181 pointsby austinallegro9 hours ago14 comments
  • darkamaul6 hours ago
    Orange is a legend and this chain is extremely impressive here.

    No memory corruptions, no heap shenanigans, just pure logic bugs, almost made easy to understand for the reader.

    As a bonus, they also posted a reverse chain: popping Edge from calc [0].

    [0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bh1zglq4mLE

  • mschuster91a minute ago
    Oh dear god, at each further chain link I was laughing so hard that my poor cats got disturbed!

    This entire chain is nothing but a lesson of shame for Microsoft - if you fork a thing, better be prepared to thoroughly understand and review each corner you touch. Or you might miss important cross-references that you should update but that aren't mentioned in comments by the original developers.

    As for the "sign in automatically" BS that both Google and Edge push - that can go and die in a hellfire where it belongs.

  • its-summertime7 hours ago
    I always felt bad about the whole site/browser cross integration that chrome and edge and others do. Now I feel really really really bad about it. Can almost see the marketing team's emails about what features to add, and the developers unwantingly writing the code not expecting such things to open so many holes
    • xnickb3 hours ago
      I think they very well understand that this code was full of bugs but no one cared. Likely was assigned to some junior who was making an entry into the team/repos as a non-critical task.

      And it's hard to judge them: I'd also rather focus on real features.

    • imtringued9 minutes ago
      What?

      Special casing your domains to be assumed "secure" is exactly how you build vulnerabilities directly into your software.

      It's an inevitable result.

      Developers aren't aware because they assume a security model where the special casing is disabled.

  • adzman hour ago
    > with a simple fetch(...) with credentials included, you can easily grab any Microsoft Edge user’s email from any website

    Wow, this is disturbing on its own

  • antonly3 hours ago
    It's very refreshing to read such clearly written and concise technical reports.
    • layer82 hours ago
      No “here’s why it matters” and friends, thankfully.
  • deburo2 hours ago
    I guess that explains the questions I had when I was mysteriously logged into Edge. I checked whether Chrome does something similar, and it can, but the setting "Sign in to Chrome when you sign in to other Google services" was set to "Don't sign in", so I'm not sure whether this is the default or not.
  • tveita4 hours ago
    > So even if you’ve never created a User Profile in the browser, just visiting www.microsoft.com is enough for Edge to create one and sign you in automatically.

    This is disgusting behaviour, RCE chain or not.

  • 4 hours ago
    undefined
  • zhiyan7 hours ago
    human craft is becoming rare these days
    • Geezus_426 hours ago
      Has been for a long time.
    • cubefox5 hours ago
      It's more that LLMs increasingly outperform humans in finding vulnerabilities, so the share of human discoveries goes down.
      • account423 hours ago
        That's downplaying how LLMs discourage humans from thinking themselves by providing an easier "good enough" path.
        • LoganDarkan hour ago
          seconding this. it's even worse for those with executive dysfunction where it becomes too difficult to force one's self to continue taking what is now the long way around. even if you could do it so much better with time and practice.
        • cubefox3 hours ago
          That's downplaying the massive increase in LLM capabilities relative to the modest decrease in human capabilities.
          • ShinyLeftPadan hour ago
            That's downplaying the importance of human capabilities.
  • Vaushite2 hours ago
    This is very awesome and cool.
  • sharpshadow5 hours ago
    The popup nightmare never stops.
  • breakingcups6 hours ago
    This is amazing work.
  • berofeev6 hours ago
    Excellent write up
  • cyclopeanutopia6 hours ago
    Stopped at

    > I won’t go into too much detail in this post, because I think in this era, you can just ask your agents to fill in the details :)

    • russelg5 hours ago
      If you can understand nuance and context, you would realise the phrase right before that is saying that he's not going to go into details about how navigation itself works in Chrome/Edge, and to watch the presentation from Google itself about those specific details if you are so inclined.

      If you then continued on to read the remainder of the article, you would also discover that there was no AI assistance in this research at all.

    • est6 hours ago
      It's your loss. The whole article is very good written.
      • ncruces5 hours ago
        And much better for not going into needless detail.

        In fact, a problem with LLMs is that they consistently write more than I want to read.

    • maeln6 hours ago
      The article does actually go pretty in detail about the exploit.
    • MonkeyClub6 hours ago
      Same; either put in the work to think it through and show us your thought process and conclusions, or just post your prompts and call it a day and everyone gets to move on.
      • russelg5 hours ago
        If you continued to read the article, you would discover that he indeed goes through his entire thought process in building this chain. Including the fact this was done with no AI assistance at all.
        • MonkeyClub5 hours ago
          I stand corrected then, I’ll return to it!
      • tsujamin6 hours ago
        Imagine missing such a great bug-chain because an off-hand AI comment at the start put you off