64 pointsby tosh15 hours ago4 comments
  • satvikpendem13 hours ago
    How does this compare to facet [0][1] by fasterthanlime? Seems some of the reasoning is similar especially for compile time bloat.

    [0] https://facet.rs

    [1] https://fasterthanli.me/articles/introducing-facet-reflectio...

    • nicoburns13 hours ago
      Facet set out to compile faster, but AFAIK it never actually achieved that goal.
    • jauntywundrkind13 hours ago
      [flagged]
  • hailong_s10 hours ago
    [flagged]
  • ramon15614 hours ago
    next time just write the post yourself. I don't need an entire paragraph to explain that deser = serde but reshuffled
    • qchris13 hours ago
      I'm not sure if this author used an LLM, but I think you've misunderstood that paragraph. At worst, the line you're referencing is a tongue-in-check little introduction into a paragraph that describes the top-level differences in approach to serialization that the two libraries take.
    • 3 hours ago
      undefined
    • ydj12 hours ago
      deser might also just be deserialize shortened, and I was wondering if it was something focused on deserialization only. As such, I didn’t find a quick little note on the etymology to be a particularly egregious waste of words.
      • 9 hours ago
        undefined
  • duhhhhh121213 hours ago
    • the_mitsuhiko5 hours ago
      I think this is a case of pangram's attribution being confused. All code examples are AI generated but it places the attribution on the text that surrounds it.