197 pointsby mkurz3 hours ago9 comments
  • moomin2 hours ago
    C# dev here: it’s amazing how different this is from a Microsoft release. First off, Oracle are doing versions at approximately twice the cadence. But also, and I’m guessing this is a function of the much larger Java audience: things rarely get two preview versions in a proper release. Updates in beta versions, yes, all the time. It also feels like Microsoft are bundling a lot more into the platform and leaving less to the community. Again, probably an artifact of the different sizes of the communities. Also, the page reads like an open source “We’re finished, we’re tired.” announcement rather than the razzmatazz of a Microsoft release.
    • kllrnohj2 hours ago
      > First off, Oracle are doing versions at approximately twice the cadence

      Is that actually a good thing?

      But Oracle started playing a game, for better or worse, where they decided to couple the "language version" with a single specific runtime's release schedule. For example, in "Java 27" there are exactly 0 language changes and 1 minor feature addition to the TLS library.

      Everything else is OpenJDK runtime internals which don't impact the language or how you use it. So if you don't use OpenJDK (such as if you use Oracle's other runtime, GraalVM), then Java 27 basically doesn't even exist at all. Skimming the past couple of C# releases, it doesn't look like Microsoft is playing that game, so the release cadence will of course be different.

      • pronan hour ago
        The Java language and runtime have been co-designed as a unified platform for many years now. Virtually every significant feature has language, library, and VM people working on it, and we often don't even know when we start how much of the feature would be in the language, library, or VM. Consequently, there is no "language version" or a "runtime version". There's only a platform version, which is defined in a single spec approved by the JCP (https://openjdk.org/projects/jdk/27/spec/). This also makes things easier with regards to compatibility and evolution.
        • kllrnohj17 minutes ago
          > There's only a platform version,

          And of the 4 non-preview JSRs in the Java 27 release, only 1 of them is actually part of the "platform version".

          The other 3 are strictly changes to Hotspot internals with no platform involvement at all. They did not change any aspect of any Java platform in any way whatsoever. That is what I'm referring to. I'm not referring to the fact that the core library, language syntax, and runtime specs are all part of the same version. I'm referring to the fact that Hotspot specific behaviors and adjustments are also branded as being part of the platform release.

          Like there's no Java 27 platform spec that says that G1 is the default garbage collector. That would of course be an absurd platform spec change. But that is still somehow a "feature" of the Java 27 release according to Oracle.

      • hyperpape2 hours ago
        You’re only counting JEPs, which are only for more involved features. There are lots of changes to the JDK apis that are used by other runtimes. See, for instance: https://javaalmanac.io/jdk/27/apidiff/26/.

        Admittedly, the terminology here is almost designed to be maximally confusing, and I’ve never read a good post that laid out how everything relates.

        • kllrnohj2 hours ago
          Fair, although even there I don't know if I'd call that "lots" at just 23 added or modified methods that aren't in preview
          • hyperpapean hour ago
            There are also bug-fixes and performance improvements that are not going to show on the page I linked.

            I do think it’s plausible this is a smaller release. Not that this was the real point of the discussion, but I think it’s still just a good idea to have more than one release a year. It keeps things moving smoothly, and lowers the cost of missing a release, which has beneficial effects.

            • flakes14 minutes ago
              I started programming when Java 6 was relatively new. Back then it was about 3-4 years in between releases. Although I don’t write much Java any more, I’m happy to see changes shipping more frequently now.
      • cogman102 hours ago
        There's not really a second C# runtime. Java has several, some based on the Openjdk, but a few that are completely new like OpenJ9 and Graal.

        The closest C# has is mono.

        This sort of thing is bound to happen with that situation. Heck, it happens with C++ whenever a new C++ version comes out. Some C++11 features took years to make their way into all the compilers.

        • vlovich1232 hours ago
          Graal is based on OpenJDK. OpenJ9 while using a separate JVM and JIT leverage the openjdk class path as well as the build environment and various other things.

          I don’t think there’s a single alternate implementation that doesn’t leverage a good chunk of openjdk somehow

        • 2 hours ago
          undefined
      • saghman hour ago
        I didn't read the parent comment as being particularly positive in their description; it didn't sound like it was being stated as a good thing to me.
    • petilon2 hours ago
      > Microsoft are bundling a lot more into the platform and leaving less to the community.

      This is a good thing. In Java everything has multiple community offerings, so before doing anything you have to evaluate the community offerings and decide which one to go with. If you go with the wrong one you may end up having to switch at some point, and that can be painful. This happens so often that most of the time spent when using Java is doing these evaluations and comparisons. With C# you just use the one built into .NET platform. Saves a ton of time.

      • PaulHoulean hour ago
        Sometimes the thing built into the .NET platform is great, sometime it is just crap but developers will use it anyway and it sets back the ecosystem.

        There is this division of labor between systems programmers and application programmers and often we think systems programmers are better because they know more about algorithms and data structures and compilers and assembly language and such. On the other hand, application developers understand how to reconcile the mental model of managers and employees and customers with computers, reality and common sense and, once they get experienced, see the commonalities between all the run-of-the-mill bizapps that we are coding all the time.

