108 pointsby mariuz4 hours ago5 comments
  • mort962 hours ago
    Does anyone understand how HDMI 2.1 support is now no problem? I remember that 2.1 support in AMD's open source driver was blocked by the HDMI forum, but I haven't heard any news about them unblocking it. What changed?
    • lashkari2 hours ago
      It doesn't give any specifics about what changed on the HDMI Forum side, but this article [0] from June indicates that Valve worked closely with AMD to get it pushed through prior to the release of the Steam Machine (which supports HDMI 2.1 VRR).

      [0] https://www.digitalfoundry.net/news/2026/06/valves-hdmi-2-1-...

    • seanw4442 hours ago
      As far as I can recall: some internal implementation documentation leaked which made the legal position tougher for them somehow to protect it as proprietary (it made sense when I heard it explained, but now I feel like I'm missing an important detail to that), and then Valve had some talks with the HDMI Forum to convince them to let it go, presumably so they could have such support integrated into Linux for their hardware (Deck, Machine, Frame, etc).

      So now the HDMI Forum just doesn't really care anymore I guess.

      • gary_0an hour ago
        IIRC, a non-AMD contributor was working on adding HDMI 2.1 support to Linux's AMD driver, and then AMD managed to get the HDMI Forum to see that their position was moot and was making things very awkward for AMD.
        • mort96an hour ago
          Oh this makes sense! Obviously, it can't be illegal for a non-forum-member to add HDMI support; it's just an HDMI forum policy after all, not law. That's certainly the link I was missing for this to make sense.
    • dayofthedaleksan hour ago
      White collar crime is legal now so IP violation is a pretend concept.

      Update - Happily eating the downvotes on this one.

      • calgooan hour ago
        Only if an AI does it, so make sure the vibe code the driver
  • yipinwong2 hours ago
    Who is the main audience for this type of content? Genuinely curious because I am not a serious Linux user.

    What type of info do you get out of this for those who read this? So i can glance your insight?

    • sph2 hours ago
      It's a well-formatted changelog of the most salient features of the release. Linus doesn't provide one apart from a list of added commits and merged branches, which isn't very useful unless you are a kernel developer.
    • tuna742 hours ago
      I think it is mostly "marketing" for Igalia's services. If you want to pay people to do "stuff" in Linux and adjacent projects like Mesa, Igalia seems very competent.
    • igleria2 hours ago
      hi audience, we know about this stuff you use on a daily basis, you may be interested in our executive summary of the latest release of the stuff
    • gchamonlive2 hours ago
      I don't think there is much too it, it's a consulting firm. Would you hire a consulting firm with an empty tech blog portifolio? It's ticking a box, it's stating it's a consulting firm in tech, that it's target audience are companies with Linux machines etc...
      • yipinwong42 minutes ago
        ty. so very narrow audicence it seems.

        Per @sph, as Linus provide no changelog, seems like the firm is putting it together for others

    • Retr0id2 hours ago
      I for one am excited about HDMI 2.1 support on AMD.
      • seanw444an hour ago
        It's more than that: free and open support for HDMI 2.1 in general. Previously it was only proprietary implementations that didn't leak the spec which were allowed. AMD is just the only one that has really good open source drivers which can benefit from it, and didn't work around the problem by converting HDMI to DisplayPort in a proprietary on-board GPU chip.
      • yipinwong41 minutes ago
        OK, now this is what I wanted to know as well. I was not aware that changelogs show all this inf.

        ty for sharing

    • 2 hours ago
      undefined
  • OtomotOan hour ago
    Okay, so ELI 5 why I would now use HDMI instead of DP?

    All my monitors support DP, my GPU has more ports for DP ...

    I am genuinely interested as I've never even considered using HDMI for my Desktop.

    • drdexebtjlan hour ago
      If you’re using a TV. They rarely have DP ports.
    • ThatPlayeran hour ago
      HDMI 2.1 carries more bandwidth than DisplayPort 1.4. Plenty of GPU/monitors have that port arrangement, as recent as Nvidia's RTX 40 Series.
      • preisschildan hour ago
        Yeah but this is for amdgpu and they had DP2.1 support for a while now.
        • ThatPlayer37 minutes ago
          That doesn't help when the monitors don't have DP2.1 support.
          • preisschild24 minutes ago
            I havent seen a monitor (besides tvs) that has HDMI2.1 but not DP2.1
            • ThatPlayer20 minutes ago
              I can tell you mine does: a Corsair XENEON 27QHD240. Or the somewhat popular and badly named Acer Nitro XV275K P5biipruzx

              I'd say it's common for displays released 2-5 years old. HDMI 2.1 got somewhat quick monitor support for consoles, but search for "first DP2.1 monitor" gets results from 2024

            • MBCook16 minutes ago
              And that parenthetical is exactly why people care.

              TVs.

    • ulfbert_inc32 minutes ago
      HDMI is a king on consumer TVs. Linux (in form of SteamOS) is becoming a major console gaming platform thanks to Valve.
    • whalesaladan hour ago
      I have been using HDMI to game on TV for most or all of my adult life. Mostly console gaming. A few years back I built a dedicated gaming rig, but I still use it with a controller from my couch connected to a TV.

      So this is a win for couch gamers and open source in general.

  • hndbwksam72 hours ago
    Great context, thanks for adding it
    • pelcg8 minutes ago
      Sounds like an AI comment.
  • bigwheels29 minutes ago
    Why is DRM being implemented in the Kernel; What is the profile for an end-user who wants this in their FOSS?
    • telotortium23 minutes ago
      Here it doesn’t mean “digital rights management”, but “Direct Rendering Manager”, a component of the kernel’s graphics stack: https://docs.kernel.org/gpu/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
    • voxic1122 minutes ago
      People who want to play video games, or watch videos using hardware decoding, or train machine learning models? DRM here means https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_Rendering_Manager

      > DRM exposes an API that user-space programs can use to send commands and data to the GPU and perform operations such as configuring the mode setting of the display.

      > User-space programs can use the DRM API to command the GPU to do hardware-accelerated 3D rendering and video decoding, as well as GPGPU computing.

    • Shish2k22 minutes ago
      The Direct Rendering Manager is useful for any Linux user who wants to display things on a monitor (unless you're happy with like 640x480 VESA, in which case maybe you don't need it)
    • Lorkki23 minutes ago
      This is DRM as in Direct Rendering Manager, which is the kernel interface to GPU hardware; not Digital Rights Management.
      • cogman1022 minutes ago
        Named long before Digital Rights Management was a thing (or at least the 3 letter acronym existed for it).
    • lultimouomo23 minutes ago
      Different DRM, the one in the kernel is Direct Rendering Manager, which is basically managing access to the GPU.
    • 23 minutes ago
      undefined
    • 23 minutes ago
      undefined
    • sapphyrus17 minutes ago
      DRM refers to Direct Rendering Manager in this context.
    • dralley23 minutes ago
      DRM = Direct Rendering Manager. GPU scheduling.
    • proxycon20 minutes ago
      its the Direct Rendering Manager, not the other DRM