8 pointsby andsoitis2 hours ago4 comments
  • hacker_homie4 minutes ago
    My thought was to write legislation that gives 20% of my generated ad revenue to me the customer as legal tender (no store credit, coupons) then have the government tax that income.

    1. government gets new income source.

    2. government is invested in making sure they are not getting short changed.

    3. failure to pay me is fraud.

    4. When you pay me now I know your crap is spying.

    5. Government taxes almost never go down, with this system it going down will immediately be visible to consumers who will balk.

    Problems: ad revenue is the new shrink-flation without it prices will rise. companies will fight this tooth and nail, but voters get "free" money.

  • alphabeta3r562 hours ago
    Privacy is only hard because comoanies are not telling/asking tgeir customers before sharing their data.

    A way to solve this problem would be to create a portal where customer data is stored in control of the customer. Companies are only allowed to tell each other about customers, not even which data they hold.

    And then each data request goes directly through the customers.

    Then customers can decide who to share data with. And then those customers will be happy with their choices.

    • andsoitis2 hours ago
      > Privacy is only hard

      Privacy is one of those words that you think you understand until you try to define it.

  • 26 minutes ago
    undefined
  • spottedmarley2 hours ago
    Personal privacy is, and has always been, the job and responsibility of the individual. You can be as private or as public as you allow yourself to be through your own practices. Nobody can give you privacy, you must take it, which requires work and sacrifices that most people are simply unwilling to make, that's why nothing has changed. If it's privacy you want, stop being so public. Avoid surveillance. It's not easy but it's also not impossible, you have to actually value your privacy enough to do the work of establishing it. Good luck.
    • k31025 minutes ago
      > If it's privacy you want, stop being so public. Avoid surveillance. It's not easy but it's also not impossible, you have to actually value your privacy enough to do the work of establishing it

      I can't avoid traffic cams by any sane means (like taking side roads?) I MIGHT be able to do without the electric company and water company (which I do during outages) but I am not seeing how to avoid the DMV and USPS, which sell my data.

      Does a privacy seeker have to be a prepper? I certainly hope not.

      Surveillance capitalism and policing is so pervasive. And the connection is money. Especially with Citizens United, laws are bought to trash any right to, or even possibility of privacy.

      Not bashing your post, just pointing out the extreme difficulty.

    • mdspanan hour ago
      Yeah, and I think it's gotten much worse with LLMs. If someone wants to use an LLM privately, their two options are either redacting/morphing their data before sending it through or hosting locally, both of which are intractable for most users. And if someone chooses not to use an LLM they face a dramatic loss in productivity. I don't think the tradeoff between privacy and convenience has ever been this severe in history, with the exception of the smartphone.