81 pointsby davepl6 hours ago16 comments
  • kjs35 hours ago
    Please do not treat it as a challenge box; I can restore from tape, but that ruins it for everyone else.

    Unfortunately, for a disturbing percentage of the Internet, ruining things for everyone else is the goal. I'd turn off telnet.

  • dwedge4 hours ago
    A PDP-11 serving adverts for an AI-written site in 2026 was not on my bingo card. Imagine being brought back from the dead for that.
    • nancyminusone4 hours ago
      Unfortunately, this is just Dave "I wrote Task Manager" Plummer's handwriting.
      • ok1234563 hours ago
        Dave "fake antivirus software scammer" Plummer

        https://www.atg.wa.gov/news/news-releases/attorney-general-s...

        • kev0092 hours ago
          Wow. I can't imagine the thought process of going from accumulating a decade of Microsoft shares and experience during a pivotal era and deciding to plow it into a consumer scam op.
          • b00ty4breakfastan hour ago
            for some reason, the tech industry attracts these types like flies to...well, you know the saying. They aren't the majority of folks drawn to tech but outside of maybe finance, it seems to be their preferred habitat.

            it's their raison d'être to Always Be Conning

  • hartjer25 minutes ago
    Has to be cached, no? Its snappy
  • b00ty4breakfastan hour ago
    this appears to just be an ad for some webpage widget-maker.
  • mikerg875 hours ago
    I posted this to twostopbits. Community over there is small but devoted to such willful acts of restoration

    https://twostopbits.com/item?id=9970

  • sph3 hours ago
    What in the AI slop is this website? Looks like it's trying to get me to download malware.
    • dboreham3 hours ago
      Dave Plummer definitely isn't AI.
      • dallen333 hours ago
        He isn't, but nearly everything he puts out there is AI produced. His video thumbnails look awful, and that task manager he built for macOS is fully AI coded. Not saying it's a bad thing, but I dunno it's kinda all ugly looking to me.
  • jmbwell5 hours ago
    I love it. My PDP-11 has some fault that keeps it blowing fuses. Emulators don’t feel the same. Real hardware doing the work, well done
  • varjag3 hours ago
    Fantastic build.

    Do you know by any chance a source for Q-Bus edge sockets?

  • wrs3 hours ago
    What is the giant blinkenlight panel on the right?
  • frumplestlatz5 hours ago
    Thanks for keeping the spirit of the old internet alive :)

    I hope you won’t have to restore it from tape!

  • hinkley3 hours ago
    How about a nice game of chess?
  • budman15 hours ago
    as of 12 noon CST, it pings but does not telnet.
  • 5 hours ago
    undefined
  • 6 hours ago
    undefined
  • mlmonkey5 hours ago
    Why is the domain `pdp1173.com` when the machine is a PDP 11/83 ?
    • ktm5j5 hours ago
      There's a couple eyebrow raising things about this post.. like the fact that there's nothing but vague details in text and one photo with an AI prompt like alt-text. I think they're just trying to get clicks for that banner ad.
      • roryirvine4 hours ago
        Sadly, the site does seem AI-flavoured to a rather off-putting extent.

        And, as you say, the details are so vague - it's exactly what you might expect if an LLM wrote them based on reading a spec sheet rather than any practical experience.

        In particular, connecting that DEQNA to a modern network must have been a huge challenge all in itself and I'd have expected there to be a series of blog posts about just that. Maybe it's legit (and I'd love more detail if it is), but right now the presentation screams "thinly disguised ad".

        • spijdar4 hours ago
          I think he has actually posted videos of the restoration before (they've popped up in my youtube feed in the past), but I've never watched them, so dunno. The LLM site design and advertisement front-and-center are certainly a... choice....

          But, more importantly, why do you reckon DEQNA would be hard to connect to a modern network? NetBSD still supports it when running on a q-bus VAX: https://github.com/NetBSD/src/blob/trunk/sys/dev/qbus/if_qe....

          It has some pretty broken behavior regarding multicast/broadcast traffic IIRC, but nothing putting it behind a vlan or separate LAN altogether wouldn't solve. I've got a little lsi-11 system under my bed I'm hoping to, one day, get the Fuzzball [0] distribution running on. The 22-bit address extension wirewrap the previous owner did needs to be redone entirely, so it's been a "later" project for years now, but I am hoping my little DEQNA will be able to ping the Internet still.

          [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuzzball_router

          • roryirvine4 hours ago
            I was assuming that something of that vintage would only have been able to handle a 10BASE5 transceiver, but a wee bit of googling suggests that an UTP transceiver works well enough.

            Needs a patched ROM and recompiled kernel, though! See http://www.cosam.org/computers/dec/pdp11-23/20080402.html (and the two subsequent installments)

            (That cosam.org site is more what I'd be expecting for a project like this, but maybe I'm just too old and grumpy for my own good!)

        • dboreham3 hours ago
          Dave posts frequently about his work, some on YouTube and some on Facebook. You have to be in the right groups on FB.
          • ktm5j23 minutes ago
            You and several other people here are making unsubstantiated claims about how you're super sure this is real in a way that makes it seem less real. You guys seem to know this Dave character and are doing him a solid, right?
            • dcminter10 minutes ago
              Dave Plummer's a well known YouTuber. He pops up in a couple of DEC groups that I'm in on Facebook. However I'm not a fan. He seems to take a lot and contribute only self-promotional videos.

              The photo on this page looks very AI heavy. I'm not an expert but I really don't think those light panels are real (if they're real they're not contemporary to the machines they're in).

      • cube005 hours ago
        While probably it's legit because I've seen Dave discussing the process on the YT channel (which I no longer watch) he unfortunately does have form https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39813625

        Having TMOG on a .org when it sells commercial licences doesn't sit well with me given the history.

        • roryirvine4 hours ago
          Oh, yeah - this popped up on HN yesterday too and also met with scepticism: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49772362

          Oh well, so this PDP restoration probably isn't real. Disappointing.

          • dboreham3 hours ago
            What's not real about it?
        • ktm5j4 hours ago
          I'm a little confused by your comment.. especially considering the fact that you edited it and changed the link from and old comment thread from 2024 to whatever this dead post is from 2012. What does having form mean? Who is Dave?
          • cube004 hours ago
            Sorry, lost the last digit, fixed now. This restored PDP-11/83 project is Dave Plummer's
  • corbinvachal6 hours ago
    [dead]