Infinite Mac: BeOS(blog.persistent.info)
105 pointsby ecliptik6 hours ago6 comments
  • thenewwazoo3 hours ago
    > The distinctive tabbed window titles look neat, but they have a reduced draggable area, so I’d have to think harder every time I wanted to move a window.

    Now imagine macOS progressing to the point where title bars have been replaced with toolbars, and buttons no longer have borders, so you have to guess what part of the window will drag it.

    :-|

    • hadlock2 hours ago
      The feature those provide isn't immediately obvious in a static screenshot, the tabs are "magnetic" and you can take your "word" application and "stick" it's tab next to your email tab, and now you have a "tabbed application" with the email app tab on the left, and the word app tab on the right. You might have one "window" that is your front end dev workflow (firefox, vscode, 2-3 term windows) with 5 tabs, and then a second window that is your backend workflow of vscode + 4 terminal tabs, and a database workflow that is pgadmin + 2 terminal tabs. For example. I haven't seen anything like it, and I'm not sure how it handles windows with a smaller fixed window size, like winamp.
      • kalleboo2 hours ago
        > I haven't seen anything like it

        I remember using the fluxbox wm like this back on the university Sun machines

        • pjmlpan hour ago
          Also Windows was going to have this, but never left the preview builds, there was a BUILD or Ignite session were it was demoed.

          Granted it was already Windows 10, so nothing that original.

      • multiplegeorges2 hours ago
        It would just stack the windows of different sizes, so if you hit the Winamp tab the smaller Winamp tab would be at the top of the stack. Pretty simple and intuitive.

        I loved the tabs on BeOS.

    • somat2 hours ago
      I really like the linux solution here. My windows have no titlebar/borders at all. To move a window hold the window key and drag the window from anywhere, to resize hold the window key and right-click drag.

      And yes I know it's not really a linux specific thing, but that gets the point across. It is very common on linux. I could twirl my os/desktop hipster mustache and say "my obsd/spectrwm desktop handles no window chrome really well" but then I feel really pretentious instead of only slightly.

    • 44 minutes ago
      undefined
  • renehsz6 hours ago
    To anyone who hasn't already: I really recommend checking out Haiku OS [1], the FOSS successor to BeOS. It's so pleasant to use and supports a surprisingly large catalog of software.

    [1]: https://www.haiku-os.org/

    • ecliptik5 hours ago
      Claude built me a meta web/notes/code search engine with IOS and MacOS apps, and for fun I asked it to make a Haiku version [1], which it did in under 20 minutes.

      With AI I feel like a lot of these bygone-era OS's could see a whole new ecosystem of modern apps within a very short period of time.

      1. https://github.com/machiya-kobo/shiori/tree/main#haiku

      • ben_w3 hours ago
        Mmm. Or improve the OSes themselves.

        At this point, they could likely decompile MacOS classic and rework it to give it modern memory protection, virtual memory, preemptive multitasking, and networking.

        I assume booting an OS with a mere few megabytes of RAM footprint would only take milliseconds?

        • hadlock2 hours ago
          I am in the middle of doing this with apple's System 6 and adding a posix-compliant shell under the codename bluetail, and working my way up, i've got it booting with an os, busybox, openssh and stuff. Boots on a raspberry pi 3 A+ bare metal (And qemu, of course). And full usb MIDI support, because (I said so, and) there's actually an incredible catalog of early DAW software that will run on System 6. And pretty decent usb ethernet, sound, webcam etc etc. The future of hobby software is wild.
          • tomduncalf2 hours ago
            Woah I never even considered the possibly of rebooting old OS with new features. Very cool. Would love to experience that era of music tech
    • hadlock2 hours ago
      Haiku is actually pretty usable these days, someone has a draft nvidia driver that's not completely terrible (as of maybe a month ago? still very DIY but neat), and there's a surprising number of retro games and shareware in their package manager catalog these days.
  • sfblah5 hours ago
    I would be very interested in a writeup that talked about the likely trajectory of Apple's OS if they had bought BeOS instead.
    • ndiddy4 hours ago
      Some former Be employees have commented here in the past saying that Apple made the right decision to buy Next and not Be from a technical perspective, as BeOS had poor code quality and was far behind NEXTSTEP in important areas like networking and printing. They also implemented the OS API directly in C++, which tied them to a specific C++ compiler (some mid-90s version of GCC) due to the ABI getting broken in newer versions. The 32-bit version of Haiku (modern BeOS reimplementation) supports BeOS software, and as a result still needs to be compiled with that mid-90s GCC release.

      Beyond that, I'm not sure if buying Be would have fixed the managerial problems at Apple. Would they have been able to add the required features to BeOS to turn it into a production OS without the project turning into another Copland? Would the existing Apple management have slimmed down the massive Apple product line that had dozens of nearly identical models? Would it have gotten rid of dead-end projects like Newton and Pippin? Etc.

