4 pointsby BrainQuanta3 hours ago3 comments
  • goatydev2 hours ago
    That seems like a fairly novel idea. I’m not sure if it uses AI or OCR to analyze the images, but the external recording of sensitive information—such as that found in PDFs—could raise privacy concerns. It will be important to address these concerns and reassure users.
    • BrainQuantaan hour ago
      Thanks! It uses Gemini, so it's definitely not on-device processing. I tried it, the quality is far away from what I needed. Thanks for your concerns! I'm already addressing some, but I agree, it's the most important part here.
  • Glitcher2553 hours ago
    How do you handle user's privacy? what servers are my private pictures being uploaded to to be scanned? how do you handle your server costs? I find the idea to be convenient but the last thing I want is an AI sorting my dick pics for me.
    • BrainQuanta12 minutes ago
      Fair question :) Well, first of all, only the photos you explicitly select go to the app. No permissions given for the whole gallery. So you can just avoid uploading dick pics to Keeplea :)

      What you (and only you) decide to upload, then goes to Cloud Storage and Gemini. So the only provider your photos are shared with is Google.

      But the honest part is that the data is not end-to-end encrypted. In transit and at rest, yes, but I run the project, so technically I can look. I don't and I have special machinery around my processes so that I never do this unintentionally, but that's still a promise. Do you think this would be a blocker for potential app users? What can I do if the on-device processing is not an option?

      About costs. It's subscriptions, nothing else. Free tier stops at 20 captures, Pro is $9.99/month (for US, different for other countries). Processing itself is very cheap (a small fraction of a cent per photo).

      Thanks!

  • DylanMerigaud3 hours ago
    Nice launch, good luck out there.