34 pointsby Flimman hour ago14 comments
  • wahern2 minutes ago
    > the first VPN that can’t log your activity and outsmarts internet censorship.

    I guess they never heard of Zero Knowledge Systems: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_Knowledge_Systems

  • maxlohan hour ago
    I don't understand the point of this.

    Many (if not all) of the benefits on the landing page are available in Mullvad too, which is a more mature and reputable product, has all clients fully open-source, and powers the exit servers for Obscura.

    Why should I choose this over Mullvad?

  • john_strinlaian hour ago
    i am very skeptical of most vpn companies, and while i haven't looked too hard at obscura, it is worth noting the official partnership with mullvad (https://mullvad.net/en/blog/mullvad-partnered-with-obscura-v...) which is certainly a positive signal

    side note: i really wish more companies did the no email + randomized account number flow. there is a certain popular "pro-privacy" product beloved by many here that requires an email address and refuses to offer a similar account number method, which has turned me off the product.

    • mulmen26 minutes ago
      > there is a certain popular "pro-privacy" product beloved by many here

      Please don’t speak in riddles. Just say what you mean.

      • john_strinlai15 minutes ago
        for what purpose? there is nothing to be gained from pointing fingers, and takes the discussion in an even more unrelated direction.

        although i guess people's curiosity is also dragging my comment in an unrelated direction anyways. lose-lose situation.

        my main point is that the account number method is really nice, and a great selling point for such privacy-conscious products. not offering it in a privacy-conscious product is enough signal that it has made me choose not to purchase the product. that's the important bit, and where i was hoping to drive the conversation.

        • PunchyHamster6 minutes ago
          Incorrect. Pointing out bad products is a warning to other people to not waste time on it. We should be doing it more, not less.

          I also have no idea what company/service you're talking about

        • mulmen9 minutes ago
          [delayed]
    • baal80spam20 minutes ago
      privacy <> anonymity

      Proton VPN ensures privacy.

      • water-drummer16 minutes ago
        Privacy without anonymity is just privacy with a backdoor waiting to be unlocked.
      • john_strinlai18 minutes ago
        i am not talking about proton.
    • ignoramous26 minutes ago
      > ... a certain popular "pro-privacy" product beloved by many here ...

      If you're talking about Proton VPN, they do support "credential-less accounts" through their official apps, I believe? At least, on Android since 2024: https://www.androidpolice.com/proton-vpn-works-without-accou...

      • john_strinlai18 minutes ago
        i am hesitant to really narrow it down, but it is not proton (i am a very early proton customer)
        • mulmen17 minutes ago
          Then why comment at all? This is the danger of speaking in riddles.
  • barathr15 minutes ago
    As others have pointed out, this is like Apple iCloud Private Relay, and other multi-hop privacy systems that have been built on and off over the last several decades (Tor included).

    We wrote a research paper on the general principle a few years ago: https://conferences.sigcomm.org/hotnets/2022/papers/hotnets2...

    • dongcarl9 minutes ago
      Good to see you here Barath :-)

      I didn't realize Chris Wood was also an author!

  • skaul31 minutes ago
    So two hops, basically. First hop sees your IP address but not the website you're going to, second hop sees website but not IP address. Similar to Private Relay: https://support.apple.com/en-us/102602.
    • dongcarl10 minutes ago
      Yup, exactly!
    • mulmen21 minutes ago
      But if both services keep logs de-anonymization is a join.
      • PunchyHamster5 minutes ago
        They don't even need to. If you observe enough of them you can correlate traffic patterns between them and find out which one is used by which endpoint
  • ChocolateGod32 minutes ago
    Your traffic is still unencrypted by the VPN provider at the other end of the Wireguard connection, I am not sure how this changes that?
  • osnxkwmxkwndan hour ago
    This sounds pretty neat, and I do dig the website, though I can’t help but think it’s an odd combination to have bitmap/pixelated fonts and graphics inside perfect squircles.

    Seems like you guys have two distinct ideas of a visual identity completely at odds there. Shape contrast is nice and can be rather fun to play with, but it has to be handled with care. Right now it feels like the designer had a bunch of ideas and didn’t know how to bring them together in a cohesive identity.

    Bonus point for the TRON reference at the end! “I fight for the users!”

  • hehdtyjjoj37 minutes ago
    How does this prove Obscura and Mullvad can't just both gather tracking data and then just combine it on demand?
    • woah36 minutes ago
      and how is it better than just connecting to mullvad over nordvpn or something?
      • iAMkenough18 minutes ago
        If you're already a Tailscale user, seems like this solution is nearly identical to using Mullvad as an exit node.

        You would go with this solution if you don't trust Tailscale or NordVPN, I guess.

  • ramblurr33 minutes ago
    So like OHTTP but for UDP traffic? I suppose they are using MASQUE CONNECT-UDP?

    They are careful to not exactly claim the same anonymity properties of Tor, though I think a lay reader will read that differently (ie, that they do have the same anonymity property as Tor).

    That said being able to verify the inner wireguard conn to mullvad is nice. Of course you have to trust them that they aren't colluding with mullvad to share your identity/ip. But same goes for OHTTP.

  • dorongrinstein44 minutes ago
    I love the website, messaging and idea. Well done. if you guys need a place to host, please consider controlplane.com
  • chews5 minutes ago
    a vpn company is a paid for MITM attack surface.
  • iAMkenoughan hour ago
    Basically a middle-man for a Mullvad VPN, where if Mullvad decides to pull out of their agreement with this company, you lose your connection and are hopefully refunded.

    The single point of failure for this product is Mullvad and its leadership's changing opinions.

    • dgellow41 minutes ago
      Obscura itself is also a point of failure
  • nalekberov35 minutes ago
    I don't like 'us vs others' kinda comparisons, it's just marketing trick, which means they care more about sales than your privacy.

    Secondly, Mullvad did what Obscura does now years ago.

    Furthermore who needs a gamified VPN tool?

  • mkrdnk44 minutes ago
    > first

    Really? XD