51 pointsby crossroadsguy3 hours ago13 comments
  • reticulatesan hour ago
    I continue to be baffled by this sale. Letterboxd was acquired by Tiny 3 years ago, Tiny’s entire premise is that they hold for the long term. Selling after 3 years is not long term. I don’t understand why Tiny would undermine their raison d’etre unless it’s because the founders (who retain a minority stake) are pushing for it.

    Tiny just recently updated their website to emphasize how long they’ve owned each property which is especially confusing given they’re now offloading things https://tiny.com/companies/letterboxd

    “Tiny's model — long-term ownership, founder autonomy, no pressure to flip the company in three to five years — fit naturally.”

    …?

    • Grombobulous25 minutes ago
      I imagine that in life and business there’s no such thing as a decision that is never regrettable. I guess it just didn’t work out.
    • OzzyB42 minutes ago
      so you _believed_ them -- that is the only takeaway from this.
  • rdmuser2 hours ago
    Having such a high profile film rating site be potentially owned by a film studio has serious conflict of interest issues. Same goes for amazon buying imdb and they've already used that to adjust scores for at least one film they released because of bad reviews. I'm happy to see this get some attention here after my submission didn't because the potential implications of this purchase are big.

    Edit: I believe I made an error re the claim imdb changed the score of at least one amazon owned film. See replies for more info. Apologies!

    • aucisson_masque41 minutes ago
      > Same goes for amazon buying imdb and they've already used that to adjust scores for at least one film they released

      Any source on that ? I found nothing serious, just reddit and Facebook post. No one serious is reporting on it.

      • rdmuser13 minutes ago
        Ah actually unfortunately I think I made a mistake there so I apologize for that. Should have double checked instead of speaking from memory. I believe I was thinking of The Little Mermaid change but it seems like that wasn't their film. Sorry!

        https://www.avclub.com/the-little-mermaid-imdb-changes-ratin...

      • 25 minutes ago
        undefined
      • madeofpalk17 minutes ago
        The problem with Amazon owning IMDB, or A24 potentially owning Letterboxd, is not that they would screw with it, but that every move they make will be put through that lease. Even with NYT being the owners I’m sure there would be the regular ‘drama’ of whatever woke/anti-woke influence they may have over it.
  • clayhacks2 hours ago
    Is there an ATproto or activity pub version of letterboxd? I like A24, but not sure how much I trust Sony or the NYT to run it reasonably
    • zoenolanan hour ago
    • rurbanan hour ago
      A24 is the biggest cheater on Letterboxd, buying 5 star raters en masse. Warner is not much better. Sony is ok.
      • madeofpalkan hour ago
        What 5 start ratings have they purchased?
  • DarkNova62 hours ago
    Amazing. So Imdb 2.0 has become Imdb 2.0.
  • Computer02 hours ago
    I use https://movielens.org/ and it is ran by the University of Minnesota.
    • PyWoody41 minutes ago
      This looks almost too good to be true! Thank you for sharing. I'm going to migrate my 600+ library over tonight.
  • kkotak40 minutes ago
    Why not $3B? or $30B, even?
  • dgellowan hour ago
    Damn, that asking price is insane
  • 535188B17C937432 hours ago
    Can't wait for the enshittification of Letterboxd.

    Dear God, don't let Amazon do what it did to Goodreads here.

  • hotsaladan hour ago
    Heh, the name makes it sound like a daemon.

    service letterboxd enable; service letterboxd start

  • mpalmer2 hours ago
    Truly, everything good gets milked dry for someone's exit. I know that's usually celebrated in a forum like this, but is it possible things are just a bit out of balance?
  • thrownaway561an hour ago
    so glad I move over to TMDB the other day. Letterboxd layout is the worst.
  • ChrisArchitectan hour ago
    Referenced NYT piece (unlocked): https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/24/business/media/letterboxd...

    Related background on the state of growth there from a few months ago:

    The Rise and (Potential) Fall of Letterboxd

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48463894

  • sajithdilshanan hour ago
    If it's bought by A24 or Sony that's absolutely gonna be a conflict on interest and I cannot imagine the platform would ever be impartial for the reviews of their movies. It NYT buys it, then it would be turned into a woke nonsense project. I guess all good things must come to an end.
    • nimihan hour ago
      part of the charm of letterboxd is that its median reviewer is far more woke than every NYT contributor combined, imo.