67 pointsby adius8 hours ago5 comments
  • fhn4 hours ago
    Does this have a web-based playground? I find https://www.pythonscad.org/playground/ to be nice to try out the project.
    • adius4 hours ago
      Agreed! I’m already working on it, but it’s not quite ready yet. ETA is 1-2 weeks.
  • tolugenius6 hours ago
    Really interesting! I actually use freecad so I'm use to that layer of the process but I'll check this out. Also good to see the work being done in modeling software these days
  • manny_rat6 hours ago
    Love it! OpenSCAD has very painful syntax. Is it possible to easily do bevels/chamfers or does it have the same limitations as OpenSCAD there?
    • adius6 hours ago
      Thanks! It natively supports all BOSL2 functions which include a chamfer argument (https://github.com/revarbat/BOSL/wiki#common-arguments). So that makes it quite straightforward to add chamfers to everything!
      • kragen4 hours ago
        Can you fillet unions? Like, if I union a cube with a smaller cube sticking out of its side, can I make a fillet so that the edge where the two cubes' faces intersect doesn't become a stress concentration point for cracks to start at? This is OpenSCAD's primary weakness from my point of view.
      • addaon6 hours ago
        Which is what separates us from the animals.
      • adastra224 hours ago
        Quite easy to add chamfers to everything in the CAD file. But your manufacturing guy is going to strangle you...
  • WillAdams6 hours ago
    Is it able to access the file system and write/read files?

    I've been doing that via PythonSCAD for my current project https://github.com/WillAdams/gcodepreview and it might be interesting to do a re-write in another language.

    • adius6 hours ago
      Yes, it executes in a full fledged Lua environment. So you can do all the things you expect do be able to do with Lua!

      I’d pick Lua over Python any day, but maybe that’s just me. ;-)

      • WillAdams5 hours ago
        I've had good success w/ using Lua in LuaLaTeX, so hopefully a good fit for me to exercise my programming chops. I think it will be interesting to maintain two parallel versions for comparison/contrast. Thanks!
  • adastra224 hours ago
    Isn't OpenSCAD's limited (non-Turing complete) language a feature?
    • adius3 hours ago
      I'm pretty sure it's Turing complete by now. If it was conceptualized as a limited language and only became a full fledged programming language over time, it would certainly explain all its weird warts. (Here is some more details: https://github.com/ad-si/LuaCAD#why-lua) I guess 3D modeling is just too complex for a simple, but limited DSL.

      Lua is easier to use, faster, and more feature-rich. It's one of those rare occasions when a new solution is actually better in every single way.