77 pointsby Frieren7 hours ago25 comments
  • Refreeze52246 hours ago
    I no longer trust Proton after reading this. Chen seems like he has lost what the entire point of Protonmail was supposed to be, and now wants to become one of the Big Tech companies they were built to be an alternative to. He also seems like a two-faced bully.

    Email (and VPN, password manager, etc.) is far too sensitive to go as all-in as they want to do on AI. I've been using Tuta in parallel with Proton, and I will probably migrate over completely soon

    • alexgieg29 minutes ago
      Replying here so it's close to the top (sorry):

      What do people recommend as truly good alternatives? Particularly non-American ones due to Snowden's revelations etc. etc.

    • iainctduncan6 hours ago
      almost like he's a ... CEO. sigh
  • pier256 hours ago
    > “Due to insufficient velocity,” Proton is not on track to achieve its annual recurring revenue target by the end of the year

    I'm a Proton customer and other than some UX improvements I'm not missing any big features. This idea they need more velocity is a failure in management.

    • marginalia_nu3 hours ago
      Yeah chasing velocity like that is for startups. Proton already has a product, a competent team, and (had) a lot of soft capital in the form of a good trusted name and goodwill.

      That's enough momentum to coast on for a very long time, especially since their whole deal is that they're owned by a nonprofit and don't even have shareholders to pressure them.

      They really had to nothing and they'd won, the only way to lose in a situation like that is... exactly this. Andy could have probably just sat on his ass for 20 years like Gabe Newell and probably been able to buy a similar yacht at the end of it.

      • pier25an hour ago
        > and (had) a lot of soft capital in the form of a good trusted name and goodwill

        "had" is the right word.

    • Refreeze52246 hours ago
      This. I don't want some huge "business productivity suite", or whatever other crap they've been building lately. I paid initially Proton for secure email that wasn't being mined for adds. Now they have chatbots and who knows what else in the works, and are simply trying to chase revenue. Pass.
      • lifestyleguru6 hours ago
        Opposite, I wish there existed non FAANG, non Cloud Act suite with video calls, VPN, object storage. Even if it would probably compromise privacy in different ways, it would be good at least for diversification. Proton does it to a certain extend. Secure email alone is not such a big problem, you'll easily find 5-6 cheap solid providers based in Europe.
  • hebleb5 hours ago
    If my CEO called me a loser for trying to enforce some level of quality, I would start looking for a new job immediately
  • howdyhowdy5 hours ago
    Look. I just want an email provider that pays enough dues to the smtp mafia so my personal correspondence doesn't hit spam or bounce. Why. Why can't just email be straightforward and transactional.
  • lioetersan hour ago
    The CEO posted in a company chat that pentesting newly written code before pushing it live is "bullshit and loser thinking".

    Sounds so juvenile, worse than a teenager. Unfit for running a company dealing with secure mail.

  • ikesau6 hours ago
    This looks really bad. I would hate to work at a place with leadership and morale like that.

    I guess I don't understand Proton's financial position. Are they not owned by the non-profit Proton Foundation? Why can they not just have slow and steady growth with an emphasis on security and quality?

  • hurfdurf6 hours ago
    Proton to 'Re-Interview' Staff About AI to See Who Gets to Keep Their Job ( https://www.404media.co/proton-to-re-interview-staff-about-a... ) 85 points | 3 days ago | 42 comments https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50251062
  • ada-h00k5 hours ago
    This really undermines trust in Proton, not just from a data privacy perspective, but also simply in terms of security and reliability. If they don't issue a statement proving that this is all just made up, or announcing that they're firing the CEO and restructuring the company, I'll switch to another provider in the long run.
  • marginalia_nu4 hours ago
    Can't imagine the company surviving if Andy is allowed to stay on as CEO. A company like Proton lives and dies by its reputation, trust, and goodwill. Given their mission and brand, this is spectacularly tone deaf and jeopardizes everything they've spent over a decade building up.

    Only thing that might save their face is kicking Andy and following up with Japanese levels of corporate apologizing.

  • a34729t3 hours ago
    Well, that makes me feel better about not migrating to proton recently. Dream was nice while the mask stayed on.
  • bcvvvy6 hours ago
    Not sure why the hell you'd trust Proton in the first place? What they sell is some loose guarantees slapped on a completely insecure protocol with many footguns lying around.

    Now we know it's run by a dick too.

    They sold fear. That was all.

