42 pointsby tysone6 hours ago7 comments
  • silverFork6 hours ago
    That is result of some really insane laws that has been written about a million times. They have known that zillionaires are using it to avoid paying taxes altogether, even after death.
  • karmajunkie4 hours ago
    as soon as wealth of any sort is collateralized the tax code should treat it as liquid and tax it. preferably heavily.
    • whatever12 hours ago
      Yeah if you borrow against it, IT IS REAL. The lender considered it real!
    • silverFork4 hours ago
      If they forced sell any stock that is has been held for more than a year on random dates and bought them back automatically, the whole scheme will be done for.
    • mindslight4 hours ago
      Exactly. This is how IRAs already work. Taking a loan (beyond your basis) should count as realized income (while also adjusting your cost basis).
  • ctchocula2 hours ago
    The headline is editorialized way beyond what the article is about:

    > A new survey of 57 of the world’s biggest private banks and other lenders, conducted by Deloitte and reviewed by The Wall Street Journal, offers the fullest picture yet of this opaque corner of finance. Banks don’t always break out such lending on their balance sheets, and there is no central tally of how much is outstanding. The report finds that stock-based lending, better known as Lombard loans to borrowers in Europe and Asia, is increasingly available to those lower down the wealth scale.

    > ...

    > In mid-October, Charles Schwab said its pledged asset line product available to people with at least $100,000 in nonretirement assets drove a 35% surge in bank-loan balances, to $72.3 billion in the third quarter. A spokeswoman said usage grew after Schwab launched a fully digital process three years ago that can get the loans approved within minutes.

    Mixing "buy, borrow and die" up with a pledged asset line is ridiculous and clickbait to the point of disrespect for the reader's intelligence. The former is a boutique product used by the uber-rich (net worth in 9 figures minimum) to get around estate tax. They're certainly not using a pledged asset line, which is available to you and me but doesn't do anything for estate taxes.

    The cynical read into this is WSJ is trying to whitewash the "buy, borrow and die" strategy using "hey, if the same strategy available to the plebs, then it must be morally justified, right?"

  • IncreasePosts3 hours ago
    Won't the people using this strategy end up paying a lot more (in terms of percent ownership of their holdings) in an extended downturn?
  • feverzsj3 hours ago
    Finance capitalism, the root of all evil.
  • yieldcrv5 hours ago
    the financial sector is an ongoing construction project, going the direction of all items having an easy way to be valued to the minute, with the merchant and reseller having the same price instead of a wildly different one, all items then being able to be used as collateral instantly, fractionally sold as shares, and with a derivatives market on top

    this project is not done, it’s not close to done, but improvements in this space have led to more people being able to access this lending market

    I see that improving beyond publicly traded equity and real estate