83 pointsby Thorondor3 hours ago7 comments
  • sdenton4a few seconds ago
    Here's a direct link to the video, to avoid the blogspam cruft...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Co57SfcT-h0

  • emptybits29 minutes ago
    His trebuchet launched a 4 gram projectile at 776 miles per hour.

    That's obviously extremely lightweight for trebuchet payload, but for comparison, his projectile is approximately 62 grains so approximately twice as heavy as 30 grain high speed 22LR rounds. And approximately 1.5 times as heavy as 40 grain subsonic rounds.

  • MomsAVoxell2 hours ago
    Seems like such an advance in this ancient technology. It would be really cool to see it applied in interesting ways.

    I really wonder just how effective this could be as a defense system .. the mind wanders with every update Tom makes .. I imagine an aiming/targetting system would make this an effective, easily replenished, low-resource weapon system for some applications. Attacking feral animals, perhaps?

    How could an auto-loader work for this .. I'm sure there's a means.

    Another thing that I keep thinking about, is whether this would be an effective way to launch seed-bombs, or deal with avalanche conditions on a mountain without requiring fire-arms training.

    A truly fascinating bit of engineering. I hope to see it evolve into an effective delivery mechanism.

    • nkrisc4 minutes ago
      I don’t think this has much practical application as an entire system. Nor is it supposed to. It was built just to achieve and artificial goal with arbitrary constraints. That doesn’t make it any less cool or interesting, but that doesn’t make it useful.

      Some of the features he used are pretty cool though, like varying the winding drum diameter to vary the delivered torque over the course of the weight drop.

    • monster_truck12 minutes ago
      All of these things are thoroughly solved problems with embarrassing levels of cost effectiveness, far from interesting.

      Please keep your thinly veiled murder fantasies to yourself

    • toasty22815 minutes ago
      Or we can just accept it as a cool gimmick, we don't have to kill animals with supersonic trebuchets really
    • gattran hour ago
      I also loved the video. But I'd think if one wanted to deploy "simple" mechanical projectile weapons at scale, pneumatic launchers would be easier, more compact and more reliable (way less cool-looking and operating, though!).
      • monster_truck9 minutes ago
        Basically anyone can go buy a pellet rifle that will easily and consistently clear 1500fps. They're still pretty cool, and will go through both doors of a car
      • genewitchan hour ago
        like a potato cannon?

        I helped design the "reloadable" part of a golf-ball shooter that used acetylene as the accelerant. I don't think it went supersonic, though. There's videos (embarassing ones) on youtube. He eventually designed one that can shoot full cans of monster energy hundreds of yards.

        the reason i bring it up is we used to design and build pneumatic ones, that could send C and D batteries thousands of feet if you arced it right. that was with ~125psi, we always wanted to build out to 200+ psi, but instead went into accelerant-based cannons and he got a job doing machine drawing with autocad. the rest is history.

        edit: https://nextcloud.projectftm.com/index.php/s/cobra5x we show off the part i designed, toward the end on the "reload" - he designed and built the entire thing.

      • MomsAVoxellan hour ago
        I dunno, takes a lot of energy to get a pneumatic system up to the same speeds that this trebuchet can accomplish. I see it really as a super-efficient machine requiring very little effort to load ..

        But yeah, the fact that it's super cool looking - and sounding - is a key factor in my willingness to play with one too, one day. ;)

    • zellyn41 minutes ago
      Drone defense? :-)
  • daemonologist2 hours ago
    Also (mentioned by Tom), this elastic-powered supersonic trebuchet is an excellent video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gdXOS-B0Bus
    • genewitchan hour ago
      the "shot you've been waiting for" was sort of anticlimactic, but the two plywood arm shots after show what it actually sounds like. I think the grass and tree dulled the sound a lot on the metal arm.

      I actually have a camera that can shoot that at high speed (1200fps), but i'm sure other people have better cameras these days, mine has very low resolution.

      • bookofjoe37 minutes ago
        Scientific research systems like the SCARF achieve 156.3 trillion fps but at greatly reduced spatial resolutions.
  • hinkley2 hours ago
    How do you responsibly test something like this? The payload isn't going to follow a ballistic trajectory, it's going to follow an aerodynamic one. You'd probably have to design something special to load into it to aim the damned thing.

    Which is a road trip to some place very empty in something like a 180º arc. Maybe 225º.

    • myself24830 minutes ago
      Very early in the video, he explains that while previous builds used steel ball-bearings, that's not responsible at these energy levels, so he switches to lightweight balls made of biodegradable plastic. There's comparatively little energy in the projectile after release, and it's only supersonic for a few feet.

      Further, you test in an enormous empty field, as he's doing.

    • RevEngan hour ago
      He explains that the field he is shooting towards is over 5km of empty field. He also started his tests with much lower weight and speed to ensure proper behavior before getting up to full speed.
    • dofman hour ago
      He has fairly specific mechanically timed release control over it — within 0.5 degrees.

      But he also used an extremely lightweight ball projectile — a few grams of 3D printed plastic — because he was only interested in the launch speed. And he pointed it in a direction where there were no people for miles.

    • thot_experimentan hour ago
      It's shooting 3d printed balls, I imagine they don't stay supersonic for very long. Significantly less dangerous to others than driving a car.
      • hinkleyan hour ago
        You'll shoot your eye out, kid.
        • thot_experiment12 minutes ago
          It's absurdist to be concerned about this and be okay driving a car from a total harm to society perspective.
  • felooboolooombaan hour ago
    This guy absolutely amazing to watch. He also has a 2nd channel that I only found out a few weeks ago: https://www.youtube.com/@TimStation
    • noman-landan hour ago
      Not only is it a funny name it also appears in my subscriptions list alphabetically right below the main channel.
  • ungreased06752 hours ago
    Projects like this are inspiring. Love it.

    I should build something this weekend…