5 pointsby xhrpost7 hours ago3 comments
  • stevenalowe5 hours ago
    EA has been saddled with a heavy load on their way to the bottom. Private equity firms are not known for their innovation or longevity
  • steveBK1237 hours ago
    This compares to ~$200M in dividends they were paying while a public company
    • bigbadfeline2 hours ago
      "All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others"
  • bell-cot7 hours ago
    You know you're old when...you feel an instant disbelief that anyone with $18B to lend could actually believe mere 10% interest was sufficient compensation for the risk of default here.
    • klaff6 hours ago
      Having worked at a company that became saddled with huge debt, I am leaning to look at this the other way. The bank(s), in cooperation with the buyers, found a target to extract money from. The goal for them may not be long term health of the company but to suck as much out of it as they can without immediately killing it until eventually there's nothing left.
    • Ekaros6 hours ago
      I have become cynical. I am starting to believe that there is a lot of fund managers who do not are not doing their best for their clients but instead of their own bonuses. From that viewpoint everything starts to make lot more sense. Out-sized returns when there is not risk for person deciding on investment.

      It is easy to rope in gullible who want those big returns. And the game has been run for years now. On paper things looked or maybe still look good. Reality is probably lot worse.