      • AshamedCaptaina few seconds ago
        I'll note that Mac OS X used a C++ ABI in the _kernel_....
      • timschmidt7 minutes ago
        One minor correction: the Haiku developers worked some magic with GCC binary compatibility and modern Haiku builds are done with a modern GCC yet still preserve the ability to run and interoperate with software built using the old release which is important for preserving the use of commercial software built for BeOS without released source code.
      • diskzero17 minutes ago
        Former Be person here. Excellent summary. To further elucidate the management issue, some of the Be management went to Palm and they weren’t super effective there either. A fun alternative universe would be Apple buying Be, Apple going bankrupt or eaten by the clones, NeXT powering the internet with WebObjects, Microsoft crushed by antitrust and we are all running Linux using Eazel/GNOME.
      • WillAdams2 hours ago
        Best example of how far BeOs fell short was that for a very long while it lacked printer drivers of any kind --- by contrast, not only did NeXTstep essentially get printing "for free" since it used Display PostScript, the implementation of that was such that Adobe demanded a modification to the user agreement limiting the output resolution so that print shops would not be able to purchase NeXT computers and use them as RIPs for imagesetters.
      • tialaramex3 hours ago
        Pre-standard C++ is an even worse programming language than C++ 98, but also the big difference wouldn't have been the technology, it was the people. If Apple buy Be Inc they're getting JLG back whereas if they buy NeXT they get Jobs back.

        Jobs is what makes or breaks Apple in that critical period. I didn't like him but that's relevant to the success of the company. JLG did not have whatever it was Jobs gave the company.

        • smithbits6 minutes ago
          And Jobs brought an entire team of people with him. Many of the top people at Apple got replaced by people from NeXT. Avie Tevanian, Craig Federighi, Bertrand Serlet and many lesser known names came from NeXT. The joke at the time was that NeXT bought Apple for -$400M.
      • diskzero13 minutes ago
        > They also implemented the OS API directly in C++, which tied them to a specific C++ compiler

        We paid Cygnus(?) millions for that. The multiple virtual inheritance needed for MediaKit was a real joy to get working.

      • wmf3 hours ago
        It was reported that Apple offered $75M for Be and almost $500M for NeXT and in retrospect those seem like entirely fair valuations. One was a mature OS and the other was a demo of an OS.
        • diskzero9 minutes ago
          JLG countered with a $100 million and I thought Apple offered Steve $400 million at first. There was a moment when Apple was just talking to us (Be) and Steve heard about it. Bummed.
    • pjmlp4 hours ago
      They probably would fail to recover and be another historical company by now.

      If not, desktop computing would be taken over by C++ as main systems programming language, and UNIX like computing relegated to servers.

      • tialaramex3 hours ago
        Outside of the GUI, Be is a very thin veneer over Unix. There is, no joke, a class named "BStatable" which, if you know some Unix, is just stat, because of course what their OS kernel implements is just stat.

        In the places where there's something entirely different going on, such as networking in earlier BeOS, it's trash and you'd obviously want to throw it away and do what Unix did - Be were doing so. So a hypothetical turn of the century fruit-flavour BeOS is probably much closer to "Unix with a different UI" than you're thinking. NeXT changed nothing there.

        • pjmlp3 hours ago
          It certainly wasn't on the BeOS R5 CD that was available back in the day, or the whole Kits available for BeOs programming in C++.

          The amount of work done by Haiku to provide a proper POSIX userspace support proves the point.

    • walrus012 hours ago
      It would have been a disaster, BeOS was significantly different from a NeXT/BSD-like unix type base that made it relatively easy for software to be developed on MacOS in the 10.0 to 10.4 era. Early versions of MacOS X like 10.0 were clearly just an evolved NeXT with a cute MacOS finder like skin on top.
  • watersb2 hours ago
    I used a BeOS inspired GNOME extension or hack for tabbed windows, signature yellow color, about 20 years ago. Loved it.

    I was installing GNOME pieces compiling from source, on top of Sun Solaris. So it was a weird configuration. But FWIW I relied on the tabs a lot.

    • jonhohle2 hours ago
      Were the tabs movable like on BeOS? That’s something I cannot recall seeing in any theme.
  • Singletail5 hours ago
    I loved my BeBox, but what would be the modern equivalent of the GeekPort? I've been using esp32/nRF52/etc boards for uart/spi/i2c/i2s/pwm-type work... it feels like hardware hacking on a desktop is a lost art.
    • Narishma4 hours ago
      The closest modern thing to it is probably the Raspberry Pi GPIO header.
    • ndiddy3 hours ago
      The old school way to do I/O on desktop was via the parallel port, which I imagine would still work if you get a PCIe parallel port card. For a more modern way, the FT232H chip supports UART, SPI, I2C, JTAG and raw GPIO over USB, and there are break-out boards available.
      • detourdog3 hours ago
        I was going to say this as well the GeekPort was a parallel port. I always thought it was marketed that way is that Macs didn’t have a parallel port. Having a parallel port would make the spec sheet seem regressive. I believe serial ports were always faster than parallel ports. I bought a BeBox at the time.

        The original Nike store in NYC purchased one to do their signage media playback. It didn’t go well.

      • WillAdams2 hours ago
        This is still an on-going thing for the LinuxCNC project (which mostly follows Mach3 in using a Parallel port interface to drive a CNC controller).
  • tonymetan hour ago
    I ran BeOS for a bit, and it was the best OS upgrade experience I've had, besides the Windows 95 to NT 4.0 upgrade.

    One of the few upgrade experiences that was a discernable improvement and completely revised experience.