15 pointsby harry_nutsachs8 hours ago1 comment
  • hersko7 hours ago
    [flagged]
    • krunck7 hours ago
      And then bulldoze flat an entire property including previously existing structures because someone wanted a greenhouse so they could feed their family.

      And who defines "illegal" in the West Bank? Certainly not Israel, because the West Bank IS NOT part of Israel. The West Bank is a sovereign territory of Palestine.

      Incrementalist colonialism.

    • bjoli7 hours ago
      For some definition of illegal. These things have a tendency to mean one thing for most people and another thing for the IDF.
      • hersko7 hours ago
        You can argue either way about the demolitions, but thats not why the article is on HN. It's trying to play off the nefarious and scary, "Weaponises AI" when in reality this is something that could have been automated a decade ago.
    • Matl7 hours ago
      > they're using it to scan for illegal construction

      It's nice that an occupying army gets to decide what's illegal, am sure.

      • hersko7 hours ago
        I guess? Seems pretty standard.
        • Matl4 hours ago
          Yeah, it's pretty standard for an occupation. I wouldn't call occupation standard.