8 pointsby FinnLobsien7 hours ago2 comments
  • CrimsonCape4 hours ago
    I wonder if the John Sculley scenario has influenced this decision.

    My cynical side says that Boomer investorship would feel wrong about hiring anyone BUT an old-guard legacy aging alpha CEO type for this role; which would have been finding a modern John Sculley for the role. But maybe the past experience with Sculley has had a lasting impact.

    Instead, they kept the promotion in-house and pulled a younger guy from the ranks.

  • free_bip3 hours ago
    Now we can have John Apple instead of Tim Apple!