7 pointsby mikelgan4 hours ago5 comments
  • stanfordkid39 minutes ago
    There is no reason for us to even be fighting in this war, or in the middle east. I don't know how Israel managed to convince Trump this was a good idea. Let's never forget Netanyahu was a big part of the lobby for Bush to invade Iraq.
  • mikelgan4 hours ago
    The changes include refining processes for vetting targets and adding open-source data feeds to better track civilian movement.
  • ck23 hours ago
    They already had a process that could have prevented the murder of hundreds of children

    It was a human review group for chosen targets

    They got rid of them, on purpose

    That's negligent homicide

    btw you'll notice that billion dollars per day of bombing for months now has also changed absolutely nothing

    just like decimating Iraq changed nothing, Afghanistan war changed nothing, Vietnam war changed nothing, Korean war changed nothing

    each time a President would never learn, only double down in cost and lives

    it's almost like war changes nothing, just kills a whole lot of innocent people

    unless that's actually the point

    which would be a war crime

    the pause in the war now is only because they need to develop a billion dollar bunker-buster for pickaxe mountain and then it's back to accidentally killing civilians by negligence again

    meanwhile we are starving Cubans to death via illegal blockage for no reason, only the cruelty is their point

    if the Dems do not get the Senate, imagine this country by 2029

    • SlightlyLeftPad2 hours ago
      All completely true statements; How long do you think before this comment gets flagged?
    • asdigonio16 minutes ago
      >That's negligent homicide

      Trump has repeatedly threatened Iranian civilians. He has repeatedly said he will attack civilian infrastructure and has made genocidal comments—"a whole civilization dies tonight", as I recall.

      Accepting "collateral damage" and using automated systems that are known to identify bogus targets is guaranteed to kill civilians. The fact that the killing is random and the ostensible objective is legitimate does not change the outcome. If the actual goal were to kill civilians, that could be accomplished with deliberately sloppy airstrikes on deliberately uncertain targets, with negligence serving as a smokescreen. You could assuredly carry out a campaign of genocide or terror using overly aggressive airstrikes on uncertain targets.

      The actual outcomes of these airstrikes align with our president's stated goals. I don't necessarily believe this is coincidence.

  • metalman2 hours ago
    Now that the US military is fully integrated with the ZGF( zionist genocide force) they can just atribute anything 'difficult' to them and say they know nothing for certain.
  • remusrm4 hours ago
    [dead]