13 pointsby ColinWright18 hours ago2 comments
  • vzqx13 hours ago
  • hyperhello13 hours ago
    This doesn’t seem to have anything to do with solar panels exactly, just suggests that nature has optimized so it can thrive equally in sun or shade, which seems logical; otherwise one area would have such an advantage it would outcompete the other.
    • manvillej12 hours ago
      Grazing animal yields are directly related to the forage the animals can eat.

      Farmers are trying to optimize the number of bites and steps an animal takes to get full. Fewer bites and fewer steps means bigger animals.

      Which means farmers are generally focused on how good their grass is. This leads to a focus on soil health, rotational grazing, pushing out less productive plants, etc.

      The concern around grazing animals and solar is from whether solar will impact grass growth which will in turn impact the animals’ growth.

      Which it doesn’t.

      Shade can impact grass growth. Grass doesnt grow as effectively under heavy canopy. But it’s generally the fallen leaves that actually kill off grass.

      It seems that solar panels do not block enough light to have any impact on grass growth.

      • hyperhello12 hours ago
        Good, because my understanding that putting huge solar farms on acres of land is the most effective and harmless way to use solar is unchanged.