20 pointsby Logans_Run4 hours ago4 comments
  • 3 hours ago
    undefined
  • thatonehack2 hours ago
    Of course Amazon is telling their teams to use AI; they are heavily invested in it not being a flop. More token usage metric for the hyper scalers means more traction and usage irrespective of revenue.
  • BatchJob2 hours ago
    Amazons tokenmaxxing problems are of their own making and its their money. I fail to see how Amazons opinion on much of anything is that relevant.

    Have you seen that website? While hocking sweatshop products is highly profitable, and their shipping empire is impressive if not destructive to retail shipping in general. I dont really view them as much of a software company.

    But each company will need to decide how to usa AI and if they want to publish "deep thoughts" by Amazon, Inc, its a free country.

    Personally, the people token maxxing to me are violating the ethos of what it means to be a software developer, so maybe they arent really software devs.

    I cant sum it up in a short write up, but one thing true software devs are NOT is - sheep.

    The ones that are can go back into real estate after the bust.

  • Elsewhereindeed3 hours ago
    If you click this link expecting to read the memo you'll be disappointed as its 95% about what the author thinks about it.
    • altairprime3 hours ago
      I was very glad for that! It sounds boringly useless, and the extensive response to it is much more valuable than yet another corporate memo of spendthrift-firemore.

      Edit: Yeah, it’s just stack ranking by token/use pivottable; keep your work within 1.5 stddevs of everyone else’s or get targeted. Definitely missable.

      > We recommend paying special attention to the 10th percentile (finding those teams who aren’t embracing AI effectively and understanding why) and the 90th percentile (finding those teams who are heavily using AI and understanding whether they’re seeing delivery increases to match) of AI adoption.

      • tj-teej26 minutes ago
        I'm not going to pass a judgement on whether this is a good or bad thing (disclosure I used to work there).

        But this is very Amazon. If the leadership believes AI usage is critical then they will use a blunt stack rank to identify those who aren't using it.

        I would be unsurprised to see this as an automated flag that managers have to explain during performance reviews (e.g. "this person was on Maternity leave for three months and therefore their usage is lower, but if you see XYZ data they are now on track for the months after they returned and are catching up as they adopt the new way of working")

      • Elsewhereindeedan hour ago
        They could at least post the actual memo... especially after a header that says "What's the thing say?". Bloviating clickbait nonsense like this doesn't deserve to be here.
    • alephnerd3 hours ago
      Welcome to the Register.

      Here's the actual memo - https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/company-news/amazon-softwar...

      • tgv2 hours ago
        Welcome to corporate drivel. That memo says next to nothing. I wouldn't be surprised if it had been written by some LLM. "Write it in a grand style, like Kennedy's moon speech, but don't scare the share holders."