16 pointsby gmays2 hours ago2 comments

ausbahan hour ago
i’m not trying to dismiss this article entirely as i did get value around from discussion around verifying
but this coming from a VC firm invested in token producing companies and quoting the “genius” behind openclaw makes me think this is just an psyop of over engineering to get ppl to blindly spend tokens on the LLM slot machine
- jdcaballerov33 minutes ago
  Not really; looping is a requirement when there's an imperfect generator: LLMs. I read the article some days ago and included the citation in my own.
  For a longer explanation why, here's mine:
  https://memseek.ai/blog/the-loop-has-always-been-there/
  ps: not affiliated with a16 or similar
- datadrivenangelan hour ago
  Put another token in the slop machine!
Sha1rholder41 minutes ago
I failed to think of any polite words to express my feelings about this article.
- esafak2 minutes ago
  I'll do it for you: it's bullshit written by someone who doesn't even code, quoting the guy whose ilk causes Github to crash every damn week.