20 pointsby u1hcw9nx3 hours ago3 comments
  • pjc503 hours ago
    Personally I think governments shouldn't just be able to order people killed, but that's just a European view.

    (really the difference between the constitutional law approach which only protects US citizens and the human rights approach of ECHR which protects humans)

    • an hour ago
      undefined
    • bigwheela minute ago
      [dead]
  • herbst3 hours ago
    I mean we all knew the US is bombing innocent fisher man outside their jurisdiction. That is exactly what central European media seemed to agree on.

    We still miss the "why" and how there are no consequences so far

    • davikr17 minutes ago
      My fishermen also ride around in speedboats rocking $120,000 worth of engines filled to the brim with mysterious blue packages.
    • Sha1rholderan hour ago
      Frogs being boiled—public has gotten used to it, even numb.
    • vrganj43 minutes ago
      Why did Russia complain about the rights of the Russian minority in Ukraine?

      Why did Austria send Serbia an Ultimatum in 1914?

      Why did Japanese officers blow up their own railway in Manchuria in 1931?

      Why was Spain blamed for an accidental explosion on the USS Maine in 1898?

    • fragmede2 hours ago
      But what if that fisherman possibly thought about the existence of illegal narcotics while on the boat, fishing? That's grounds for getting murdered, right?
      • codedokodean hour ago
        What if a son of a senator or a president had drugs, would he be bombed too?