US vs. UK Baby Names 2025: The Biggest Top Differences Visualized(namedaisy.com)

10 pointsby xoobdev3 hours ago5 comments

tobylane2 hours ago
I'd like to know whether names are popular because of their theme, eg biblical, or a famous namesake. Parents aren't asked, so there's no real data.
- spwa42 hours ago
  The top one in the UK is Muhammad. Do you really have to ask?
  - tobylanean hour ago
    > The US list also favors a newer wave of ancient biblical names that only gained real traction in recent decades, giving them a more modern feel despite their centuries of history. Levi, Asher, Ezra, Josiah, Ezekiel, Silas, Adriel and Micah all rank in the American top 100 for boys. Some of these revivals are shared favorites, including Noah, Elijah, Isaac, Caleb and Ezra, and Delilah and Eden for girls.
    From the article, plus the two UK biblical names Jude and Reuben. For the UK, I think most of these are second-order, if that is the right way to describe appreciating a name without using it for the same reason as the parents being copied.
  - karmakurtisaani2 hours ago
    That's just one of the names and doesn't give a very good overall picture.
    WithinReasonan hour ago
    It's three of the names
    karmakurtisaani25 minutes ago
    So you think those three slight variations of the same name have essentially different reasoning behind naming kids like that?
Schlagbohrer2 hours ago
Not as many Kieliegh or Braieghlinn as I feared
jedbrooke2 hours ago
Sorry to be the guy on HN complaining about scrolljacking on the article, but this has to be one of the worst I’ve seen. Text is cut off near the bottom of the description, but if I scroll down to see it, it jumps to the next “slide” and I am unable to read it :(
(on a iphone 11)
- xoobdev2 hours ago
  Ah thanks for letting me know, this is the first time I've tried a scrolling UI (I'm not usually a fan) so have some work to do on getting that right
jpfromlondon2 hours ago
what surprises and annoys me is Briton's willingness to name their children shortened versions of existing names, it's lazy, so many Archies and Alfies, ugh.
- wdutch2 hours ago
  I also have an aversion to this. But I'm not sure how you conclude that it's lazy?
  - jpfromlondonan hour ago
    aren't contractions lazy by nature?
    Regardless, I'm glad you're averse.
- drcongoan hour ago
  The #23 boys name in the US is John.
  - roryirvinean hour ago
    And #15 is Jack, so the US also does this.
    (Mind you, the UK is still worse - Jack is #19 but John isn't even on the list)
    jpfromlondonan hour ago
    Leo, Freddie, Theo, etc.
    roryirvinean hour ago
    Yeah, I'm surprised. I'd always assumed that people would use the full form on the birth certificate even if the child was never actually called that in practice.
    Doesn't really matter, I suppose - names are pretty arbitrary anyway and I can't imagine the sort of pain that would be involved in trying to force-canonicalise Jack->John, Leo->Leonard, Theo->Theodore (or Theobald?). Even the French don't do that any more!
codeduck2 hours ago
why are you resubmitting something you submitted 78 days ago?
- xoobdev2 hours ago
  It's on the same site (I'm the creator of the site), but it's a totally separate blog post that I made this week