19 pointsby thelastgallon6 hours ago4 comments
  • simonw5 hours ago
    This is a mislabeled upload of stolen content.

    The original video is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AuZoDsNmG_s - on the official Stanford Online YouTube account. It has the title "Stanford CS230 | Autumn 2025 | Lecture 9: Career Advice in AI" and was published 8 months ago.

    The linked video was uploaded 3 days ago with the misleading title "Prompting is dead in 6 months" and the following description:

    > During the lecture at Stanford, Andrew Ng gave a direct warning: Prompting will be dead in 6 months. Graphs are what's replacing it.

    > He breaks down why prompt engineering has hit a ceiling. Instead of tweaking long instruction blocks, developers are wiring models into execution graphs where agents fix their own errors and pass state through loops without manual intervention.

    That is a total misrepresentation of the talk. The word "graph" does not appear a single time in the transcript, and the talk is about career advice.

    • simonw5 hours ago
      I'm a little intrigued as to what is going on here. Searching for "Prompting is dead in 6 months" returned this video, the Hacker News thread, and a LinkedIn 15 minute extract from this video where the author claimed that it was about "prompting is dead" and then, when challenged in the comments, said that the 15 minute extract omitted that bit.

      So there's some kind of weird deception going on here but I'm not sure what the motive is or who started it.

      • Aurornis4 hours ago
        This is the current meta-game for AI videos on social media. Repost a recognizable AI figure talking about something and then write a description about how it contains more information than something more expensive (in this case, paid courses), and how what they're saying is revealing the future. Make the viewer feel like they need to watch to avoid being left behind.

        It even has the social media style subtitles where only a few words are on screen at a time and the current word is highlighted rapidly.

        I think this person is trying to farm views. May even have an AI bot set to spam this across social media platforms to try to monetize it.

      • tomveber2 hours ago
        Did that LinkedIn account cut the 15 minutes itself, or repost someone else's cut? Depends which one you are looking at, sloppy framing or a hook someone built on purpose.
    • mdp20215 hours ago
      The channel has 4 videos and the first one ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XdbpCM4yGyE ) is titled:

      # Andrej Karpathy Stanford Lecture: Delete Everything, Keep Graph

      It seems like the new channel has a bias?

      • polotics4 hours ago
        I wouldn't call this a bias. More likely an A/B tested find that (1) algorithmic YouTube video-surfacing with keyword "graph" plus AI related name-dropping was effective, and (2) the already well established journalistic trick of leading with fear to trigger loss-aversion, as "prompting is soon dead" implies some threat of skills-value loss for the reader.

        driving engagement to scrape the bottom of our ad-driven engagement dis-attention economy, tragedy of the commons pure.

        • mdp20214 hours ago
          Right. That, and what I wrote simultaneously nearby.

          Maybe the common point is "bad incentives".

          • polotics3 hours ago
            The one weird trick of reassigning all the income from that contents-stealing to the original posters would I think cover a lot of the realignment.
      • simonw5 hours ago
        > Andrej Karpathy and AI systems engineering into a single hour. His core thesis: "You can actually delete everything… Delete everything, keep Graph."

        Yeah, that's not what that video is about either. This is weird!

        • mdp20214 hours ago
          > weird!

          It's simply the "HR failure" plus the "unintended web" plus the "shamelessness pride" - where free expression is accessible to both poles in the vectors and the agents wear a blank mask, and the message is "self-expression" (postmodern performance "through the medium of posting") instead of debate.

  • orbital-decay5 hours ago
    The next logical step is to express execution graphs in a formalized language.
    • Revanche13675 hours ago
      What might we call such languages?
      • nhgiang5 hours ago
        Something to programme the AIs
      • globalnode5 hours ago
        lets call it A, then in 5 years A++
        • bot4034 hours ago
          The hardcore ai folks still assemble their instructions in prompts for best speed and control of the underlying model.
        • kermatt5 hours ago
          AI AII AIII AIV AV ...
  • stackghost5 hours ago
    Can anyone summarize? Not going to risk watching a 2 hour video.
  • tehsauce5 hours ago
    missing label 2025?