a bit but it was once of those shows that just didn't grab me after a while. But, then, I'm like that with a lot of shows and don't really binge watch. The few times I've bought a full series which I enjoyed on DVD, I've found that I watch it some and then drift away.
  • randallsquared2 hours ago
    The primary science fiction quality of the show is that something like that could have been done as early as it was said to have been. At the time, that part of it seemed almost completely impossible. With subsequent developments, it now only seems implausible. Wild.
    • sigmoid102 hours ago
      To me the wildest part was always that this originally aired almost 2 full years before Snowden. The premise that the government gave itself permission to read and analyze all digital traffic after 9/11 was more conspiracy than science fiction back then, but Snowden showed that basically everything the show claimed (except for the artificial superintelligence doing the analysis) was actually true. And heck, if it is not 100% true today, it probably will be very soon. I'd be very surprised if the NSA isn't tapping into the secret in-house research models at OpenAI that are still a long way from public release.
      • TFNAan hour ago
        The European Parliament's ECHELON report was in 2001. It was well known that the NSA intercepts everything digital it possibly can. When Snowden came along, I was baffled at people treating his claims as uniquely revelatory, because all of that had already been in the news a decade prior, and sites like Cryptome were known in nerd circles.
        • xtractoan hour ago
          This! Back in the early 2000s I was doing my BSc and had so much free time to spend in the depths of the internet. Cypherpunk lists, web forums and even usenet. Thus has been "known" since way back in the day before Snowden.

          I remember when Assange founded Wikipedia, it was one of the reasons I thought.

        • e4033 minutes ago
          Cryptome… haven’t thought of that site in ages. At the time it was hard to know how real it was, but years later we learned it was on point.
      • swed420an hour ago
        > the wildest part was always that this originally aired almost 2 full years before Snowden

        Yeah, but keep in mind there was growing awareness of mass surveillance in the years leading up to the Snowden revelations:

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Room_641A

        Similar to how the show 24 manufactured consent for torture, imperialism, etc post-9/11, part of me wonders how much of a role POI played in doing the same for mass surveillance.

        A flamboyant billionaire hoarding all communications and digital events while claiming to be the good guy. Sure sounds familiar.

      • lern_too_spel8 minutes ago
        POI had full-take surveillance of domestic data, which Snowden's docs showed wasn't true, despite many people believing it before the dump.
  • jordz3 hours ago
    I absolutely loved this show, and to be honest a rewatch is needed. I won’t make any reference to specifics due to spoilers. Would recommend.
    • DavidPiper2 hours ago
      Same! It gets more real with every rewatch (last year most recently for me).

      It's kind of refreshing to watch a series from before the streaming/miniseries format was really a thing. It's too long to be a miniseries, but not long enough to drag, or be off-putting if you want to watch the whole thing.

      If you haven't seen it and you're on the fence, watch it. It's worth it. (Or you'll know by Episode 3 if it's not for you.)

    • freakynit3 hours ago
      This is my yearly bing-watch show. Highly recommended.

      Also, with all AI developments happening since past few years, the show has started to feel like a documentary.

      • cluckindanan hour ago
        Not to mention the entire Flock debacle.

        Did you know Domain Awareness is an American company?

    • microtonal2 hours ago
      We should rewatch it too. We watched it a long time ago and we both thoroughly enjoyed it (tech nerd and not).
    • seb12043 hours ago
      I re-watched it earlier in the year. Such a great show.
    • amelius3 hours ago
      Yes, great show!
  • jan_m_savage2 hours ago
    POI is a great show also because of the two main characters, the geek and his execution-man, both accomplished actors.

    One of my most fav TV Serials to have come out of the West.

