53 pointsby treve5 hours ago10 comments
  • oceansky3 hours ago
    The title undersells it.

    The TV has multiple mics that can't be disabled, they constantly record everything and upload transcripts in plain text.

    It gathers data and metadata of all devices on the network, including IP addresses. And even analyzes network data to understand which applications are being run.

  • mitxela2 hours ago
    It's good that at least one tech company still listens to its customers! Ba-dum-tss.
  • bspammer3 hours ago
    Obviously they'll get away with this in the US, but doesn't this break a LOT of EU privacy laws?
  • klipklop2 hours ago
    Only a matter of time before they ship with cell modems so you can’t disconnect them from the internet.

    My LG tv post-update is never allowed on a network and it will never be updated again. Hopefully it never breaks…

    • BLKNSLVRan hour ago
      I wonder whether it's better to connect it to a network that is then firewalled off from the internet. That may prevent it from looking for alternatives.

      > Only a matter of time before they ship with cell modems

      I do wonder about the hackability of this. Will it be a purely telemetry connection or will it be able to stream video via that connection as well? (not that data costs as much these days as it used to). Can we piggy back the rest of our internet data on this connection? LG TV as modem/router?

      Will they include GPS, so they can also connect your home address to the profile they're creating on you? Location-specific advertising value would make that answer: yes!

      • iamnothere27 minutes ago
        They would probably use a low cost IoT plan, which (without volume discount) is something like $1/mo and a few cents per MB. So they may be able to send content ID info or conversation transcripts, but video would be too expensive unless the user pays.

        GPS is probably unnecessary since mobile phones are constantly mapping out WLANs. You can get a decent approximation of GPS with just a wireless scan in most places.

        I saw a previous conversation here where someone said they were able to “repurpose” a similar IoT modem to get some free data, but the modern chips are soldered on and tightly integrated, so it would be harder to reuse unless you get root on the device. I think they use eSIMs stored in a secure element in the CPU.

    • satvikpendeman hour ago
      Other TVs like Samsung are using a peer to peer mesh network with nearby devices instead. LG might do the same.
    • Quibblingeek2 hours ago
      I do the same thing. My concern is that if somebody makes the decision to spin up an open wireless network it’ll just try to connect to that and upload all of the telemetry it’s been holding onto.

      I’m considering opening mine and taking a desoldering braid to both the RJ45 and wireless antenna solder joints. This might break the TV, but at this point if it does I’m ready to just throw it in the trash and find a commercial display.

      I bought a television. I didn’t buy an invitation to be watched in the name of surveillance capitalism and until America gets its shit together with data privacy and consumer protection laws this is just going to continue happening.

      I haven’t had a chance to watch this yet, but I did watch the preview and all of Steve’s latest work has been great so I’m sure it’ll be great.

  • BLKNSLVR3 hours ago
    This seems to be the worst case scenario, put into practice by a highly popular device manufacturer. Are they doing this with all of their other devices as well? Monitors, washing machines, fridges? If they can fit this into a TV, they can fit it into everything else.

    There's also a fair bit of arrogance from LG: "We own the glass..." leading to this great piece of marketing:

    "within an LG TV household we can help extend the ad campaign footprint to the other devices in the household" (at ~14:11)

    Advertising is a mind virus. These people are fucking gross. And this seems to be what all technology companies are turning into. Advertising is the Paperclip Maximiser of the real world.

    I recently divided much of my home network into VLANs (with "Entertainment" devices separated for this very reason), and this makes me happy to have done so, but now makes me want to do the same to my in-laws network, since they have an LG TV and I regularly connect various of my devices through their network...

    Tangential point: I recall on a previous article someone commenting on their surprise at how good Gamers Nexus investigative reporting was. This seems to be another example. You go Gamers Nexus. Might have to buy a supporter pack.

    • jw_cook3 hours ago
      > There's also a fair bit of arrogance from LG: "We own the glass..."

      The execs shown in those clips used some pretty revealing language. I also had to do a double-take when they described a customer's (compromised) house as an "LG household," where they "know who's in [it], we know which devices are there... we know how to extend that reach into mobile" and tell advertisers they can "own the living room."

      The sense of entitlement is so over-the-top that it's difficult to distinguish from satire.

      • BLKNSLVR2 hours ago
        I shared this thought with a friend of mine recently, primarily in regards to the use of residential proxies:

        They don't care about any effect on the individual people.

        They view their thing in a vacuum with some kind of religious fervor. It's a form of psychosis, and it seems increasingly prevalent in tech company leadership and so spreads into those who aspire to be tech company leadership types.

        • mitxela2 hours ago
          also, residential proxies don't really affect anyone except Cloudflare, who we should rightfully hate anyway. Spying does.
          • BLKNSLVRan hour ago
            Fairly strong disagree. Plenty of damage could be caused to the individual, whether they made the decision to run a residential proxy or not.

            Essentially little difference from running a tor exit node.

            My position is that I assume that most people running a residential proxy are not aware that they're running a residential proxy. I understand why people use them and how they're useful, but I just don't think there's informed consent. I think they essentially grew out of botnets, or botnets just rebranded into 'residential proxies'.

            Having said that, I'm not trying to convince you to change your position. Feel free to continue to disagree with me.

      • mitxela2 hours ago
        It's like AI model collapse, where they're surrounded by feedback they're doing everything right, no matter what, for a long time, the feedback loop just drifts away from baseline reality.
      • mitxela3 hours ago
        [dead]
  • hi_hi2 hours ago
  • avodonosov2 hours ago
    Telescreens.

    Can anyone recommend a non-spying TV brand or a model? (Modern)

    • iamnothere37 minutes ago
      Sceptre still makes some, Walmart carries many of their models.
    • BLKNSLVRan hour ago
      Possibly use a projector instead?
  • ChrisArchitect3 hours ago
    Related:

    LG TVs aren't the only ones spying on you [video]

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49575176

  • mitxela4 hours ago
    Extremely concerning!
  • jocelyner2 hours ago
    [dead]