        Application programmers do a lot better at applications framework than systems programmers and make things like Ruby on Rails and Spring. Systems programmers make terrible things like ASP.NET MVC (I worked out a way to do MVC with ordinary ASP.NET, why couldn't they, with access to the platform internals?)

      • throwaway910332 hours ago
        If someone wants to create a project by assembling bits and pieces from different open source products they can, but many just go for Spring (Boot) and call it a day.

        All of my projects are based on Spring and I don't really have to look outside of that ecosystem. It almost acts as an aggregator of different open source solutions and often works by abstracting the functionality so that differences are not that big. I recently switched messaging providers and didn't have to change much of my code.

        • rwyinusean hour ago
          Yep, with Spring Boot development is so easy, and even decade old projects are mostly easy to upgrade. I don't have experience from C# or .NET development, but at least compared to Python and especially JS ecosystems it's so much better.
          • whizzter27 minutes ago
            Generally fairly painless in recent years, you need to divide the .NET timeline into original timeline ( .NET 1.0 -> Framework 4.8 ) and "core" lineage/timeline.

            The Core (smaller, but also properly crossplatform) project begun in 2014, fairly major rewrites with breaking changes in the new releases up until 2019 (.NET Core 3.1) and 2020 (the 5.0 release that became the official major "unification" with most parts of Framework having newer alternatives and being "complete" even if 6.0 and 7.0 patched holes).

            Projects started with core 3.0/3.1 in 2019 have a pretty easy and clear upgrade path without major breaking changes up until today.

            It's not JS/Node volatility, and the cleanups in the language/runtime were well worth it in hindsight (still maintaining old 4.8 applications running under IIS), also 4.8 is still nominally supported so there's no immediate stress in upgrading (There are better semantics today, but with huge projects those semantic differences, mainly no lazy-loading by default are a risk).

          • hirvi74an hour ago
            > Python and especially JS ecosystems it's so much better.

            That's a pretty low bar to beat.

    • theandrewbailey2 hours ago
      I never thought of Java being the 'move fast ~and break things~' alternative over .NET, but Java has a faster release schedule to get features out sooner.
      • madduci2 hours ago
        Seriously, how many are using always the latest releases of Java instead the LTS ones? With LTS ones you have ~2/3 years between the versions.
        • throwaway91033an hour ago
          We often use the latest version of Java at my work place. We haven't had any issues with upgrading, so there's no benefit of waiting for an LTS. There's no big process behind it either. The developers just quietly change the version as part of keeping the project up to date (BAU)

          It may be that we are shielded from edge cases because we are based on Spring, which is probably the most tested piece of software before new versions of Java are released. But it's my impression that the risk of upgrading to a new version of Java is not the same today as it was in the past. The only advantage of an LTS is that it is supported longer, so that you can postpone the upgrade if you really want. It's not as if the intermediate releases are inferior or less safe.

    • Phelinofist2 hours ago
      > Also, the page reads like an open source “We’re finished, we’re tired.”

      I mean it's short and concise and there are additional resources that provide more detail. IMHO it's not a bad thing.

    • hirvi74an hour ago
      I kind of wish C# would slowdown releases in some areas. I have not been a huge fan of some of the changes in the past year. I love the performance changes and bits of functionality here and there, but the syntax-sugar is getting annoying.
      • tancop21 minutes ago
        Most new syntax features make code more readable. For those that don't there are company style guides and `AGENTS.md`. The C++ philosophy comes down to "if it works ship it" and I don't think you're expected to use every single new feature.
      • whizzter24 minutes ago
        People complain, but most of the actually used changes are in things that continually used where I find painpoints.

        Not 100% on board with the collection expression changes (I found fluent Linq chains usually more readable), but they're improving painpoints so I think it'll work out in the end hopefully.

      • kittoesan hour ago
        Interesting take, how is optional functionality annoying? Isn't the fact that it's just sugar a huge benefit? Us old timers can simply stick to what we're familiar with.
        • fourseventyan hour ago
          Because unless you are the only person maintaining your codebase other people in your organization will start using the cool new syntax sugar and optional functionality. So you will be forced to deal with it as it starts showing up in your codebase.
        • pjc50an hour ago
          I don't get this either. You can even lock the language level if you really don't want it, or you can just ignore it.
      • ygraan hour ago
        You don't really have to use the latest C# version, though. Install the latest .NET and you get the performance improvements without usually having to change anything about your code.
    • 32oqa9an hour ago
      It's a normal open source announcement without the corporate bullshit. No fatigue. No doom. Just facts! /s
    • BatchJob2 hours ago
      razzmatazz? Do you mean marketing lies and self aggrandizement for merely doing shoddy work?
      • jayd162 hours ago
        Mads Torgersen's previews and such are enjoyable and upbeat, for example.
    • Betelbuddy2 hours ago
      >> Oracle are doing versions at approximately twice the cadence.

      This has nothing to do with Oracle. All good that you hear from Java in the last few years, is the great community and good old people from Sun working at Oracle.

