34 pointsby cwwc6 hours ago31 comments
  • curuinor6 hours ago
    Look. This is a new golden age of cocaine, because of the big cuts in everything in the US took away the cocaine busting operations in Colombia and Bolivia, because the revolutionaries that previously kept control of it stood down and became a political party and new, profit-driven cartels came up, and because battery technology means that narcosubs and similar drone things work much better than before (and they can be made remote-operated, so the cops can't do shit even when they find one). Wholesale prices have halved or gone down 60% to like, 12k usd / kilo, street prices commensurate. The huge new opportunities created by increased market size have increased competition and made the cartel nature of the cartels decrease. So always think of that when you look at people acting like this and having such megalomaniac goals.
    • randysalamian hour ago
      I don’t really like working with cokeheads. Megalomaniac goals but not the discipline or grasp on reality to achieve them. Always feel like it could be cool to be on a team of cokeheads (and be one) if everyone was truly cracked.
    • UltraSane5 hours ago
      It would be hilarious if the price of cocaine actually affected macroeconomics because of how it affects human behavior.
      • fhdkweig5 hours ago
        It actually might. It affected the mood of stockbrokers in the 1980s, both because of general energy levels and also because they were addicted and had to keep the money flowing. That must do something to macroeconomics.
      • twic3 hours ago
        Is there a dataset for this? Maybe a Bloomberg ticker?
    • interestpiqued5 hours ago
      Honestly you have a point. The decrease in cost of cocaine is very real
  • speedgoose6 hours ago
    I see myself over $3000T in potential revenues too. You shall see. Please invest.
  • tfrancisl6 hours ago
    $30T? Why not $100T? $1000T? Why not $1 trillion trillion? If we're just pulling numbers out of our asses we may as well go big.
    • karmakurtisaani5 hours ago
      1 trillion trillion you say?! Sounds ridiculous, but if they can even reach 1% of that target, they'll make a killing! Sign me up!
    • intrasight5 hours ago
      Echoes of Enron
    • burnt-resistor4 hours ago
      Can be achieved with low/no margin financialization of revenue between a web of companies.
    • ForHackernews6 hours ago
      "Our Neumann projections show us on track to achieve 15.3 heptillion dollars in annual revenue by the year 2030."
      • goatlover5 hours ago
        Data centering the universe is an improvement on paper clips I guess.
  • zerof1l2 hours ago
    The issue with models and Claude in general is that I don’t know anymore what model selection and thinking level are for. When first released, Opus 5 worked well; now it's crap. We have no control or visibility over what is really happening on the other end. You don’t know what is really running on the other end. Our incentives are misaligned: Anthropic gets paid per token - some abstract unit of measure that keeps changing all the time - while I pay for a problem to be solved. So it's Anthropic’s interest to waste as many tokens as possible, producing garbage cheaply.

    Opus 5 has been absolutely horrible last couple of days, writing essays of code and comments, fixing one thing, breaking another. Finally switched to GPT 5.6 Sol and Terra, and it's so much better. But I had a similar experience before switching to Opus 4.8, so how long will that last...

  • ViktorRay5 hours ago
    When all this crashes, future historians will look back and wonder how so many got hoodwinked by AI.

    Some of these future historians might even be reading this Hacker News thread.

    To any future historians reading this, many of us did know this AI stock bonanza was just a modern day tulip mania. Alas many wealthy people did get hoodwinked though.

  • yumraj2 hours ago
    According to Reuters which refers to this WSJ article [0], $30T is the TAM. Calling it potential revenue is a huge stretch.

    Not justifying as this number as it is stupidly large, but theoretically if AI replaced all White collar workers in the World it will come to around $30T or so (Gemini said it’s $36T-$37T based on some calculations using global GDP, labor share, white collar share etc)

    TAM is always stupidly large in decks, disconnected from reality. Every startup has a deck with TAM in billions.

    [0] https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/anthropic-exp...

