38 pointsby tapper13 hours ago2 comments
  • GuestFAUniverse3 hours ago
    Thank your ancestors, who were to lazy to recycle and treat the rest in a thermic process upfront. It bet those landfills could have easily been only one third the size and close to non-toxic.

    When generations cheap out, it's always one of the next who suffers. Pains me.

    • cucumber373284213 minutes ago
      >Thank your ancestors, who were to lazy to recycle and treat the rest in a thermic process upfront. It bet those landfills could have easily been only one third the size and close to non-toxic.

      My municipality (not in CA but a state of a similar bent) is actively looking at how w're gonna get screwed over this right now as our landfill is slated to close in the mid to late 2030s.

      There's plenty of idiots alive and affecting policy today who are why we can't come up with solutions. It's a giant goddamn circle of stupid.

      Can't landfill it "because environment". Can't burn it "because environment". Can't have the local (because all this stuff is low margin and shipping eats margin) industry that could take a whole lot of this stuff as various feed stocks "because environment". Of course the lying assholes will be right there to tell you that they haven't literally banned X or Y, you just need to comply with requirements that they've carefully written so that there's not actually any suitable site for a new landfill or incineration/power operation in the whole state.

      Clearly the only truly sustainable solution is one that doesn't involve listening to certain people.

  • aaron6955 hours ago
    [dead]