65 pointsby 16594470916 hours ago9 comments
  • tomkarho5 hours ago
    End of an era. Who do we vote as the worst company ever now?
    • vunderba5 hours ago
      Well at least as far as gaming companies go, Blizzard always seems willing to throw its hat in the ring.
      • d3Xt3r5 hours ago
        In spite of all the hate, I like that Blizzard's games don't use super nasty DRMs (like Denuvo, which EA, Ubisoft and many others use), all their games work perfectly under Linux (Wine/Proton), and they still host live download links to a game that's nearly three decades old (Diablo 2). Like literally yesterday I set up a new Linux laptop and was about to install Project Diablo 2 under Steam, and was pleasantly surprised to see that the HTTP links to the original D2 and D2 LoD setups were still alive, and the Win 9x-era downloader+installer still works just fine. I mean, how cool is that. And I could even log into battle.net and retrieve my CD keys too. For a 26yr old game.
    • snowram4 hours ago
      EA being voted as the worst company has always been funny to me. The world would be a far better place if it was indeed the case.
      • thefz3 hours ago
        The gaming community likes to be extremely dramatic.
    • Aardwolf5 hours ago
      I guess it'll keep existing with the name EA? "Public investment fund" doesn't sound too fitting for a game company
    • oliwarner4 hours ago
      I'm not sure they're even the worst games company. Ubisoft would give them a run for their money but that's a $30 DLC over a $70 base price I refused to pay for.

      No, EA earn every criticism and this move to PE will do absolutely nothing to improve their business practices.

    • gspr5 hours ago
      Won't Saudi ownership of something bad make it even worse? The era goes on!
      • hurfdurf5 hours ago
        Grave danger of integer overflow (underflow?).
    • inigyou2 hours ago
      Palantir? Flock?
    • LocalH5 hours ago
      I disagree. They're not gonna give up the brand recognition to rename it. They specifically wanted "Electronic Arts". EA has Battlefield, FIFA, The Sims, and Madden. Those four alone are probably responsible for 90% of the company's revenue.

      If anything, now you can say that EA is doubly the worst company, especially in gaming.

      • krige5 hours ago
        EA lost FIFA a few years ago. The games are now "FC". They still sell though.
        • croes5 hours ago
          They didn’t lose FIFA, they let go. FIFA lost EA
        • LocalH5 hours ago
          Shit. I had a feeling I was fucking up on one of those. The other three are still massive franchises, though.
          • hurfdurf4 hours ago
            Another big one is College Football, at least in the US. And in the latest edition they nerfed the offline single-player mode's XP progression. In return they added microtransactions to buy XP points. For offline single-player. Gachaification continues.
  • rockskon6 hours ago
    What a waste of Saudi money.
    • bestouff6 hours ago
      It's not a financial investment. They're buying influence.
      • nick4865 hours ago
        >They're buying influence.

        Buying EA for influence? With the reputation EA has in gaming? They're a joke - they're not influencing anything. Its like buying a violin to fix a flat tire.

        • gambiting5 hours ago
          >>With the reputation EA has in gaming?

          Do you think your average EA Sports FC or Battlefield player is even aware of that reputation? These games still sell tens of million of copies. Positive influence in Battlefield alone would be huge.

        • charcircuit5 hours ago
          >They're a joke

          They are known for making games that sell to a mass audience and monetizing them well.

          It's like calling McDonald's a joke. It doesn't take away that they are a successful business affecting many people in the world.

          • Morromist5 hours ago
            I agree they're good at making games that sell to a mass audience - but I really think that a lot of franchises have wasted a ton of money partnering with EA, which makes poor quality games that are exactly the same as the one they printed out 12 months ago. I haven't heard anyone talking about an EA sports game since the PS1 era and they seem to have completely missed the e-sports era where DOTA and Fortnight made vast sums of money. Don't get me wrong, they've made a ton of money, but I think they could have made still far more in more competant hands.

            Fabulously greedy FIFA seems to have realized this and is no longer partnering with them.

            • Jach5 hours ago
              News to me about FIFA. SA has been trying to gain "influence" in sports overall, and their video game endeavors also seem focused on "e-sports" more than gaming as a whole. I frequently hear complaints about them in fighting game circles, which is a more niche segment of "e-sports". EA is a big step up even if it's not DOTA/LoL levels.
              • Morromist4 hours ago
                Yeah. Actually it looks to me like FIFA jumped the gun a bit. They stopped letting EA making their games in 2023, but then choaked and have only released two not-great looking games seemingly meant for low end systems like phones and the Nintendo Switch. I doubt either sold as well as the EA FIFA games.

                I'll bet they lost a lot of money - I'm sure there's an interesting story about FIFA's efforts to get their own game development up and running. I guess they wanted EA to pay $300 million per year and EA said no, but I doubt FIFA made 50 million on the games they released.