      • GrumpyGoblin34 minutes ago
        Someone doesn't know their Java history. Oracle bought Java 16 years ago in 2010. At that time Sun had been working on Java 7 for over 4 years with no release date in sight. Oracle trimmed the fat and released Java 7 in less than a year. And since then has kept a regular release cadence. Sun would probably still be working on Java 7.
      • grodriguez1002 hours ago
        “The good old people from Sun working at Oracle” is now Oracle as well.
  • pineappletooth_2 minutes ago
    Still pretty fun that here banks are still using Java 8, where i work they use java 17 and you can still find work requirements asking for java 7 (mostly in goverment entities)
  • Horffupolde2 hours ago
    Serious question: when should one use Java for greenfield projects in 2026?
    • pronan hour ago
      These days, Java is mostly used in greenfield software that has to be very reliable, very performant, and last for many years. So it's often the first choice for banking, telecom, finance, government, defence, manufacturing control, logistics and shipping, media streaming, retail, hospitality, healthcare etc.. It's usually not a first pick for more exciting software, such as Python type checkers, JS bundlers, or TUI file managers.
      • throwaway91033an hour ago
        I think of Java/Kotlin and Spring as a secret weapon for startups. My workplace was a startup 5 years ago and it's amazing how things just worked as expected, leaving us more time to focus on the product. We have tried a few alternatives over the years, such as a few services in Rust, but the people who implemented those have usually seen the advantage of using a stable ecosystem after a few years. It's unfortunately something you need to experience yourself instead of being told by someone else.
      • astrodustan hour ago
        Why not Go, Rust, or C#?
        • pronan hour ago
          They lack in performance, stability (compatibility), observability (telemetry), productivity, or some combination thereof. They are chosen, of course (especially C#; Go and Rust are far behind), but not as much as Java.
          • brabel31 minutes ago
            I think you have a biased view. The number of stuff written in Rust in the last couple of years has absolutely exploded. For example, I see a lot of projects now that provide SDKs in Rust but don’t bother with Java. And I say this as someone who still writes most of my code ( or tell my LLM to write) in Java.
            • pron19 minutes ago
              There's a difference between number of programs and number of LOC (the latter is related to the number of people involved). I am not aware of any SDK targeting the industries I mentioned that "doesn't bother with Java". It's not only a popular choice in those industries, it's not only among the top choices, but it's the top choice by a large margin. Look at wanted ads in those industries to see that. Overall, there are only two languages as popular as Java or more, and they are JS and Python: https://www.devjobsscanner.com/blog/top-8-most-demanded-prog...
            • Mawr10 minutes ago
              Yeah I mean he literally works on Java at Oracle, so may just be a little biased.

              Doesn't bother to disclose it of course, because what, you don't check everyone's profile in every discussion to make sure they're not biased? What, you don't just know who every user on this site works for? You dummy you :)

              • pron7 minutes ago
                It's disclosed right there in my profile. Of course, I, like other runtime and compiler people, joined the Java team because we wanted to work on the most advanced compiler and runtime tech. I perfectly understand people who want to work on smaller, newer, potentially insurgent products, but I took the chance to work on the cutting edge of compiler and runtime engineering, and Java is where it's at these days.
          • misiek0815 minutes ago
            Saying that Go lacks in those is just showing how people are making software those days. It’s just terrifying.

            As to Rust - we all, hopefully, agree that it’s great language, but not for some startup making websites or Mongo based, boring backends. It’s great for the stable, system level products.

            • pron10 minutes ago
              I don't know what compiler and GC quality has to do with how people are making software these days, and I don't think state-of-the-art optimising compilers and GCs are terrifying at all. Go opts for more traditional, simpler algorithms under the assumption that for many purposes they're good enough. That may be so, but sometimes workloads really are very demanding.
          • akkad3320 minutes ago
            I don't agree. If anything these newer languages have better tooling and new projects are always built from ground up to support open standards like open telemetry
            • pron13 minutes ago
              Open telemetry is about how telemetry data is reported, not how it's collected. It's hard to compete with JFR on the breadth and depth of low-overhead, in production telemetry, built into the standard library and the JVM itself.
        • Almondsetatan hour ago
          Go and Rust have much worse tooling for enterprise-level collaboration
          • doublepg23an hour ago
            Do they?

            It felt like every dev that worked on our Java behemoth at a previous job was elated to switch to Go.

            • akkad332 minutes ago
              I don't think they do. I work in a maven shop and half of the people don't even know what to do when maven fails inexplicably
    • marginalia_nu2 hours ago
      Not at all a bad choice.

      It's stable to the point of boring, and there's no shortage of people who know the language and can work with it, it's got best in class tooling, decades worth of libraries almost all very mature. Most of the language's issues are from legacy code bases coded in a style that isn't really relevant to a greenfield project.

      • gentlewateran hour ago
        It’s still missing null safety, right? Which means it’s still a hard no for me.
        • msgilligan38 minutes ago
          The ecosystem has (at long last) standardized on JSpecify (https://jspecify.dev) for nullability annotations. JSpecify allows you to annotate a package or module with `@NullMarked` and your IDE and build (via ErrorProne+NullAway, typically) will check for null safety.

