11 pointsby brandonb6 hours ago6 comments
  • brandonb6 hours ago
    The 55 mg/dL target in this study is somewhere between the 1st and 5th percentile.

    70 mg/dL (the control) is around the 10th percentile.

    IMO, surprising that reductions at the low end still seem to yield such large benefits. I'd expect it to saturate much earlier.

  • jvanderbot2 hours ago
    Outlive is an excellent book, and one of the excellent discussions in that book is that there is no safe level of certain kinds of cholesterol. The details are fun do read up on.

    It's somewhat bombastic, but a really excellent book for overall "next generation" health.

    • yfw3 minutes ago
      He also recommends people take rapamycin for longevity...
    • DANmode2 hours ago
      Perhaps cholesterol is a (protective?) substance associated with a problem,

      not the problem in and of itself.

  • 3 hours ago
    undefined
  • westurner3 hours ago
    ScholarlyArticle: "Intensive LDL Cholesterol Targeting in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease" (2026) https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2600283
    • westurner3 hours ago
      Do they control for arterial calcification?

      Mentioning this again: Cyclodextrin apparently effectively treats atherosclerosis and arteriosclerosis. [1][2]

      [1] "AI analysis of CT scans finds 42.9% of patients have coronary inflammation" https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50202532 :

      > Can Beta-Cyclodextrin treat (calcified) atherosclerotic plaques? And gout?

      > What percentage of cardiovascular "plaque" is sugar alcohol and thus apparently treatable with β or α cyclodextrin, in controls and patients with conditions like Arteriosclerosis and Atherosclerosis?

      [2] "Cyclodextrin promotes atherosclerosis regression via macrophage reprogramming" (2016) https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/scitranslmed.aad6100

  • westurner3 hours ago
    Do steak and pork from Cheesecake Factory have cholesterol?
  • aaron6953 hours ago
    [dead]