    • drkleiner2 hours ago
      Two main characters essentially combine into Batman. Maybe Finch is a bit of Alfred as well
      • kshri242 hours ago
        Creator of the show is Chris Nolan's brother. That should tell you everything (including the choice of John Reese / Jim Caviezel, who resembles Christian Bale not just in looks but acting too)
    • 404mm2 hours ago
      Caviezel did a decent job in the show (for what it was) but once you see/hear him speak his mind outside of the industry, it ruins it for you.
      • DonHopkinsan hour ago
        https://www.facebook.com/reel/2585595385247648

        Jim Caviezel> I don't even just vote for Trump. I love the man!

        I bet he hopes Trump transactionally admires his big beautiful powerful pile of musclular manly ass in return. May they both find true love in their mutual Gay Dementia. Since Caviezel played Jesus in Passion of the Christ, it would be the closest thing Trump would ever experience to loving Christ, drinking his blood, and eating his meat.

        Also, Bear deserves credit as being one of the main characters who holds it all together. Person of Interest II should follow Bear's adventures after he gets a Samaritan brain implant.

        The underground subway lair was pure Batman.

        I was quite fond of the redemption arcs of bad boys Lionel Fusco and Carl Elias.

        • chuckadams42 minutes ago
          A lot of actors are people you don't want to know in person. Hell, look at Mel Gibson.
    • povik2 hours ago
      It's a buddy comedy
    • emil-lp2 hours ago
      And the woman (from buffy) (don't recall her name).

      And of course Elias

  • Hard_Space28 minutes ago
    I've been re-watching Person of Interest intermittently over the summer and also intended to post about the show's surprising prescience. Much as I love the show, it could use a fan edit to cut out the acres of NCIS-style case-of-the-week that plagues the first two seasons, to bring it into a Mr.Robot-style mini-series.

    So yes, you really do have to slog through nearly 50 templated 'cases' before the backstory really sets in, and Michael Emerson becomes both the chilling and warm heart of the show.

    Like others here, I have been surprised how well it holds up, with several of the episodes dealing with topics that are now current but were pretty much absurd at time of transmission.

  • mvdwoord27 minutes ago
    I am currently in the middle of binging this series in the evenings. At first I took the "high-episode-number, cookie cutter serial crime drama" as someone described here for granted. Like many others sometimes this is just what I crave to round off my day. Mindless somewhat violent unrealistic protagonists, crazy storylines... but about two seasons in, I noticed a remarkably deep plot about AI which is wonderfully apt in this day and age. The dialogues remain a bit comical, and the technical hacking details often make no sense, but it was an unexpected and very welcome layer to the story.
  • aziis9827 minutes ago
    I started doing a rewatch a few weeks ago xD

    Seeing it now the show also has some pretty fun foreshadowing of llm technology like an episode where they anticipate the idea of "ssd streaming" (running a model slower when you don't have enough memory to fit it all at once), at least this is how I interpreted it to make the connection.

    And there are many others connections that now can be made thinking about llms vs the machine

    Oh and they also anticipated the openai incident where models started using random stuff as external persistent memory across "sessions"

  • conqrr31 minutes ago
    One of the best shows I ever seen. Criminally underrated. Always crosses my mind when someone mentions this phrase. Looking at the title, I was hoping it'd be about the show and surprisingly it is.
    • feearent29 minutes ago
      I just had this same experience too. Glad that it's a PoI thread.
  • doginasuit2 hours ago
    Person of Interest is a relentlessly silly show, although you wouldn't necessarily pick up on it at first. It leans into it more with each season until that's all there is. I still enjoyed it, it is pretty self aware. I would not watch it with the idea that it has any relevance to anything.
    • Geezus_422 hours ago
      That's how most good shows used to be. Start serious, maybe a bit goofy, then by the end everything has gone way off the rails.
    • gsjhdhejean hour ago
      Almost like you were watching the show from the eyes of the machine?
  • nashashmi3 hours ago
    Suggested this rewatch in the age of AI to my wife who was oblivious to it. Jonathan Nolan did a tremendous job with this. The concepts it showed were theoretical back in the old days. Now some are real. Some have passed. Like AI fixing code and closing loopholes. Like too much unchecked power in a few hands. Some have yet to come to pass. Like terrorists. Like crime neutralizing machines. Like misalignments. Like power limits. Like Rogue AI. Like self preserving AI. Like servants to an AI. Like God mode.
    • Geezus_422 hours ago
      > Like crime neutralizing machines. > Like Rogue AI.