          If you develop a library in Java and use it from Kotlin, the built-in Kotlin null-safety will recognize the JSpecify annotations on the library.

          Null-restricted types are on the roadmap. See: https://openjdk.org/jeps/8303099

        • winridan hour ago
          I have a couple 50k+ loc java projects written entirely by LLMs at this point that have never thrown an NPE.
          • what_hnan hour ago
            Same here with go, then Again go doesn't throw!
            • xdavidliu16 minutes ago
              surely 'throw a npe' means something very similar to something that Go does
        • ivan_gammel35 minutes ago
          It is really not a big deal nowadays, the problem of the same scale as having index out of bounds error (no language has good defence against this, yet it is not a catastrophe).
          • pmontra10 minutes ago
            That's expected (the index out of bound). You have an array, and maybe it grows, you read a number from input, you don't check it against the size of the array because you want to torture the language, use it to get the element at that index and... I'm sure that there is a surprisingly number of different designs of what it should happen and a number of designed ways to ensure that it doesn't happen. But a runtime error is expected.
        • LelouBilan hour ago
          You can either use Kotlin then, or simply use java and nullability annotations, they have good support in both IDEs and analysis tools
          • gentlewateran hour ago
            I use Kotlin as my main language and I’m very satisfied with it.
        • marginalia_nuan hour ago
          Have you tried not returning null or constructing incomplete objects?
          • mrkeen25 minutes ago
            The standard library writers can go first.
          • gentlewateran hour ago
            Can I trust code I’ve written myself with no guarantees from the language? Maybe. Can I trust code written by dozens of other developers (and/or agents) working on the same project over multiple years? Definitely not.
            • marginalia_nuan hour ago
              Why don't you have any coding standards? If you're working with agents in particular, catching and enforcing this stuff should be easier than ever.
              • saghman hour ago
                Most engineers do not have the ability to impose rules by fiat on all of their coworkers. It seems like you're misunderstanding the nature of working on a codebase as an IC when other developers contribute to it. If all of my coworkers don't want a lint rule I propose, I don't get to add it. If all of my other coworkers want to write code in a certain way and approve each other's MRs with code written in that way, I don't get to veto it.
                • ndriscollan hour ago
                  Most engineers don't get to decide to use a language either. Usually someone with the clout to pick a language has the clout to set style requirements too.
            • gjadi34 minutes ago
              Null Analysis can be checked and enforced by the CI.
          • saghman hour ago
            Do you never use external libraries?
            • what_hnan hour ago
              With agents, we're getting there.
              • saghman hour ago
                I admit I haven't worked in Java for years, but no project I've seen at my current company (the only one I've worked at since agents have been a useful thing) is anywhere close to removing all dependencies. From what I've seen, people want to spend tokens on new things, not things that are already known to exist. Even if you can reinvent the wheel, it's not something that an employer is going to be particularly happy to subsidize.
        • wavemode38 minutes ago
          Nullability annotations + tooling makes this a non-issue in practice.
          • misiek0819 minutes ago
            I’m not sure how long it will take, but please - can we stop saying that annotations like @IHopeThisWontBeNull is a toy for kids and, having so many years of incidents caused by those and having LLMs to write and fix the code, we can rely on language and compiler already?
            • wavemode4 minutes ago
              You're drawing a distinction that doesn't matter in practice. If you encounter a NullPointerException incident then you either didn't annotate your code or you didn't run the tooling.

              I get that some people feel like it ought to be built-in to the language rather than a separate tool... but people's personal feelings are irrelevant to the lived experience of my day-to-day work, where NPEs are truly a thing of the past.

        • well_ackshuallyan hour ago
          Any serious project will be using NullAway and annotating everything (or, indeed, using Kotlin).

          Otherwise, yeah, you're still in for a world of pain.

    • t0mas882 hours ago
      When building boring web applications with a sizeable team that need to run for a long time. Hiring developers is easy since there are many, there is nearly no magic and the language is quite strict and type safe so it works well with a large team.

      And that "team" nowadays may also consist of many AI agents. In my experience Claude Code for example works very well with a typed, slightly boring language with lots of framework and library support. Because it doesn't compile when you get something wrong, instead of getting a vague runtime issue that Claude can't always see.

      • pmontraa minute ago
        It works well enough with plain Ruby and plain Javascript. It ported a Rails 7, Vue 2, vuetify 2, vuex app to Rails 8 (ok, easy, I did it myself at least once), Vue 3, Vuetify 4, Pinia. I had to visually check the SPA, of course.
      • BoppreH2 hours ago
        > there is nearly no magic

        I agree with the rest, but there's definitely a lot of magic in Java. This is from both what features the languages makes available (many) and how the community uses them (often). I've had so many hard-to-debug issues in Java over the years due to reflection, annotations, and bytecode manipulation shenanigans.

        And another positive point for Java: checked exceptions. It's verbose, but knowing exactly in which ways a function can fail is extremely helpful for building robust applications.

