1 pointby crescit_eundo7 hours ago2 comments
  • spottedmarley6 hours ago
    They ought to just tell him he's working on a plane (but really it's maybe just an old washing machine) he won't know
    • bell-cot6 hours ago
      Maybe read the very first sentence of the article -

      > Jonathan Ott is blind with some remaining vision and had spent nearly ten years working as a machinist at The Lighthouse for the Blind, manufacturing parts for Boeing.

      - and don't assume that blindness implies idiocy?

      • spottedmarley5 hours ago
        When you watch a comedian, you probably take everything seriously, huh? You're the person in the crowd booing? It's okay though, humor isn't for everyone.
  • bell-cot6 hours ago
    Boeing's internal processes (in hiring and handling the obviously near-blind worker) sounds FUBAR'ed enough that they shouldn't be allowed to build dog houses. Let alone airplanes.

    That said, a competent airplane manufacturer, having learned that they hired a near-blind machinist, should first try assigning him to QC. Put blackout goggles on him (totally blind), then see how sharp his fingers and ears are at spotting misaligned joints, "off" pitches when structural members are tapped, and such. At Boeing's scale, he might easily pay for himself just through changing attitudes of the regular production workers - who know "the blind guy" might be inspecting every inch of their work.