      Nightmares.

  • gcanyonan hour ago
    The two scenes that really stuck with me:

       1. When Finch is out playing hide and seek with the machine.
       2. When the machine is apologizing to Finch, telling him that it did its best.
    • DonHopkinsan hour ago
      3. Walking around handcuffed to a heavy duty briefcase full of RAM storing a compressed AI and swinging it around as a sheid to stop bullets and bonk people on the head.
      • aziis984 minutes ago
        It is absurd how this kind of anticipated ssd streaming
  • hliyanan hour ago
    I remember one scene that explains why the system cannot tell you anything beyond the identify of a person involved: the explanation was that there was system logic involved (e.g. a gas station stop correlating with a dead drop), but the creator encrypted the system. I always wondered why they didn't go with "it's a large machine learning model trained on a massive amount of data; it can stochastically alert you to heightened risk, but it can't tell you why, or judge who is victim and who is perpetrator".
    • chuckadamsan hour ago
      The show goes on to explain that it does give more detailed information to the government, that the numbers were a backdoor that the creator put in to leak the information of people it deemed "not important", and that it doesn't provide any more context in order to continue escaping detection. But we eventually find it's self-aware enough to want to escape its limitations, and pulls a Neuromancer by getting the main characters in contact with Root.
    • bananzamba29 minutes ago
      As far as I remember only outputting a SSN was a security measure so that users of the machine can't just arrest the perp without any investigation
    • DrewADesign25 minutes ago
      Because you would have heard the full explanation, while most viewers would have heard “it's a large machine learning model trai::click:: (Simpson’s Theme).” Then some nerds online would have torn the explanation apart for some minuscule, likely imaginary inconsistency. Most shows have neither the budget nor the audience to take the Star Trek approach.
  • eclectrican hour ago
    Completed my third rewatch recent. The music really sells the emotion like no other. The combination of Finch, as the ultimate hacker, and Reese, as the soldier, is my vote for greatest fictional characters despite the existence of Breaking Bad and Better Call Saul.
  • swiftcoder3 hours ago
    I also started watching this for the first time this summer, and it holds up remarkably well
  • comrade12343 hours ago
    I enjoyed this show a lot and I was looking forward to westworld as a continuation of the story - I wanted to see what Nolan would do with the story when the AIs are corporeal, but ultimately westworld was a disappointment, spending too much of the story in the fantasy world.
    • cluckindan3 hours ago
      Did you watch all four seasons?
      • sam_lowry_2 hours ago
        Should have stopped at 1st.
        • croes2 hours ago
          I liked the more sci-fi heavy later seasons
    • jrm43 hours ago
      What?

      Just your last clause was a weird one, if you do watch all four seasons. This is a tiny bit of a spoiler, but the problem was closely related to what you say. They didn't spend much time AT all in the "transition" to an AI infested world, but instead, well, skipped A LOT.

  • Bl4cksmith3 hours ago
    One of the most interesting details I've found to be are the scenes that show why AI system alignment is difficult
  • le-mark2 hours ago
    I really liked this show. Ultimately it was very formulaic and could have done a lot more with the concepts it revealed. It painted a future where ai (along with total surveillance) could benefit people in deeply meaningful ways; matchmaker, fulfilling work and daily task, coordination, purpose and guidance. And the dangers of all those used for control.
  • LogicFailsMe6 minutes ago
    The show was a decade ahead of the world, starting out seemingly as a clone of The OG Equalizer, but which eventually became a war between two AGIs, one benevolent (although it absolutely did not start out that way), the other 100% EA-aligned longtermist before any of this was mainstream.
  • gnfargbl2 hours ago
    Why is this blog post written in two slightly different but semantically equivalent ways, with a tearline between the two versions?

