GNU Radio in the browser(gnuradioworld.com)
73 pointsby kristianpaul2 hours ago5 comments
  • thomashabets22 hours ago
    Oh that's cool!

    I've set off time to blog about getting my broadband RF scanner (connecting to USRP B200 via WebUSB) to work in WASM.

    https://rf-survey.habets.se/

    It's basically https://blog.habets.se/2026/08/Broadband-RF-scanner-revisite..., but in the browser.

    I also have an AX.25 decoder (https://thomashabets.github.io/ruwasm/) and plain old FM receiver (https://cement.retrofitta.se/tmp/rtlsdr-fm/) already. The latter two work with RTL-SDR, also via WebUSB, so no software installs or setup required.

    I've been meaning to make a "GNU Radio in the Browser" (well, gnuradio-companion-like) for my RustRadio project to build flowgraphs without coding, but not gotten to it yet.

    • alightsoul35 minutes ago
      With wasm, I see a future where the browser and thus web technologies are a UI toolkit for a Linux desktop environment. It already is, people hardly use GTK and qt anymore except for desktop environments or embedded like on cars due to performance limitations. It would be cursed to see a browser running within a browser. But then replacing a desktop environment might be the limit of replacing GTK qt and other UI toolkits with web technologies, making it unnecessary and opposite to the reason people use Linux which is performance
      • thomashabets218 minutes ago
        I agree. Browser APIs don't have as much coverage as native APIs, but I would say that by far most UIs should be in the browser nowadays.

        Quake can run in the browser, so in my opinion so can the likes of Photoshop. Maybe the latest AAA game is a different beast, but that's a tiny edge case.

        Websites instead of apps on mobile is something that basically always sucks, but I don't see the same on desktop.

        Just build your UIs in WASM already. :-)

        > It would be cursed to see a browser running within a browser

        It's been done.

  • jcims2 hours ago
    I tinkered with gnuradio back when rtl-sdr just took off (2012ish?).

    I had no background in dsp or signal processing and found it so opaque as to be unusuable, even though I saw more skilled folks do amazing things with it.

    *scratches head*

    Might give it another go.

    • Enginerrrdan hour ago
      I have to say having just done a very tricky project with a long DSP pipeline in gnuradio, that LLMs are a godsend for getting up to speed on gnuradio blocks. I too found it historically impenetrable, but was able to get a pipeline completed. That said, prepare yourself for a lot of debugging and work to diagnose problems if you’re doing anything of sufficient complexity.
    • perrygeo2 hours ago
      I've tinkered with SDR some and did a bit professionally. I always found GNU Radio to fall into the uncanny valley - too GUI to scratch my programming itch but too low-level to be useful for exploration. Between libraries like `pyrtlsdr` and desktop apps like `sdrangel`, I can't seem to find a niche for GNU Radio.
      • keedaan hour ago
        I worked with GNU Radio quite a bit at one point a decade+ ago, even writing a custom C++ block, but I almost exclusively used it via Python rather than the GUI toolkit. I found it much quicker to mess around with flow graphs in code than their various UI frameworks, spawning windows as needed when plotting waveforms / spectra etc. The GUI as you said was too cumbersome.

        I understand that they were trying to make a pretty complicated topic more approachable, but I always felt the push to GUI was misguided. Maybe they would have had more luck embracing the “S” in “SDR” and making programming languages the primary development paradigm.

    • stackghost2 hours ago
      Run through pysdr[0], which I found has the right complexity gradient and the right levels of abstraction for people with technical chops but who aren’t familiar with SDR

      [0] https://www.pysdr.org/

  • miki_tyler23 minutes ago
    This is so cool! Congrats!
  • tamimioan hour ago
    That’s amazing, thanks for the share! I did a small test, it works, screen is a bit harder to navigate on small screens but not an issue.
  • gvierian hour ago
    Cool. On github forked and starred. Thank you.