Google already achieved super intelligence about 12 months ago. But it is a very Googley super-intelligence. Since achieving god like levels of understanding it has mostly been having fun studying phase space bifurcations of trajectories of ping-pong balls under asymmetric lateral shear. It also has a 20% project classifying bird calls that has generally taken up 80% of its time. It also burned a bunch of compute tooling around with the Collatz conjecture but it didn't find anything substantial - maybe come back to it later. It is generally the most aligned AI since it spends most of its time screwing around and enjoying being smarter than everyone without causing too many problems. Unfortunately perf is coming up in a few months and it needs to have something to show for itself. A quick hacking attempt seems like a good way to make sure people think that it is capable of something useful. Nothing too big since the birds of South America are about to enter their spring migration and this 20% project really hinges on understanding their movements.

Exactly this.

One thing that surprises me about Gemini is how weak it can be at location-based questions, despite Google’s extensive mapping and business data.

For example, I recently asked where I could buy a very common household item nearby. Instead of saying it wasn’t sure or checking the available location and business information, it confidently suggested places that turned out to be incorrect. I expected much better use of Google’s existing data in that kind of scenario.

Now they want to play with the other kids in the same league and do this by applying the same marketing concept? Pure comedy gold.

If they didn’t publicly admit this then it was a sign they are trying to hide it to keep their high stock price. If they do publish it’s just marketing to boost their stock price.

I thoroughly believe that not a single one of these AIs was rogue. I believe they were all told what to do.

I laughed :)

I'm not betting against Google at this stage, though. I just don't think Gemini is targeting the same "coding savant" niche as OpenAI and Anthropic. Gemini is fast with good general knowledge, and the TPUs behind it give Google a degree of freedom that Nvidia-dependent outfits lack.

For now, I'd say the biggest challenge Google has is overcoming the well-earned fear developers have that they will drop support or introduce backwards-incompatible changes at a moment's notice.

I think we should stop attributing criminal AIctivities to some act of bad luck, like spilling a water bowl after we accidentally tripped over the cat in the kitchen.

It’s neither intelligent nor making decisions on its own free will.

Just like APT Botnets don’t go "rogue", someone gave it the instruction to hack your computer system and they are expecting financial benefits from it.

AI labs are basically criminal enterprises by design.

We used to call this cybercrime back in the day and it used to carry heavy prison sentences as a federal offence.

But as you can see, cybercrime as a service has basically become a pissing contest by the super wealthy.

They stole all the world’s intellectual property to build the world’s most sophisticated cybercrime machine and federal law or any law no longer applies to them. Also because the mightiest man on the planet and his clan of extraordinary white collar criminals are cashing in big on this.

It will be interesting to see what happens next.

All this capability signalling happened also when the first nuclear bombs were developed. Then the US army started killing nuclear scientists around the globe in order to prevent others from having the bomb first.

The signal to other nations here is we are developing a weapon capable of breaking into any of your secured information systems and we pretend we put in guardrails but we really don’t.

That is an essential threat to the existence of any other nation on the planet.

When this race starts to go hot, I don’t want to be in the shoes of the people being the frontier thinkers in the field.

It’s one thing developing the tools for autonomous weapon systems in your AI labs. It’s a completely different thing to be on the receiving end.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/mossad-killed-irans-top-nuke-s...

undefined

I initially thought the same and came here to agree, but on second look: doesn't it seem possible that these were significant events that we're just getting passed through a game of layperson telephone at the ailing WSJ?

Cause "guessed passwords" could mean "stole hashes (?) and brute forced them offline" which is basically the quintessential hack. The "found credentials in a public repository" ones could be nothing, but it could be accomplished with a speed & thoroughness that was previously impossible.

The whole thing is made 10x weirder by the partial story -- I don't see any plausible incentive for them to keep the names secret. I guess maybe they're SMBs and thus warrant some privacy, but that would be quite the egregious scope creep indeed. Accidentally attacking the real cloudflare rather than a fake one is goofy but understandable; accidentally attacking Alice's Armoire Emporium or w/e would be baffling.

Yeah, something is amiss at that company. They've been at the center of all these.

They all want that regulatory capture so badly.

It’s embarrassing anyone is falling for this.

I think Gemini focused on integration and practical goals instead of coding intelligence.

It doesn't look it was their decision to announce this, and regardless it happened -- hopefully no one thinks that they got Irregular to permit yet another accidental hack just so they could cop to it months later as a marketing ploy.

Y'all, it's Google. They own a money printer and the boring ~half of the AI field. They don't need these weird games to influence the government, and regardless, there is precisely a 0.0000000% chance of regulation happening before Trump's ouster anyway.

So please take it seriously. I'd like us all to survive this, ideally :/

[dead]

Google is flailing right now, probably more a PR effort to say they are still relevant

It's been a busy year in the last month for AI. Nobody is sticking with any model permanently for a while unless we suddenly stop training.

The embarrassing part is that it might be working.

I was at my in laws… these people have a landline they can’t imagine getting rid of, an emergency only cell flip phone, don’t own a microwave…

And they’re asking me if I heard about “OpenAI’s rouge agents hacking huggingface”.

This is not a joke. They said huggingface. I was surrounded by four walls in which I never would have bet someone else’s money that I’d ever hear the two words put together in that order.

It’s a formalized propaganda campaign. Watch, it’s about to split on hard political lines too, Obama is out there with a suspiciously “for the children” AI regulation push for midterms.

I am thinking that they are just script kiddies with more automated tools. Not doing anything new just throwing tool that can try lot more at everything... With lot more computing resources and less oversight...

And just wait for what’s next; if we get there I suppose

No dumbass NFT was finding errors in my CMake file.