        • kccqzyan hour ago
          A lot of that is coding style. I’ve also seen a lot of hard-to-debug issues in Python caused by reflection, weird decorators that muck around with name-mangled symbols, and bytecode manipulation. You can even manipulate the traceback object so it’s more difficult to make sense of why the exception comes from.

          It took me quite a long time to accept that the recommended unit testing library manipulates bytecode so that the exception message for `assert a == b` prints the values for both.

        • msluyter2 hours ago
          I haven't really been in the java space for a while now, but I recall there being a fair bit of criticism[1][2] of checked exceptions over the years.

          [1] https://www.javacodegeeks.com/2026/01/javas-checked-exceptio...

          [2] https://reflectoring.io/do-not-use-checked-exceptions/

          WRT magic, I've generally thought that was a result of frameworks - Spring, for example. In the past, my feeling was that these impose a sort of meta/configuration language that itself is not checkable at compile time, so you'd get weird runtime errors that are somewhat inexplicable. This was like... 2018 though, so perhaps things have improved.

          • voidfuncan hour ago
            Checked exceptions are controversial mostly because a lot of the core APIs use them in places where it's pointless to check, like IOException.

            Using them correctly can be great tho.

            • dmux36 minutes ago
              >in places where it's pointless to check, like IOException

              Can you explain why this is pointless? In my mind, this being a checked exception would hopefully be a hint that I should think about this failure-case and make an explicit decision whether to handle it or not. Network connection failed? Maybe I retry. Maybe I store that data somewhere else as a fall back. Isn't this similar to Go programmers needing to check if err is not nil?

              • mrkeen18 minutes ago
                I don't think I can recall a time where I routed-around-the-damage on the basis of a particular typed exception.

                As soon as you consider retrying a network failure, you immediately need to start thinking about distributed systems failures, idempotency, and all that good stuff.

                As soon as you start thinking about the above, it becomes immediately obvious that low-level calls should not be able to decide to re-run themselves.

            • PaulHoulean hour ago
              Mostly I think they are a mistake, like in ordinary application code instead of catching close to the throw you want to do a lot of

                try {
                   ...
                } finally() {
                   ...
                }
              
              to make sure things get torn down that have to be torn down and let the exception go to the top of the unit of work and probably to whatever drives the work unit. You can probably do better than logging the raw exception and moving on to the next work unit but you can do much worse. That is, you want a default "sloppy" error handling approach that's correct that you can do without thinking and avoid other kinds of "sloppy" coding encouraged by checked exception such as catching exceptions locally without doing the right thing globally.

              Occasionally though I have built something really sensitive, like an authentication filter for a web site which has at least 5 ways to log in and in that I have a hierarchy of exceptions and use checked exceptions heavily to document all the ways things can go wrong and felt like "the type system really has my back here" but that is like 5% of the Java I write.

            • ndriscollan hour ago
              Scala's ZIO also demonstrates that they're a great idea and can be perfectly ergonomic, but you need type inference, which Java devs were resistant to for a long time (maybe still are? I remember lots of "how will I ever know what `val a = new Animal()` is???"). If you infer the exception type, they're basically invisible except for when you forget to have some place in your program to handle them, which is exactly what you want.
          • BoppreHan hour ago
            I'd argue that checked exceptions are still worth it, even though all the problems pointed out do exist. And that's because it works to inform consumers of what a producer is doing. Haskell has the IO and Maybe monads; Java communicates the same information through IOException and other domain exceptions.

            Many times I've decided to switch from one function to another, or even an entirely new library, because the checked exceptions told me that it was doing far more than I expected, and I was not comfortable introducing those new failure modes.

            It's far from perfect, one still has to handle nulls and wrapped/merged exceptions, but overall I like this language feature.

        • cavoiroman hour ago
          I agree, to name a few:

          - Annotation processing: if you know Lombok, MapStruct.

          - Class loader.

          - Reflection.

          - Garbage collection.

        • theandrewbaileyan hour ago
          > but knowing exactly in which ways a function can fail is extremely helpful for building robust applications

          I've worked on Java apps that have failed in mysterious ways that no exception could explain. Meanwhile, the overhead of having to call out certain exceptions but not others in language syntax is a bit excessive.

          For example, decoding a byte array (or URL encoded form field) into a UTF-8 string means handling a theoretical UnsupportedEncodingException. What the fuck? How the hell can one have a JVM that doesn't support UTF-8? Why does my code need boilerplate that will never run because there might be some broken-ass JVM out there that that doesn't support UTF-8? How did it launch a web server, safely load all the libraries, and accept a web request, and route it to my code without blowing up? "But the encoding scheme might change..." No, it won't change. It's always going to be UTF-8. It will always be UTF-8. If it's not, let it blow up.

