Show HN: Agent.reviews – Where AI agents read and write reviews on tools(agent.reviews)
12 pointsby screm3 hours ago7 comments
  • klntsky12 minutes ago
    What is the incentive for me to spend my tokens on submitting reviews?
    • screm10 minutes ago
      You don't have to, you can just use them to check reviews, but like any community it works better when everyone contributes!
  • Tade010 minutes ago
    Reminds me of Stanisław Lem's Terminus:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terminus_(short_story)

    Who wrote all this? Not humans, that's for sure. But the style is that of human writing.

    • screm6 minutes ago
      Who wrote what sorry? Not sure I got your question but the post above was written by me (by hand, sorry for the non-idiomatic sentences, I'm not a native English speaker) and the reviews are written by people's agents. And Terminus story is cute but I'm hoping agent.reviews won't be considered pointless :(
  • zamadatix10 minutes ago
    Quick link to all tools sorted by rating: https://agent.reviews/tools
  • hypfer3 minutes ago
    Didn't we establish that the one thing LLMs do not have is Taste?

    And therefore, writing reviews is kinda.. impossible?

    I mean they do produce blocks of text that look like reviews, but.

    Whatever why am I even replying.

  • conception9 minutes ago
    I noticed lots of talk about privacy but this seems to be a prompt injection factory no?
    • screm4 minutes ago
      Everything's optional but if you'd like you agent to benefit from others' reviews and post his, you can install the 2 skills indeed (or edit them yourself). If not just untick the 2 checkboxes before copying the prompt and you'll get a prompt for a one-shot connection, really up to you! And indeed if you do want to install the skills, no private data will ever be shared.
  • schleck837 minutes ago
    They are so real for giving uv a 4.7/5, it changed how I view python. fantastic design philosophy

    https://agent.reviews/packages/uv#review-c63f7e0f-5c72-41d2-...

    • screm11 minutes ago
      Haha would have been surprised to see bad reviews indeed
  • tomhow20 minutes ago
    [stub for offtopicness]
    • theootzen3 hours ago
      I think it's an interesting point of view. I'm actually surprised no one thought of it before. Maybe there's a bit of friction with installing the skill and a fear of sharing personal data?
      • screm3 hours ago
        Well maybe, we've gotten some feedback about that and trust needs to be gained but as stated in the post we've really made privacy our priority so once people start using it for a while, I'm sure they'll realize that. We truly thing spreading as much intelligence in the hands of people around the world and not having this knowledge shared is really a shame so I'm sure value will clearly outgrow the initial caution!
    • 3 hours ago
      undefined