35 pointsby alansaberan hour ago10 comments
  • barrrralda few seconds ago
    Cool idea but I can't find anywhere on the linked page to try it? It reads like a neat concept but it's not clear if this is a thing they've actually made or not (or am I just missing something super obvious?)
  • TomAbel17 minutes ago
    Reminds me of a similar project for french law

    French bills evolution versioned in git and visualized The Law Factory: french bills as git, opendata and dataviz https://www.lafabriquedelaloi.fr/

    "Law is Code" on The Law Factory: french bills as git, opendata and dataviz - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7817357 May 2014 (0 comments)

  • burnJS10 minutes ago
    I had this idea over 10 years ago but never finished it. I hope this takes off. I do fear it's not very practical for many big pieces of legislation which are often written in secret.
    • Ericson23142 minutes ago
      Don't worry about that. Even if we only saw voted-upon revisions in the Git history, it will still be a huge improvement.

      Version control for the public parts will make both public and secretive law-drafting better.

  • countersa minute ago
    Major party foul for not calling this "legitslate"
  • xlayn10 minutes ago
    YES PLEASE, but I suspect it will degenerate into another paid service with 1000 tiers... I think you cannot access the US law without paying for it? odd... I will wait for claude law to appear and hope they share the torrent...
    • Matticus_Rex2 minutes ago
      Legislation you can generally access for free. Case law you often cannot.
  • mushufasa39 minutes ago
    I'm not an expert in this domain but I'm aware there has been prior work to attempt this. I'd appreciate if someone knowledgeable could post some of that context.
  • 7kago_yomi25 minutes ago
    Unlike code, natural language laws have many exceptions and context dependencies, so trying to manage them cleanly with Git seems like it would be tough as data structuring costs and exception handling (hardcode-style responses) increase.
    • JumpCrisscross22 minutes ago
      > natural language laws have many exceptions and context dependencies

      The complexity is in common law, not natural-language laws.

      The U.S. Code and Code of Federal Regulations can be completely presented through a Git-like system. The complexity comes in when attaching court cases.

      • 7kago_yomi13 minutes ago
        I see. The laws are completely different from my country, so this is very educational. My country uses civil law, but I see that is how it is under common law. Thank you very much.
  • iAMkenough8 minutes ago
    Sounds neat, but not something a private company should be responsible for.

    If transparency is the goal, the entire codebase for this should be public domain and not profitable. Otherwise there's a profit motive to rewrite history.

  • infogulch27 minutes ago
    [dead]
  • octoberfranklin42 minutes ago
    Fraudulent title, you can't git-clone this.
    • doezi25 minutes ago
      Not really. It is arguing for version controlled legislation. So who’s responsible for what portions of literal laws and policy. I hope your "not clone-able" is in jest
      • JumpCrisscross21 minutes ago
        > who’s responsible for what portions of literal laws and policy

        This makes sense for bills. It doesn't for laws. Once a bill is a law, it's the will of the Congress.

        • dathanb826 minutes ago
          That’s like saying that the code in a repo belongs to the whole team once a PR is merged, so it doesn’t make sense to track its provenance back to its original authors.
        • rileymat217 minutes ago
          You could tag yes/no/abstains to it.