If the LLM reached 95% accuracy and humans typically hit below 90% accuracy, then it would be demonstrable in court that the accountant who didn't utilize AI or use it as a basis for their marginal enhancements past 95% accuracy was negligent.

AI is coming for everything even if it can't do any of them well. Why? Because it provides the illusion of a promise which business leaders, finance bros, and the management class struggle to resist. The idea that they can eliminate the inconveniences of relying on humans is like a Venus fly trap for corporate dollars. Deep down, these people resent needing those they consider lesser than they are, hence AI will come after accounting and bookkeeping if it hasn't already. The only thing that may temporarily save jobs like accounting (and even programming) is a total economic crashout that occurs when cash flow from shaking down the post-GenX middle class becomes too low.

undefined