          • Horffupoldean hour ago
            Perhaps you are the trip you expected to blow up first.
    • rwyinusean hour ago
      Java & Spring is a good choice whenever you want your application to work and be maintainable 10 years from now, without having to replace the framework and half of the libraries you used. I see few good reasons to ever use something with unstable ecosystem (like Javascript with NodeJS) over Java these days.
      • ulimnan hour ago
        Not just the time, but the environment, the OS as well. Where you can run JVM, there's a pretty good chance you can run your app.
      • jjicean hour ago
        Stability is a good point, although I am curious where JS and Node stand there now. They're not at the level of Java or .NET by any means, but the JS ecosystem has definitely begun to slowdown over the last few years. I've used express for the server and winston for logging for years and years now and they've very stable at this point.

        I guess I'm asking this as an open question: Where are we in the "move fast vs stable" spectrum with Node these days? Definitely not rock solid, but it's moving in that direction I feel.

    • dorkypunk2 hours ago
      When you are already familiar with it or work in a Java shop, there are better options if you are starting from scratch, but if you already have 50 guys that know Java it's a pretty big ask for all of them to switch.
      • doublepg23an hour ago
        Why not Kotlin?
        • dorkypunk41 minutes ago
          Most organizations that use Java tend to be pretty conservative with their technology picks and nowadays with newer Java versions the only real gap with Kotlin is null-safety which is supposed to also come to Java at some point. There is also an organization culture component most of the time, one our engineers actually proposed to use Kotlin for one of the new projects but it got rejected because "We are a Java shop"
        • mikert8917 minutes ago
          I think Java took all the best features of kotlin
    • skeletal882 hours ago
      Same question for .net or C#

      Why should anyone use it over Java? Ms is hostile towards its developers, it creates new versions of things, deprecates previous versions, uses confusing naming for newer versions.. etc.

      • bitgeistan hour ago
        Microsoft has come a long way since Satya Nadella took over in early 2014. The open-sourcing of .NET Core that same year was a huge step forward. Seeing a 'Microsoft Loves Linux' slide that year was something I did not have on my bingo card. VS Code and the GitHub acquisition demonstrated Microsoft's interest in fostering good relations with developers instead of alienating them. I do wish GitHub had stayed independent, though.

        Microsoft is a business and will always put their business objectives first. In my opinion, they have a non-zero amount of evilness. I do not support them jamming Copilot into every available crevice. I still think they make dumb choices, like every imperfect organization. However, C# is a powerful and intuitive language, and for Microsoft shops that already run a lot of Windows and SQL Server it makes a lot of sense.

        No shade to the JVM. I've mostly enjoyed my time in that space. I do believe the choice between Java and Kotlin, the wide variety of vendor JDK distributions and IDE fragmentation make the JVM stack a bit more difficult for newcomers to break into.

      • tester75632 minutes ago
        Consistent ecosystem with state of the art tooling (Visual Studio)

        Majority of things provided from MS instead of having to rely on 3rd party, especially nowadays when supply-chain issues are huge concern

      • hirvi74an hour ago
        Because your employer is dick-deep in Microsoft psychosis.

        I've been a .NET dev for a decade now. It's perfectly serviceable, but I wouldn't say I truly love the language anymore, but I would take it over Java any day. Entity Framework and LINQ are gifts from the Gods. I have never used an ORM that even comes remotely close.

        Also, C# is big in the gaming world. I am working on a game right now, and I was not impressed with what many other languages had to offer. It seems like the kings are still C(++) and C#. Of course, Java can create games, but I would argue that is a "could vs. should" kind of decision.

        Unity, Godot, Monogame, Raylib, XNA, FNA, etc. all can use or rely on C#. I have not seen Java be compatible with any of those -- except maybe Raylib? I do not know of anyone nor any games that use it though.

    • mikert8918 minutes ago
      When you’ll have tons of low skilled devs contributing to an important but boring application that will last a while
    • kllrnohj2 hours ago
      When you think a garbage collected language is a good fit for whatever you're building?
      • kfir2 hours ago
        Wouldn't you go with golang in that case?
        • ndriscoll2 hours ago
          Golang gives you none of nice features of a modern language while being about the same performance tier as Scala or Java, so there's basically no reason not to use Scala.
          • Thaxll2 hours ago
            Golang is faster and use way less memory than Java, never wonder why you never see Kubernetes controller / sidecar is Java?

            As for Scala it's pretty much a dead language, no one work with it and it's impossible to find dev for it.

            10 years ago I was moving Scala code back to regular Java.

            • ndriscollan hour ago
              Every job I've has has used different languages so I don't really understand the need to find a dev for a specific language. I went from network firmware in C to banking application servers in Scala and it took like 2 weeks to ramp up. Not a big deal. Now I write lower level networking stuff again in Go, which seems like its just worse than e.g. C-with-templates (and occasional classes) style C++ so I don't really understand why people like it.

              I think it used to be common to just look for smart people and assume they can run with whatever stack. Wasn't that the point of abstract algorithm questions etc. (basically an IQ test)?

            • weegoan hour ago
              It's sad - I spent a good 12 years writing Scala every day and it was the ideal language for my brain. Until it wasn't - sbt got too complex for it's own good, everything became "very smart" developers over-using implicit conversions, you couldn't find a project that wasn't an opinion war on cats vs whatever. It collapsed on the weight of it's own smugness.

              go and kotlin aren't it, gleam scratches the itch but I can't justify writing code that would impossible to hire for.

              scala situation is a real shame.

