72 pointsby Ariarule3 hours ago9 comments
  • einrealist2 hours ago
    For you, life cannot wait. Please go out and make contacts. Be welcoming to people. Fall in love.

    I wonder how my life would have turned out differently. I am a nerd. I am an introvert. I am single. Mostly, I am enjoying it. Sometimes - and increasingly more often - I am questioning it. I have baggage. Was visiting my (younger) sister's grave today. She had baggage with a sad outcome. I am thinking more about my existence.

    I wish this world would be a more kind place. And I am praising anyone who is contributing to that. Try to be a contributor.

    • sapphire4an hour ago
      I wish there were a handbook for single introverts in their 30s who feel like that ship sailed a long time ago.
      • lukan5 minutes ago
        I believe there are millions of them?

        But not sure how helpful they are.

        My advice is, go dancing. Learn to enjoy your body and how to move it freely for fun, then you will find a likeminded body to enjoy together. But depending where you life, finding a good place to dance with nice people and not just drunk idiots can be a bit harder unfortunately.

      • b1122 minutes ago
        Here's a handbook excerpt...

        Time seems to go faster, the older you are. When 5, a day lasts enormously, a month forever away.

        When 30, a day is still noticeable. When 50, a day flies past. When 70? A week vanishes so very quickly.

        A bitter truth of age, is the older you get, the less time you have left? Well, the faster that time seems to move to you. It's as if the more you try to hold on, the faster it goes away.

        There are ways to improve this. New experience is one. Doing the same thing every day, with no challenge or change, just makes life fly by.

        You can be an introvert and still experience loads of new and change. Trust me on this. And as a geeky introvert, you have a mind to learn daily, and more importantly, learn different things, not just tech.

        But I guess what I'm saying is, do indeed "live more", but do it as you. Don't let these weirdo extroverts make you dance to their tune.

    • litmus-pit-gitan hour ago
      There's a point when it feels it's over, there's no point. Some people think more about the end rather than the existence and realise there's no point – as in, there's really no point to any of this. This feeling doesn't necessarily mean the person is heading to the sad outcome. I mean that could have been a relief, at least to the person. But the saddest outcome is that there's really no recovery for some people and evolution keeps them going.
    • an hour ago
      undefined
    • drivebyhootingan hour ago
      Did we read the same article? This was about microbes and space exploration.
      • jader2017 minutes ago
        Maybe OP didn’t read the article, but often the title of the article is more interesting to HN than the article itself, which may be the case in this instance given it’s (currently) the top-voted comment.

        (As a side note, I wish titles were more fitting to the article, vs. trying to bait clicks with catchy titles that often suggest a different topic.)

      • 32 minutes ago
        undefined
    • beebmaman hour ago
      Did you read the article?
      • einrealist34 minutes ago
        Yes, but I took advantage of the article. My sister would have been a year older today.
      • AnimalMuppet38 minutes ago
        You have a point, that the comment isn't actually about the article. And yet, einrealist also has a point that is worth hearing. It's OT, but it's worth hearing.
  • gb2d_hn2 hours ago
    I thought this was going to be about my poor work-life balance from the title!?
    • e1g2 hours ago
      Me too, and my heart sank. I guess I don’t need an article to know what to do.
    • Varelion2 hours ago
      Same
    • pfdietzan hour ago
      Maybe you can be salty and bitter, as if you too were trapped in potassium chloride for millions of years...
  • themanmaran2 hours ago
    > But if 2-9-3 really had been isolated from its relative for a quarter billion years, enough random mutations in the rDNA should have accumulated for there to be a difference of at least 50 base pairs

    Occams razor definitely points to this just being a sterilization problem. But it would be funny if the bacteria was just way more stable than people expect.

  • schiffern2 hours ago
    One thing about panspermia math: why assume current travel conditions between the stars?

    Today the Sun is very far from other stars, but early in star formation (within nebula) the stars are

    1. much closer together

    2. have a higher rate of material ejection (mass exchange)

    3. likely have more benign radiation environments unless near a star, due to GCR shielding by nebula gas

    4. likely have higher equilibrium temperature in interstellar/interplanetary space

    Combined, these factors yield orders of magnitude improvement in panspermia efficiency vs the Sun.

    • idlewords34 minutes ago
      This has occurred to people! But if you run the numbers, they are still not good enough in that early (~100 My) window when stars in the parent nebula are close together, you get something like 1 chance in 1000 of possible panspermia events (based on modeling lumps of rock flying back and forth). Not terrible odds, but nothing like the Mars -> Earth odds.
    • pfdietzan hour ago
      Yes indeed, I've thought panspermia in the Sun's natal cluster is an interesting idea. What could make it even more interesting is that small bodies in our Solar System (and likely its sister systems) were warm enough for liquid water to exist for some millions of years then, so there would be an enormous volume of material in which Origin of Life might have occurred (and, if it did, to then spread after the parent body froze and then fragmented.)

      It would make a fine science fictional scenario that could get around the Fermi problem: those 10,000 or so systems could have life, but the rest of the universe not have life.

      • schiffern37 minutes ago

          >those 10,000 or so systems could have life, but the rest of the universe not have life.
        
        That's also neat to contemplate, thanks.

        I was thinking bigger: if panspermia gets dramatically more viable, then nebula could switch over in their probability distribution from "default sterile" to default teeming.

        In this scenario, we could find (related!) life essentially everywhere, and caused by panspermia no less, despite numbers still saying panspermia is wildly improbable for mature stars.

        • pfdietz6 minutes ago
          "Default teaming" really isn't viable due to the Fermi problem.

          But if OoL is extremely unlikely, the cluster panspermia idea still allows extraterrestrial life to reasonably exist and be reachable, because that life didn't require a separate highly unlikely OoL event.

          I think SETI should focus on stars that look like the Sun's siblings.

  • karbak3 hours ago
    For a brief moment there, seeing just the headline, I thought this was going to be about Pinboard.
  • jpablo2 hours ago
    I would have liked to find life in mars/the moon. At this point I think we should be tying to spread life everywhere.
  • thisisauserid3 hours ago
    Based on the article, there is solid proof that microbes can remain viable for up to 100,000 years.
  • almost_usualan hour ago
    Life doesn’t wait.
  • shevy-java2 hours ago
    I hate the website. Why? Because when I scroll down, I get blocked, that is, I can not easily copy/paste via a selection anymore; the selection simply does not work, and is connected to the slow-fade out and pop-in of an irrelevant widget I can not want to be bothered to even look at.

    Any author who uses such a website strategy gets insta-perma-banned by me.

    It is not worth my time "reading" anything that is made useless by really horrible UI choices, be it infinite scrolling or fafe-out-scrolling-click-to-continue. No, I do not want to click on anything to continue. I don't even want to see accept-cookies. Whenever such a question comes up I'd auto-say no, no pester-widget. Thankfully for the latter there are extensions available, but I have not found a strategy against the slow-fade-in-pester-strategy.

    Why can I not easily select the text I wish to copy/paste here, from that horrible website? I have no clue, but I can not invest time to investigate this. Hopefully more and more people realise that any strategy to pester people means you devalue YOUR OWN CONTENT as-is. The same applies to medium.com too - it is one reason I do not read anything from there anymore. People need to stop putting up barriers if they want people to read anything.

    • stevekempan hour ago
      "Please don't complain about tangential annoyances—e.g. article or website formats, name collisions, or back-button breakage. They're too common to be interesting."
    • r_lee2 hours ago
      > Any author who uses such a website strategy gets insta-perma-banned by me.

      can we make this into a copypasta? lol