But to really check how good they are, I use the idea of a failed startup.
I used Fast's idea of one-click checkouts in another idea validator tool, and the tool gave it a really high score, which is not a good sign.
Did the same here, and it gave a score of 38/100 and tagged it a high-risk business, which is a good sign.
And to my surprise, the tool also mentioned Fast as a failed startup, so I think your tool is good.
Bad thing is I can only try one idea in the free tier.
Thank you for your feedback though. I encourage you to run a good idea to really see the capability of this.
Here is my take:It scored the idea 52/100.
What I liked: Nell recognised the problem is real and growing, but did not treat that alone as proof of a fundable company. It pointed out that the technical, legal, and distribution questions are still unresolved.
Something that stood out: The most useful part was the recommendation to narrow the idea to one scam type, such as “grandparent scam” calls, choose one distribution channel, and interview 20 families before building.
Where it lacked: It raised a risk: Apple, Google, or telecom carriers could build this directly into call-screening. But i can also sell my solution to these companies. Tbh, if someone builds such a product, they would first like to sell it to telecom service providers.