15 pointsby BinRoo3 hours ago2 comments
  • cube002 hours ago
    It would be worth clarifying the cost and your intentions with my email address.

    Considering the top level domain is trying to sell a book and you're active about your company on LinkedIn I'd be worried about my email address.

    • sajithdilshanan hour ago
      Then don’t put your email address. My gosh, it’s not like he can activate nukes with your email address
  • fxwinan hour ago
    > This course teaches the craft of building practical quantum circuits from scratch.

    Can't wait to have an ion trap in my living room!

    I would love to appreciate the work that is going into this curriculum, but when the lesson overview is overwhelming amounts of AI copy slop I just can't bring myself to be interested.

    Edit: i'm talking about the text, not the pictures. It's not overwhelming in the sense that it is a lot of text, but in the sense that the amount of Claude-isms in relation to both word count and actual content is way too high for me to care about. Take lesson 9 for example:

    9. Where the quantum lives

        every page is a classical drawing
    
        the animation is impossible
    
        each step has a classical model; they refuse to glue
    
        one story per step, no story overall
    
        where the quantum actually lives
    
        and the gap has a price, in coherent memory
    
    
    I have no idea what is going on here or what the topic of this lesson is, and the same is true for like half of the lesson overviews here. Like i said, i'd love to be able to judge the content, but there is none here.
    • debo_an hour ago
      In one minute, I learned they commissioned the art from an actual artist. Calling a few bullet points under each image "overwhelming" is strange. Perhaps get over yourself.