  • horse-shot6 hours ago
    Is it realistic to expect every person on earth to pay them $3,500?
    • sandeepkd6 hours ago
      Of course, we just need to figure out how every person on earth would make at least $7,000 after they loose their job on the name of AI. (Assuming they need at least $3,500 for other basic needs).
      • sixtyj2 hours ago
        Babies included.
    • tkahnoski5 hours ago
      Agree with the absurdity. I also had to look at are there other absurd but real things. Estimating at 4.2 trillion in oil revenue is about $500 per person globally. Until you factor in the uneven distribution of that revenue what seems like an order of magnitude problem goes away.

      There are of course many other holes to poke in a high level estimate like this.

    • Brendinooo5 hours ago
      Stretch the timeline out enough and add enough inflation and anything is possible!
    • ryandvm4 hours ago
      I'm sure they can extract $3,500 worth of value from everyone's existence.
    • 5 hours ago
      undefined
    • greenavocado6 hours ago
      Their friends control the Central Banks and the printing will continue until $30T buys you a loaf of bread
      • christophilus6 hours ago
        Yeah. I see this estimate as either A) hot air (my serious take), or B) a dire warning of out of control inflation, or C) a prediction that they'll be a going concern in 500 years when $30T is in fact an average corporate revenue figure if the USD still exists by then.
    • goatlover5 hours ago
      Put 100% tariffs on everything and drive inflation and trade wars up.
    • jstummbillig6 hours ago
      a) No. That is not realistic. Some would pay much more, most others way less.

      b) If they get $3500 + x in return, why not? The pie is not fixed.

      • jazzpush26 hours ago
        I have completed stopped using Anthropic since Kimi 3 released, and only ever K3 and Codex nowadays. I pay for K3, and get Codex and Claude free from work. Almost everyone I know prefers Codex to Claude.
        • waffletower6 hours ago
          All my friends know that Sam Altman uses astroturf as carpeting in his office.
          • jazzpush22 hours ago
            You can review my post history to see I'm not astroturfing. I don't know what else to say except continue coping. Try searching 'opus 5' on twitter to see what a shit show that model is.
      • mawadev6 hours ago
        In fact, we should put an AI Tax on everything you buy, because AI was used somewhere to make it
    • onion2k6 hours ago
      The question isn't whether or not every person pays $3500, but whether or not businesses can extract more than $3500 of value from their interactions with you to make it worthwhile for them to pay.
  • 0cf8612b2e1e5 hours ago
    2025 revenue numbers:

      - Microsoft $281 billion
      - Apple $416 billion
      - Google $402 billion
    
    Seems likely that a company renting most of their hardware will generate multiples more cash than these established players
  • 01284a7e6 hours ago
    Before you dump it, you have to pump it...

    In other words, we are to see a media barrage leading up to the IPO to get retail investors to jump on the stock.

  • the__alchemist6 hours ago
    There is still no way to search or filter your list of projects in the Claude sidebar, or get it to show you the active ones.
    • pwython5 hours ago
      Sure there is. You've been able to search/sort/filter/group for a while now.
  • cdrnsf4 hours ago
    Ah, so it's not just their products that hallucinate.
  • daft_pinkan hour ago
    What will inflation have to be for us to reach that?
  • pluc6 hours ago
    The only obstacle is everyone using it for everything
  • seydor6 hours ago
    That is a typo. It is a Q not a T ! How could we have missed it
    • bitwize6 hours ago
      I'm sure Sam and Dario have a bottle of Cinco Comas sitting on that high shelf...
  • the__alchemist6 hours ago
    Puts once they IPO
  • AJRF6 hours ago
    What are they currently making?
  • ForHackernews6 hours ago
    Yep, 92% of estimated US GDP in 2026. That sounds totally plausible to me.
    • garciasn6 hours ago
      Or ~25% of the world's GDP.
    • goaliecaan hour ago
      In there is some delusion that LLMs will create hundreds of trillions in new wealth.
    • SiempreViernes6 hours ago
      It's just 25 % of world GDP bro, and only slightly more than double the projected worldwide construction market in 2028.
  • vesrah6 hours ago
    Over what period of time?
    • HarHarVeryFunny5 hours ago
      It's a Feynman path integral - integrated over all possible future trajectories of Anthropic, including those where they have a thriving business on Tatooine.
    • spwa45 hours ago
      I feel like I'm a comedian saying this, but of course per year.
  • TSiege5 hours ago
    The combined revenue of the SP500 ~$18.28T, or ~14.8% of global GDP in 2025 (~118.35T). So is anthropic really saying that they expect to have 1.64x the revenue of the SP500 or that the total addressable revenue for AI they suspect is $30T? That number is at least plausible but expect to earn 25% of global GDP is a bit whacky unless you've drunk a lot of koolaid
  • 5 hours ago
    undefined
  • misiti37806 hours ago
    They should focus on fixing claude code, as I just canceled my 200/month subscription for codex because it's quality has degraded so much.
    • GPerson5 hours ago
      They’re focused on curing all cancers in 5 years. Curing claude code is beneath them.
  • paulpauper6 hours ago
    I remember how 3 years ago the consensus, even here, was it was a fad or unsustainable.
    • lovich5 hours ago
      As far as I am aware, they have yet to make a single dollar in profit.

