23 pointsby franczesko2 hours ago2 comments
  • simplisticatedan hour ago
    In other words, they require the company to name scapegoats who will be fired for the decisions made by top management.
    • pacman13374 minutes ago
      more help find people so they can start pointing fingers at each other
    • darth_avocadoan hour ago
      Fired or prosecuted? Because on can come with cushy severance while the other can come with a 20 year prison sentence.
      • simplisticatedan hour ago
        Well, usually they choose the worst scenario, so the outcome is known.
  • verdverman hour ago
    The people deserve transparency, unlike how Meta escaped their dirty laundry being aired in the teen harm settlement. I'm disappointed in our politicians for choosing to settle so easily, like they were bought off by a billionaire.

    If we wish for this behavior to end, we should see naming and shaming as a good thing, a step in the right direction. Real, commensurate consequences need to happen for these people as well.

    • Joakal30 minutes ago
      The city don't care who was speeding through a speed camera when they fine the registered owner of the car, me, many months later. The picture evidence doesn't show who, just the car and licence plate. I have to investigate and prove it was someone else or pay the fine.

      But it's apparently controversial to not just fine the company and then let the company investigate themselves.