4 pointsby venkat9718 hours ago6 comments
  • Planktonnean hour ago
    Generated prose is devoid of meaningful semantic content.

    The one takeaway I got from this article is that deepsql.ai are the last people I would trust to handle this problem, because they can't even explain it themselves.

  • duttish4 hours ago
    It seems they're conflating two different risks? Read-only connection is a solution to Integrity risk, while they straight away start talking about Confidentiality risk instead.

    They're also problematic, but different kinds of problematic and I don't see how this is different from managing employees database access.

    Then there's no mention of handling Availability risk management. An employee or agent querying the entire order table joined with... and the entire db cluster is choked for two hours.

    • venkat9713 hours ago
      Data confidentiality and sovereignty matter a lot to enterprises. You may want to redact access to the most sensitive data from both humans and agents, and it gets tricky to enforce such dynamic policies at the database level. DeepSQL solves this by managing all DB users (humans and agents) at the DeepSQL layer.

      DB availability is out of scope for DeepSQL at the moment.

    • rumisid3 hours ago
      [dead]
  • winstonwinston3 hours ago
    Blog post is displayed for a moment and shortly after the post text is replaced with a cryptic error about regex parsing. I guess it has something to do with Safari javascript engine. Anyway, the current state of web development is so pathetic.
  • Priya_17_5 hours ago
    [flagged]
  • Stack_overload5 hours ago
    [dead]