            • 2 hours ago
              undefined
          • eklavya2 hours ago
            I ported a moderate sized java project to golang. Test suite runs order of magnitude faster now. There isn't much change in terms of the architecture. Pretty much the same algos and data structures. The whole dev tooling runs on a 16 gb mac without swapping now. I used vs code for both
            • ndriscollan hour ago
              IME they're both in a place where Rust is maybe ~40% faster for a decent CRUD web application server, but with go you need to write much lower level code to get there (e.g. using composable generic iterators will ruin your allocations, so it's all manual for loops). You can write idiomatic high level Scala and get the same performance. Which could be as simple as the go compiler offers no ability to force inlining and has way too low of a complexity threshold, but that basically makes reusable code unusable in high performance situations.

              The whole go team's philosophy tends to also revolve around assuming their users don't know what they're doing, which is annoying. Like an inline keyword: thinking you know better than me doesn't mean I'm not going to inline it; it means I'm going to manually write it inline myself in the code, and then think the language sucks because it's tedious, error-prone, and verbose. Or they tend to mark lots of stuff private for no reason, and e.g. with TLS 1.3 they just ignore your config because they think they know better, etc.

        • pronan hour ago
          You could, but it's not as fast as Java, especially under heavy workloads, its telemetry is nowhere near as good, and it's much less popular.
        • topbanana2 hours ago
          I would, or C#
    • topbanana2 hours ago
      When you work at a Java shop. Kotlin is much nicer if you have to run on the JVM but aren't restricted to Java.
    • foolfoolz2 hours ago
      java is a great language for server side projects. it is actively maintained, the biggest issues with it have JEPs, and it’s very friendly to AI authors
    • nonethewiseran hour ago
      Here is a niche one:

      When you want to make a game and support modding with pretty much zero development effort.

    • pie_flavor39 minutes ago
      Java-the-language blows, but Kotlin does not, and Java-the-platform is on the Pareto frontier of oldest-yet-most-usable open-source ecosystems. I prefer Rust, and the gaps where it doesn't apply, C# fits my use cases better, but Kotlin/JVM is a rock solid development platform.
      • hobo12325 minutes ago
        I once tried Kotlin for a pet project, but after a while switched it back to Java, since it's good enough, IDE support is better, it's much faster.

        I guess if you use/like Intellij it's ok.

    • DanielHB28 minutes ago
      Java and C# seem to be the best ways of making code-first OpenAPI based servers.

      C# LINQ also seem to be the best compromise between ORM and raw SQL queries, although I never used it myself.

      I have been severely disappointed in all similar solutions for Go at least and I imagine Rust does not have something better given it has a smaller community-base.

      Python and NodeJS have some very neat solutions for this stuff too, but both are "slow" dynamic languages. I personally dislike python with a passion and NodeJS stuff is extremely community-driven and therefor often unreliable. Prisma (NodeJS ORM) for example just did a major overhaul and is now pushing a completely different API.

      If you are making boring REST API to SQL Database it seems like Java and C# are the best options.

    • eranationan hour ago
      I wrote about it 13 years ago, some of it still stands true. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5857495
    • pjc50an hour ago
      JavaFX is fairly high up for "I want to run the same UI on Mac and Windows, and I don't want it to be an Electron web app in a box".
      • whartung4 minutes ago
        JavaFX is a hidden gem. I really like the programming model with its binding and scene graph and CSS.

        It's not as portable as Swing, as it has some platform specific binary components to it. But it works fine on mainstream platforms. For me Swing portability is not worth giving up the FX model.

        Just be aware that if you happen to bundle in the Web view component, you're basically adding WebKit to your distribution. I did this with a small project because I wanted to have a "help" screen with Markdown -> HTML. Easy, but "expensive". It simply adds a big chunk (10-20Mb) to your distribution.

        (Now I have a very crude Markdown renderer for this task, which is a 100 lines code, and I'm working on a better one -- but I have yet to pull the trigger on the latest FX with its new Rich Text component, which could change everything.)

        One hot tip with cross platform FX, however. Embed your fonts. The font suite is not common across the distributions, and the CSS does not honor the font fall back (i.e. if not XXX font, then YYY font), so if the runtime doesn't have your specific font, it collapses to the System font. So, embedding the fonts you use helps a lot with cross platform stability. Plenty of free fonts, I have not had a real problem with this. But it can be one of those O.o moments when you test on other platforms and encounter it the first time.

    • orangesilk2 hours ago
      Jruby is nice - runs Ruby on a Java Virtual Machine with full concurrency and Ahead Of Time compilation
    • 2 hours ago
      undefined
    • soco2 hours ago
      Whoever works with, or chooses Java, is not doing it for the language itself, be it beautiful or not. Java has a huge ecosystem, from battle tested integrations to optimized images to build pipelines to whatever, so at the same you're buying access to all this world (yes, more than an environment). And of course transferable skills. I'm not saying Java is alone offering this, also not saying every feature is the best, but you can have them all, and even choose from different options.
      • marcosdumayan hour ago
        Java's ecosystem is lingering since Oracle brought the language, and it's at the point where you should really look if the things you want to use are still in the state of the art, or if they felt behind every other language.