      At some point selling a dollar for 5 cents stops being a viable strategy.

      • fuzzfactor4 hours ago
        With how much money has changed hands or has been agreed to do so, aren't the people involved already rich beyond their wildest dreams?

        Isn't that one of the most lucrative financial things seen at this scale, and one of its primary characteristics is that it was accomplished without profits?

        Who wants to rock the boat anyway by introducing a truly unruly variable like that at this late date?

      • mysterydip5 hours ago
        Sure, the revenue per unit looks bad, but we’ll make it up in volume!
    • goatlover5 hours ago
      You think $30 trillion projected growth is sustainable?
    • bigstrat20036 hours ago
      It still is unsustainable.
  • glimshe5 hours ago
    That's awesome! I also predict that Leopold Aschenbrenner will be the world's first trillionaire under 30!

    PS: Not.

  • mmooss5 hours ago
    As you mock them, notice that they again emotionally provoked the public, using words that disrupt people's feeling of safety and stability and therefore which bypass their cognitive processes and hit directly in their emotions and alarm. That's the goal.

    The mocking is usually an attempt to get back some equilibrium, to regain leverage, to make the scary threat into something smaller.

    So it looks like their tactic worked yet again. Why is it a goal? One aim is to seize and hold the initiative, and also to make you compliant when they do further transgressive or dangerous things.

  • throwaway235975 hours ago
    Honestly though, if they legitimately achieve RSI, I feel like all bets are off and anything could happen.
  • IAmGraydonan hour ago
    I have a feeling a lot of people here read the headline, hit the paywall, and had a reaction. This is just the ridiculous estimate of TAM that every IPO contains, and it's always a complete clown show. Uber set their TAM at $6T in 2019. They currently do $50B per year in revenue. SpaceX set theirs at $28.5T on $18B of revenue. These numbers are not to be taken seriously at all. Each claim has to be more outrageous than the last because that, after all, is what they're selling in their IPO.

    https://archive.is/iJskQ

  • josefritzishere5 hours ago
    This is delusional. Are you ready for the biggest short ever?
  • rvz6 hours ago
    Now AI companies are playing with ridiculous Enron-level accounting tricks to justify their already inflated valuations?
    • hermitcrab6 hours ago
      How else are they going to get rich selling something for a tenth of what it costs them?
      • intrasight5 hours ago
        Enron did it for years and the senior managers became fabulously wealthy.
  • ofjcihen6 hours ago
    It’s heartening to see that most of HN is starting to call shenanigans on these ridiculous numbers.
  • theideaofcoffee5 hours ago
    So I'm guessing that's the same $billion passed around these companies 30,000 times, then, right? If we're just pulling numbers out of thin air, I think I want to make $6723 kajillion dollars this year, and if I don't, I'm going to whine!

    This shit is getting so fucking exhausting. No, you're not going to make $30 trillion. Ever. It's second-hand embarrassing how high these idiots are after huffing their own farts.

    I hope it crashes and burns -hard-, and the 'wealth' of these insipid billionaire sociopaths 'leading' these operations evaporates so they're just another crank on the street corner so they're easier to ignore.

  • 0x70run5 hours ago
    [dead]