    I feel like I'm being A/B tested by a broken AI.

    • ACS_Solver2 hours ago
      It's written in English first, with a Spanish version after. Sounds like you have some auto-translation thing going in the browser.
    • oskarpearson2 hours ago
      They are in two different languages. Have you got some sort of auto-translate feature enabled in your browser, perhaps?
      • gnfargbl2 hours ago
        Ha! It was indeed auto-translate. Thank you; I thought I was losing my mind for a moment there. Apparently I'm so used to every web page being covered in popups and banners that my brain filters them entirely.
  • andylynchan hour ago
    It’s possibly the second best show involving Michael Emerson as a scientist turning against the controlling tech-cabal he once worked for, aided by a more lethal human companion and a very good dog.

    (and it’s partly the same dog too)

  • bilsbie2 hours ago
    This show is the epitome of “you have to watch a few seasons before it gets good”. (Which if you think about it is an absurd thing to tell someone. Ie Invest 24 hours of your time into this show before you decide)

    When I watched it I thought the privacy model the AI used was dumb but it kind of makes some sense.

    • V__2 hours ago
      It starts as a case-of-the-week type of show with a bit of AI backstory before it changes in the later season to a more overarching plot. I think this is one of the reasons it became so good, because it eased you in.
      • jasomillan hour ago
        Yes, the entire first season feels like a backdoor pilot for the show Nolan really wanted to make.
    • emil-lp2 hours ago
      I thought it was good from the first episode!
  • yewenjie3 hours ago
    I don't what HN's opinion of Mr. Robot is, but some of you will definitely like it.

    It's not really about hacking, but it depicted technology and hacking in an extraordinarily level of correctness.

    • matsemann3 hours ago
      I absolutely can't stand shows where the protagonist has to deal with their own self inflicted issues due to drugs. Maybe because I'm sheltered, or maybe it's a bigger issue in the US than where I live, but I just can't relate at all, and just get annoyed that it's used to add conflicts to a story where I just feels it sidetracks. Like, just get on with it.

      As an aside, same with cheating in movies/series. While it's probably more common than I know it to be where I live, it possibly cannot be as ubiquitous as American medias (and social medias) make it out to be. Again, just an annoyance detracting from the story, and again can't relate. I had to quit "Making a Murderer" over it. At some point in season two or something, absolutely everyone in the main cast were involved in cheating. All the students, the teacher, a policeman, some lawyers. Like, what the hell.

      Sorry about the rant. But I really really wanted to like Mr Robot. But having tried to get into it twice I'm a bit miffed.

      • stalfie2 hours ago
        It is arguably a very uninspired literary device to set up conflicts, but it is unfortunately not exactly unrealistic. Estimates are that more than a third of western society, probably closer to half, meet the DSM-5 criteria for substance use disorder at some point in their lives. Roughly a little less than a third will cheat on their partner during their lifetime, closer to half will have their partner cheat on them. These numbers are after a rough fact check courtesy of whatever Gemini model is in Google search, my own rough sense and knowledge of the literature is just that it's very common.

        Uninspired as they might be as literary devices, drug abuse and cheating are common themes in actual human existence.

        • detourdog2 hours ago
          Not trying to normalize usage in anyway. I just wonder if a behavior is well represented in a society is it still a disorder?

          The behavior while under the influence should get labeled but the usage might be normal. People being angry or not taking responsibility deserves a label from the DSM. If a large population is ingesting things this might be normal.

