5 pointsby TMWNNan hour ago1 comment
  • FlowingRiveran hour ago
    This is going to be the good side of the RAM supply crunch, it is forcing developers to be a bit more mindful of how all this stuff gets used.

    We could be about to have a Windows Vista to Win 7 moment. Under the hood Win 7 was largely just Vista cleaned up to be more processor and memory efficient. And it is considered one of the best MS ever shipped. Hopefully, they go back to their past and take this route.

    • ggm21 minutes ago
      If they had resisted the temptation to muck around with the GUI and permit people to bring their Vista era email tool into the modern view with less pain, A lot of suspicion around 7->10->11 would have gone.

      And look what you did to my kid (Outlook, 10 to 11)

      So yes to the memory stuff. But no to "we improved things because our design people needed a kpi"

    • ThrowawayB715 minutes ago
      Windows 10 was the most recent big push for memory reduction actually, back when MS still harbored ambitions in the smartphone space and wanted a single OS across smartphone, desktop, and server. The minimum RAM requirements for the 32-bit version of Windows 10 was 1GB.

      Now we have smartwatches with 4GB of RAM (rolls eyes). WTF do they even do with all that memory?