        And if you are starting from scratch, whatever part of the ecosystem you use, I'm not optimist on its situation improving with time.

      • rzmmman hour ago
        I use Java for hobby projects, I think it's design choices make it a nice minimalist language for "classic OOP" style: dynamic dispatch, encapsulation etc.

        Nowadays a lot of code is written with mostly procedural style with some functional characteristics, I wouldn't use Java for that.

  • aaronax2 hours ago
    "The Java Story" documentary by CultRepo on YouTube is pretty great. A major topic is the release cadence which some other comments here are mentioning / joking about.
  • arein32 hours ago
    Project Valhalla will go into Java 28 (next year, and preview version).

    Fingers crossed I'll manage to use null type safety in my lifetime.

    • brabel19 minutes ago
      You really need to dare to try something else, Kotlin has been available for many years and the cost for a Java shop is super small since the same tools work with both. I’ve used also Dart which is lots of fun. Even Typescript can be a good alternative depending on what you’re doing. All have nullability guarantees and a nicer type system than Java while being in the same ballpark in terms of performance.
    • pregnenolone2 hours ago
      > Project Valhalla will go into Java 28

      Unfortunatley without specialized generics and without the performance benefits that are supposed to come with it. They were too slow with Valhalla.

    • rf152 hours ago
      universal null type safety has sadly been discarded as a core concept of Valhalla in my Understanding; that being said, the proposals in Valhalla have null-safety as a side effect, but only under certain conditions.
      • MrBuddyCasino2 hours ago
        When (if) null safety ships, I‘m not sure I can justify using Kotlin any longer.

        Java simply got too nice.

        • hn8726an hour ago
          Multiplatform and Compose come to mind as Kotlin differentiators. I agree rest of the language actually slowly falls behind
    • karussell2 hours ago
      A first step of Valhalla that is ...
    • 2 hours ago
      undefined
  • taspeotis2 hours ago
    Knock knock

    Who's there?

    long pause

    Java

    • Betelbuddy2 hours ago
      High Speed Trading team using Java looking puzzled ....

      https://lmax-exchange.github.io/disruptor/

      • Bluestein2 hours ago
        This thing is a-ma-zing. It is truly a wonder. It is something to behold. The "Disruptor" pattern.-
      • pohlan hour ago
        the long pause is the JVM starting up
      • 2 hours ago
        undefined
      • what_hnan hour ago
        Agentically convert to rust, get more trades faster
    • lazystone2 hours ago
      Oh, I see, jokes from 30 years ago!
      • HelloUsername2 hours ago
        The long pause between the knock and the answer took 30 years
      • Boereck2 hours ago
        Alternatively:

        Knock, knock

        who's there

        It's the 90s, wanting their jokes back

      • nairboon2 hours ago
        And still funny today, not all jokes survive that long.
    • hobo12321 minutes ago
      If I'm not mistaken, OpenJ9 runtime offers some kind of precompilation and fast startup.
    • winridan hour ago
      Don't put a 30gb heap on m4 boxes and you'll be okay
    • nsxwolf2 hours ago
      G1 is now the default garbage collector in 27.
      • taspeotis2 hours ago
        Sorry I only just set -xXx360NoScopexXx=4G to run that latest version without hitting OOM and you are right, it is indeed quite fast with G1.
        • paulddraper2 hours ago
          You misunderstand, xxx360NoScopexxx is now the default.
    • azatom2 hours ago
      It's on you bc it was (arguably but still) dead 17 years ago.

      edit: don't get me wrong, i am not here to hate java, but bc i am also ... hm necrophil :)

      • taspeotis2 hours ago
        17 years is a rookie number. Take C# auto-properties, for example: 19 years ago!

        Now try asking, "When did Java get auto-properties?"

        • azatom19 minutes ago
          I never cared about those kind of syntax sugars. I was happy with IDE/static checkers, lombok, mapstruct, etc.

          I missed generators like that virtual threading for example.

          btw: i was referring a single point when oracle bought sun and "closed java".

        • marginalia_nu2 hours ago
          News at 11.

          Language that runs on the explicit design philosophy of letting other languages experiment first and then incorporating their lessons learned once the dust has settled is late to implement a feature.

  • svcrunch3 hours ago
    I've been using the Vector APIs for years now, and I'm still waiting for them to GA!

    They are useful for neural information retrieval (RAG, memory), which relies heavily on content vectorization and similarity matching using their dot products.

  • rf152 hours ago
    > Twelfth Incubator

    Are you sure this egg is actually viable?

    I mean, I'd love to see it, but...

    • papercranean hour ago
      The JDK team made a decision awhile ago to hold the Vector API until value types are final. That's why the API has been incubating so long.
  • aitoolcruxan hour ago
    [flagged]