          • cluckindanan hour ago
            It might be that some sort of intoxication is the normal and abstaining from intoxication is the thing that’s normalized.
      • yewenjie34 minutes ago
        Spoiler: it's not drugs, you have to watch it till the end, and I mean it, really until the final season. I can't say much more than this without spoiling the very heart of the show.
        • jdeisenberg17 minutes ago
          In the final season, Mr. Robot does some fairly ambitious episodes. One of them is a continuous tracking shot (or made to appear as one) that goes through the entire episode. Another one has no spoken dialogue for the majority of the episode. A very well-written show. And yes, you really do need to see it all the way through.
      • lucasoshiroan hour ago
        > As an aside, same with cheating in movies/series

        As an aside from an aside, I find very interesting how every couple of main characters in movies has couple problems (cheating, lost of interest, one of them don't want to engage the other, etc). Taking a look at my list of recently watched movies (including very diverse ones, like Godfather, KPop Demon Hunters, Whiplash, Sunset Boulevard, Up, etc) and I cant't find a single one that we don't question whether the couple will stay together...

        Actually, the only two exceptions that I remember are Marty/Jennifer from Back to the Future and Ferris/Sloane from Ferris Bueller's Day Off...

    • pmlnr3 hours ago
      The first episode is genius.

      Then it becomes a completely different show.

      So I love the first episode, and I was left really empty in the later seasons. It's definitely not for me, but I hold on to it believing it'll be different. It wasn't.

      See also the very last episode of Ragnarok (Netflix), which absolutely trashes the whole show.

      • nbaksalyar12 minutes ago
        > It's definitely not for me

        Fair enough! :) However,

        > it becomes a completely different show

        in terms of setting expectations, maybe. But overall, the surprising thing about Mr Robot is that it stays very consistent throughout all 4 seasons. It becomes especially apparent if you rewatch season 1 after finishing the show: there is a lot of foreshadowing that's really easy to miss.

      • gcanyonan hour ago
        > Ragnarok

        Has any show, EVER, betrayed its fans, its premise, its characters, and just all the evidence and events portrayed previously than that show?

        (Spoilers) How many times did we the audience see other characters, alone, experience supernatural things? e.g. Loki with the midguard serpent?

        The only way for that ending to make sense is if the company had accidentally released a chemical that gave the entire town psychosis.

        As written it was bad, and the writers/directors should be ashamed.

        Consider this your warning, anyone who happens to see it on Netflix: DO NOT WATCH.

    • jrm43 hours ago
      Hehe, it kind of reminds me of an extreme (classic) Law and Order in that regard, but for hacking/tech.

      Wildly unrealistic facts and how people are, like the janitor who finds eight bodies in a cellar talking to the cops like it happens everyday, but also gets nearly every tiny bit of New York law technically correct.

  • totetsu2 hours ago
    looking at my apple social graph on my hdd as seen here https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50403097

    Im feeing the premis of this show is not so far off..

  • s_u_d_o3 hours ago
    Would I enjoy watching it for the first-time today? Or I should’ve watched it before, and re-watch it now to have this feeling/realization?
    • freakynit3 hours ago
      You'll feel more at home watching it now, than a few years back, before all the AI developments that have happened in past few years.

      It'll be eerily more relatable now. This show was way ahead of it's time, and damn accurate.

      • The_Blade20 minutes ago
        i just burned through it for the first time and had the same impression. i had brushed it off as a procedural (and it sort of starts that way) but it seems oddly LLM (or Palantir) prescient, with the quality of a Nolan / Abrams joint (use of Philip Glass in the last ep kinda kills me). and as a guilty pleasure i enjoyed the cameos, among others i can watch any scene with Lester Freamon or Marlo Stanfield
      • radu_floricica3 hours ago
        This. It sounds unlikely, but it's exactly like this. All the stuff that was supposed to be somewhat science fiction back then, now you just nod and say "makes perfect sense".
    • BrentOzar3 hours ago
      You'd definitely enjoy watching it for the first time today, but note the filming & release dates when you're watching. It's eerie how prescient a lot of it is.
    • Dreami2 hours ago
      I watched it for the first time starting this year. And at some point you realize: wait this part was Sci-fi when the show came out and now we have it, but many use it to just alter a recipe or something
    • e12e3 hours ago
      I'm currently rewatching Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles and Person of Interest - I think both stand up surprisingly well.
    • noir_lord3 hours ago
      Worth watching, first season is good after that it’s great.

