R/opensource bans AI-made and AI-focused projects and non-English speakers(www.tomshardware.com)
17 pointsby NordStreamYacht5 hours ago6 comments
  • lincon1272 hours ago
    I don't really see how this is news. All the main English subreddit are... well, English only.

    The other stipulations seem reasonable.

    • dadouman hour ago
      The thing is that Reddit on mobile pushes automated translations so hard that a lot of people are mislead into forgetting about the actual language of the subreddit. I think that's the main reason why a lot of people are posting in their own language on Reddit nowadays.
  • 220hertz4 hours ago
    Then let the doors be shut on them so they may play the fool nowhere but in their own house!
  • calvinmorrison4 hours ago
    no-true-open-source
  • prologic5 hours ago
    I'm sorry, non-English speakers too?! da actual fuq?!
    • _aavaa_4 hours ago
      > The policy also tells people who do not speak English to find another community, arguing that moderators cannot reliably distinguish AI-written English from AI-translated text.

      I don't know if they'll outright ban posts in other languages, but it sounds like AI-translations are banned for the same reason that AI-written content is banned.

      • 2 hours ago
        undefined
      • prologic4 hours ago
        Don't you think it's pretty discriminatory to outright ban non-English speakers, even if said person(s) use AI to help translate their "ideas"?
        • account423 hours ago
          No, humans can learn to read and write english themselves and in fact most do that in school since its the lingua franca of the computing age. Not every community needs to include every last person on the planet.
        • _aavaa_4 hours ago
          My point wasn’t whether it’s discriminatory or not. I’m saying that their stance appears to be “no-AI, for any reason”.

          I agree that it impacts non-English speakers more. But what is the solution here? How would one, as a moderator, stop the AI slop they want to get rid of, if they provide a carve out for anyone claiming to be a non-native speaker?

          • prologic3 hours ago
            It's a good question. If by "AI Slop" you mean, you ask ChatGPt to translate something from your native tongue to English so you can participate in a Reddit forum and the result is, probably correct, but a lot of "unwanted test you didn't ask for"?

            What if it were you or me (I'm a native English speaker). Why if the tables were turned the other way around? I'm not even sure how I'd honestly be able to communicate with a person say from France, as I know a lick of French really, so I'd be reaching for some kind of translator, anything really. How do I avoid the wrath of those that would ben me over "AI Slop"?!

            • ndriscoll3 hours ago
              Assuming they allow it, post your thoughts in the language you form them in. Browsers have local translation built in now. The Babel Fish goes in your ear, not your mouth.
            • _aavaa_3 hours ago
              Some repos also ban ai translatations, and explicitly require non-english speakers to write in their native language, then the reader can translate.

              > If by "AI Slop" you mean

              It sounds like you're taking this the wrong way.

              My point is: they have problems with people posting too much AI slop. Native speakers, or even proficient speakers, (well readers) can tell the difference between ai slop and non-slop. So they could at least in theory know if the content they're about to post is slop and change it.

              Non-native speakers cannot tell if the thing the AI spit out is as articulate as they were in their nature language, or if it's turned it into English slop.

              Then it gets posted to reddit. How does a reddit mod differentiate <someone who just generated slop and posted it> from <non native speaker who used AI to write in English, but ended up with slop since they can't very the result>? My point is that you can't differentiate the too, certainly not when the first group can claim their non-native speakers. So the only workable option here is for non-native speakers to post in their language and for the readers to translate on their end. This, mind you, is how several social media platforms already work,

              • prologic3 hours ago
                What do you define as "AI Slop"?
                • _aavaa_3 hours ago
                  We can disagree on exact term, but for me the following is good enough: text you didn’t write, did not review, or that you cannot adequately review given your grasp on the language or the concepts.

                  But that’s irrelevant. Post in your own language and let others translate.

    • babu_mick4 hours ago
      ya throwing that in there is pretty wild/odd.
  • N_Lens5 hours ago
    Obvious reactionary faux pas on part of the moderation team, since it's exclusionary, easily gamed, and punishes & drives away honest people. Not the sharpest minds at work here.
    • pixl974 hours ago
      What's really fun is when you get people pushing stupid rules like this is to play the side for more moderation and harder crackdowns. Set up tons of sockpuppets to call everything AI and make false accusations. Attack the people that are providing the most value to the subreddit/forum till they leave and watch the entire thing collapse.

      This is how think tanks destroy most movements these days. Don't go against the movement, go for the movement so much that it drives everyone else away.

      • account423 hours ago
        Or you could be a decent person, respect their wishes to have an AI-free space and go somewhere else if that is not what you want yourself?
        • tick_tock_tick2 hours ago
          Why not just fix the space itself? Internet janitors who don't know their place our curse upon any hope of a reasonably functioning community.

          And I say that with no disrespect to real janitors calling perpetually online Reddit users "moderators" is just enabling their LARPing.

        • pixl972 hours ago
          I mean, murderers could decide not to murder other people, yet they don't. Dealing with the is/ought problem sucks.

          You live in an adversarial world. You must design systems to survive adversarial actors or the systems will collapse. It's very difficult to control people that just want to be assholes, you have to make resilient systems against assholes and that means you can't do whatever you want.

    • DrMandalay5 hours ago
      Classic Reddit mods. They've ruined that platform beyond repair.