5 pointsby xnx8 hours ago2 comments
  • jqpabc1238 hours ago
    This is really a make or break moment for Tesla.

    Regardless of any "investigation", the big change here is that Tesla is now solely responsible (and liable) for the safety of a "autonomous" driving system that still requires constant supervision.

    Cybercab comes with Starlink fully integrated. Attempting to remotely supervise a level 2 vehicle using using a satellite data link is eye popping to say the least.

    What could go wrong? Is Elon Musk really dumb (or maybe desperate) enough to attempt this?

    • flutas6 hours ago
      > Regardless of any "investigation", the big change here is that Tesla is now solely responsible (and liable) for the safety of a "autonomous" driving system that still requires constant supervision.

      They have been for the past year, they've had Model Ys running autonomously since June of last year (albeit with safety "passengers" at first).

      • jqpabc1233 hours ago
        They have been for the past year

        That's the storyline they want the public/investors to believe. What they have been telling the authorities is very different.

        Tesla filed new comments with the California Public Utilities Commission that amount to a quiet admission: its “Robotaxi” service still relies on both in-car human drivers and domestic remote operators to function.

        https://electrek.co/2026/02/19/tesla-admits-needs-drivers-an...

        • Arodex33 minutes ago
          People really need to watch the movie Sleep Dealer.