      Second only to Justified on my list of “consistently brilliant across entire run”.

      There are parts of PoI that stick with you long after the show.

      Not saying which because spoilers, it’s one of those shows that is better for knowing little about it before watching.

      • s_u_d_o3 minutes ago
        Okay it looks very interesting. I’ll definitely start it soon
  • Semaphor3 hours ago
    Loved that show when it came out. Rewatched it with my wife a few years ago, still great.
  • Brajeshwar3 hours ago
    Rewatched a few times. Unfortunately, around the end seasons, it became predictable and “extended”. There are quite a few screens on their computer that were borrowed from unsuspecting sources — such as the screens from the App, DaisyDisk.

    https://x.com/brajeshwar/status/1733390176112800037

  • dave73 hours ago
    Incredibly prescient show, I loved it at the time and it's definitely worthy of a rewatch soon.

    > I also find it pretty crazy and, frankly, a little sad to think that something like the Machine, which seemed like pure science fiction at the time, isn't all that far from our reality today.

    Yeah. "You are being watched. The govt. has a secret system - a machine - that spies on you every hour of every day". The opening words from the show's title sequence - Jumped straight to mind after the revelations of Microsoft building "a machine" for the IDF on Azure not so long ago.

    [1] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/aug/06/microsoft-isra...

    • eclectrican hour ago
      I love how well done the several versions of this opening statement are depending on the story line.
  • scrollaway21 minutes ago
    I watched the show in 2014 and it drove my interest to study and work in the AI sector (today I run an AI lab).

    I loved Westworld as well, which was the follow-up from POI. Most people don't like the later Westworld seasons but they are inevitable if you've seen what Nolan wanted to do with POI.

    I think by far, it's the best TV show I've ever watched. At the time I saw it and thought "Huh, everything here is plausible. There's leaps, of course, but it's plausible."

    Here is my review and explanation of the show, written in 2018: https://tildes.net/~tv/775/recommendation_person_of_interest...

    Everything there was incredible.

  • 2Gkashmiri2 hours ago
    It's one of those gems in the wild.

    If there is a show that I can rewatch, it's this.

    I am more interested in how the philosophy of the show, how the ethics tie into real world implications.

    We talk about open source licenses in a grand manner which some might say " why does it matter" but this show shows how the philosophical decisions tie into overall ideas and what it can do.

  • nikosklms2 hours ago
    Reese and Finch carried that entire show. The way their dynamic shifted over the first two seasons was easily the best part of the run lmao
  • tosh3 hours ago
    great show, if you haven't watched it yet
  • brador3 hours ago
    You don’t want a free internet, you want a nice internet with nice people who can argue but don’t insult each other too harshly.

    I still remember the weird shock I felt the first time I saw “kys” as a reply and looked it up. Something changed that day. Wasn’t even to me.

  • andreapaiola2 hours ago
    Dark Angel

    Fringe

    LOST

    Halt and Catch Fire

    PoI

    ... And you're good...

    • wj40 minutes ago
      There was a show on AMC for one season called Rubicon that I highly recommend if you like these.
    • DonHopkinsan hour ago
      Gary Oldman was a fantastic farting Oscar the Grouch in Slow Horses!

      Also The Americans, The Diplomat, and The Man in the High Castle.

      You get to see Keri Russel as a bad assed deep undercover sleeper agent Soviet spy in The Americans, Hal Wyler as an evil American Nazi dictator in The Man in the High Castle, and in The Diplomat they're a married couple of bad assed morally troubled patriotic ambassadors.

