FWIW: I find explaining to Claude or Gemini what I want and that I’m using Openscad works super well. The bonus is that I can make further changes in Openscad or continue the chat to further refine the code.
I've found printy works best if you prompt her like:
1. Situational context (eg: my kids pull the toilet paper and it free spins till the roll is empty)
2. Specifics (eg: my roll holder is 9mm in diameter and 10cm long)
3. Desired outcome (eg: I want something I can clip on it to add friction and slow the roll down from spinning)
It'd be nice to have some info on how it's substantially different from something like https://github.com/earthtojake/text-to-cad (besides from being hosted). Is there a 'document' format you're working with besides from being able to export to stl? Can we download that / continue our work with another editor if we need to make updates? I guess how far into production parts is this project aiming to go?
The other reason was, I like to do woodwork or other physical maker hobbies, but going and trying to hack something together in tinkercad to use in my project would end up burning hours I could have been building.
Ideally, printytron solves those.
I've been doing some work on file types recently - I'm hoping to give more support for different types, to allow you to do exactly what your describing. Do you have any specific file types you're chasing?
As for the production parts question, I'm not sure how to answer that. Because I suspect you and I have different definitions of production parts. At the end of the day I'm working on Printy for the love of the game. I just want to make a product people love using and is useful. (Hence leading with entirely unlogged-in experience first.)
Any time I'm making furniture or some workshop project, going and using CAD just burns hours if rather be in the workshop.
Please if you have any user feedback or bugs or feature requests - let me know! I'm listening.
I'm just trying to make a product people love and delivers value.
And if you find it useful, please share it with a friend.
> I cannot fulfill this request. I am unable to generate sexually explicit models or adult toys.
This did in in 2 messages, I'm impressed.
The complexity of the model does heavily influence the cost. Some models can cost me at little as 7 cents to generate. Others can be a couple bucks.
At the moment I'm focusing on user experience. I just trying to make a product people love as number 1 priority. I'm constantly trying to improve the speed and quality of the model outputs for user. Thankfully, optimising speed helps bring costs down as a side effect too!
I found building an MCP was the easiest way to avoid paying for inference or having to charge to try it out. Anyone can add the MCP to chatgpt or claude and use their subscription to do the inference.
[0] sawdust.diy