  • 5 hours ago
    undefined
  • phoronixrly6 hours ago
    > His ultimate message for the team was to “stop lovingly handcrafting all our code and use AI more.”

    What more is there to say?

    • anonymousab3 hours ago
      The real kicker is that he sees any thorough human review of security critical code - even if that code is 100% AI generated - as "handcrafting code".

      You just can't trust software being developed under such a man's leadership to be secure. It's a fatal mark against their raison d'etre.

  • 6 hours ago
    undefined
  • bhrladyan hour ago
    "Yen was not happy that Proton was drawing attention to this limitation."

    This has always been the case. Lack of transparency and dishonest, overzealous marketing.

    I use Fastmail because they are at least honest about their limitations and Proton is completely overhyped in terms of the genuine privacy and security of their products. Good to know that beyond being mediocre they've confirmed it's all increasingly AI slop: "Ninety percent of code at Proton in October was written by AI"

    Never trusted this company because of Andy, and never will.

  • tabiv2 hours ago
    I just want to pay someone and then get a reliable email service in reuturn. Why do we need all of this velocity, productivity BS.
  • taurath5 hours ago
    This is happening in so many companies - executives and cult-like technical leadership are still touting lines of code as being indicative of productivity while their engineering teams lose coherence around their products.
  • athst5 hours ago
    As a Proton customer, this is disappointing to hear that it's like this, because I definitely got the sense that it's a company that would operate differently. It actually sounds (unfortunately) like the culture of a lot of the places I've worked...

    On the other hand, I do see the situation their leadership is in, even though they're not handling it in a respectful way. If the company needs to provide competitive services vs. everyone else who is using AI, they're just going to get left behind. And even for security: like if their engineers are skeptical about adopting AI how can they protect their system in a world with Mythos and all other kinds of AI running around attacking them? I imagine their product would attract employees who are more skeptical about AI, which is hard to change . They need to find a balance between keeping with the spirit and principles of their product but not be in denial about the new world we live in.

    • BoofMcQueen424 hours ago
      > If the company needs to provide competitive services vs. everyone else who is using AI, they're just going to get left behind

      Why not just build a damn good product that has a steady revenue stream? You don’t have to compete in a race to the bottom. There are other ways.

      My email provider is boring. They do email and nothing else. Feature development is glacial but reliable. I doubt they’re rich. I doubt they’re tripling their ARR. But they have a stable business as best as I can tell and seem happy with it.

      This whole “the only way to compete is to eat the world” is stupid and only makes things worse.

      • 2 hours ago
        undefined
    • g-b-r2 hours ago
      > And even for security: like if their engineers are skeptical about adopting AI how can they protect their system in a world with Mythos and all other kinds of AI running around attacking them

      Rotfl there's even this idea that you need vibecoded crap to resist Mythos? Oh my freaking god.

  • didacusc6 hours ago
    I've just renewed my two year sub. Auto-renewal to be switched off imminently. This is terrible.
  • lifestyleguru6 hours ago
    Having aimed at emigration to Switzerland once I only made myself sure I don't want to live there. Attracts too many too ambitious types. Anyway, using Swiss services does not mean that you are renting a safe deposit in their bunker.
  • stego-tech4 hours ago
    Dude, all I want is a private and secure email provider. That’s it. That’s what I pay for.

    Everything else - and I mean everything else - is ancillary to that core function. Seeing a CEO openly throw security out the window in favor of Big Tech’s latest drug addiction is bad enough, but the CEO of a company whose entire reputation is bucking Big Tech? Inexcusable.

    Already looking for exit strategies. I don’t want to give this prick one red cent of my money.

    • mynameisash3 hours ago
      > Already looking for exit strategies.

      Leaving Proton has been in the back of my mind for a while, and this is probably the last straw for me. I've previously heard that Fastmail is good, but I'm interested in what others are doing. I agree with you that email privacy and security are top of the list. I don't care about a private AI feature (eg, Proton's Lumo), and I don't need their productivity suite (docs, sheets, meetings). Just do one thing really well.

      Looking for others' input on the right way to offboard from Proton.

  • fzeroracer6 hours ago
    Very funny to compare this with the posts just a few days ago [1] where they announced they were reinterviewing folks to lay then off if they weren't sufficiently on the AI train.

    Almost like where there's smoke, there's fire.

    [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50251062

  • lbrito4 hours ago
    "[not having AI psychosis is] bullshit and loser thinking."

    Seems like dhh has a new pupil

  • stefantalpalaru4 hours ago
    [dead]