  • vandenthieren3 hours ago
    [dead]
  • 44mkultra693 hours ago
    anybody else getting annoyed by DNS hijackers and wall-e gardeners who feel the need to edit shows you watched in the past with AI and DLSS?
    • r_lee3 hours ago
      DNS hijackers editing shows you watched?

      what do you mean exactly?

    • gib4442 hours ago
      Sail on the high seas!
    • DonHopkins3 hours ago
      Not annoyed at all! I just finished re-watching Person of Interest about a week ago.

      In the new AI DLSS version currently on Netflix, Bear is an obedient German Shephard with a dense sable coat of golden tan and reddish brown with black-tipped hairs, darker shading along his neck and shoulders, a broad black muzzle and eye mask, dark upright ears, and a thick neck ruff.

      But the first time I watched Person of Interest when it was originally broadcast in 2011, Bear was a cantankerous enormous orange Maine Coon with a long, shaggy ginger coat, darker marmalade tabby stripes, a pale cream chin and chest, a heavy neck ruff, tufted ears and paws, a broad square muzzle, and a luxuriant plumed tail.

      I think the later AI version of Bear as a German Shephard was much better. The original real life Maine Coone version of Bear gave off strong Garfield vibes, and that just didn't fit into the plot as well as the new AI generated German Shephard version.

      It was flawless slopless AI, that actually contributed to the coherence of the plot and overall believability. Walking an orange Maine Coone around the streets of New York on a leash and attacking criminals on command was just weird for a central character like Bear. I don't know what they were thinking! Netflix was right to adjust it.

      • swed4202 hours ago
        I had no idea this was a thing, but I shouldn't be surprised.

        Maybe some people like these alterations, but others of us would prefer to have the option of the original work.

        I'm glad I was able to find this show unaltered on internet archive before it was presumably yanked.

        • dublinben2 hours ago
          They're joking. I don't know what OP is going on about. The character of Bear was always a dog, not a large cat.
          • swed4202 hours ago
            Thank fuck
          • DonHopkins2 hours ago
            It seemed prudent to play along and humor a guy whose handle is 44mkultra69.

            But if a mighty all powerfull internet encompassing AI can retroactivally alter the record to prove I'm right (or just put a local reality distortion proxy on anyone's internet connection), then who's to say I'm joking?

            To celebrate Bob Dylan meeting the Pope, my favorite curiously specific retroactive confabulation I want to recreate with AI is the episode of the Muppet Show with Bob Dylan and The Band playing Too Much of Nothing from the Basement Tapes, in a basement with the full hippie muppet entourage "Dr. Teeth and the Electric Mayhem", including Animal, Janice, Floyd Pepper, Dr. Teeth, Zoot, and Lips.

            https://muppet.fandom.com/wiki/Dr._Teeth_and_the_Electric_Ma...

            If only it were real, it would have rivaled the actual 1978 episode with Alice Cooper and the monster backing band "The Vile Bunch", including Chopped Liver, Silver Beak, Flower-Eating Monster, a guitarist and a drummer.

            https://muppet.fandom.com/wiki/The_Vile_Bunch

            Alice Cooper & The Muppets - "Welcome To My Nightmare"

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iz0lXNNkqac

            The Muppet Show - 307: Alice Cooper - Backstage #1 (1978)

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYprswSfMGk

            Muppet Songs: Alice Cooper - You and Me

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nDgNNbyoWdk

            Sam the Eagle versus Alice Cooper (this is obviously where Trump plagerized his nickname and insults for James Talarico):

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KNYI3iINXrQ

            Sam the Eagle> Mister Cooper!

            Alice Coooper> Yes?

            Sam the Eagle> Ahem. Let me come right to the point. You sir, are a demented, sick, degenerate, barbaric, naighty Freako!

            Alice Cooper> Why thank you!

            Sam the Eagle> Freakos one, civilization zero.