            • tayo424 hours ago
              If you havent heard of people playing ea sports games since ps1 you're in a bubble.
          • nick4865 hours ago
            Yes, and buying McDonald's to influence anything would be a joke too. In fact EA is the McD of gaming, thats a perfect metaphor.

            If you want influence, there are waaay better value propositions.

            • sodastar2 hours ago
              actually not. EA is a household name. You can ask every single person with a steam/xbox/psn account if they know ea. i guarantee you, 95% of them heard of EA and id say 80% of those have played an EA game in their lifetime.

              That being said, influencing happens by mere exposure. There was a time, when Europeans bought up the kit of a bad mexican football club, just because the jersey was hyped on fifa 14. so if someone is trying to influence them, it will happen.

          • krige5 hours ago
            If they sold games and were well monetized (not to be confused with heavily monetized), they wouldn't be in this situation in the first place.
          • DimmieMan5 hours ago
            The 'core gamer' bubble has always been bad for this.

            Sports games sell like hotcakes and have people buy them every year religiously but you never hear about them, sims too. Their other titles were heavy hitters.

            Their just a seperate audience; EA certainly has influence, just not with people that talk about games.

            • rockskon4 hours ago
              Cultural influence though?

              Are you going to have MAGA Madden?

              The Socialist League?

        • ReactiveJelly5 hours ago
          They make all the sports games. Have you noticed all the sports and Mr. Beast type slop that's like "Wow and here we are inn Dubai / Saudi Arabia whatever and it's beautiful and luxurious and we're driving in Lambos waooowww"

          If product placement didn't work it wouldn't be an industry

      • BLKNSLVR4 hours ago
        So we can expect Battlefield: Iran sometime soon?

        Starting the propaganda for a ground invasion. I wonder if this one one of the crowd-sourced ideas submitted to the DoD?

        • sph4 hours ago
          What do you mean ‘starting the propagand’? It already was a propaganda vehicle, but it will not be the US behind it this time.
      • kidfiji5 hours ago
        Didn't realize gameswashing was a thing like sportswashing, but here we are
      • gmerc6 hours ago
        This. See Bobby Kotik and the Epstein files.
  • krige5 hours ago
    Because the Saudis leveraged this buyout via a massive loan from JP Morgan, EA's debt is now 10 times higher than it was when it was a publicly traded company: $2.2b to $22b.

    Turns out the notion that they wouldn’t need humans to make games and they would use AI for most things was a pipe dream and firing staff to be profitable with the huge loan didn't work.

    Now they are fucked.

    Every company that spends money to buy up companies died and goes defunct because they keep failing to realize that they have to keep spending loads of money to make money and it doesn’t just roll in after acquiring IPs. Not even mobile slop or live service can save them anymore.

    • neilfrndes5 hours ago
      Bending Spoons seems to be doing fine
      • krige5 hours ago
        I meant in the videogame industry.
    • whatever15 hours ago
      Fuck this corrupt system.

      You want to buy a company? Bring your own fucking money. Why do we have to pay for this shit?

      • hgomersall5 hours ago
        What? This is JP Morgan on the hook for it if the loan goes bad.
        • tgv5 hours ago
          You'll have to pay for it anyway. Games will get more expensive, there'll be more micro-transactions, etc. The investors as well as JP Morgan want their money back.
          • zdc14 hours ago
            I wouldn't be so quick to assume the capital structure of a company influences its product decisions. Lots of well-funded, publicly traded companies are also screwing their customers for the sake of short-term revenue.

            Want better games? Find them. Support the smaller studios and indie devs that produce quality, or contribute to a FOSS one.

          • whatever14 hours ago
            Realistically EA will never financially recover from this in its current form. Likely they will carve out 1-2 portions of it they can resell and the rest will die.
        • whatever15 hours ago
          No the taxpayer is. We paid the subprime mortgage bill. We will pay the private equity leverage bill too.
        • lazide5 hours ago
          Too big to fail eh? Do you really think if it blows up, the public won’t get sucked in?
  • LarsDu885 hours ago
    Does this mean we'll finally get a new Sim City?
    • Morromist5 hours ago
      You'll take Skylines 2 and you'll like it.
      • jredwards4 hours ago
        I do like it.
        • Morromist3 hours ago
          Me too actually. Its enormously better than any of the sim cities, especially the last one.
    • sph4 hours ago
      Are you that eager to give your money to the Saudis and Kushner?

      There’s a whole world of gaming out there.

    • johanvts5 hours ago
      SimCopter really should have priority IMO.
      • waste_monk5 hours ago
        Don't @ me until they bring back Sid Meier's SimGolf
      • seattle_spring5 hours ago
        Bundled with a revived Streets of SimCity please and thank you
  • 2 hours ago
    undefined
  • _carbyau_6 hours ago
    Between Saudi and right wing influence it seems one publisher will be trying to influence social commentary.
  • lovich5 hours ago
    This is being bought by Affinity Partners, the same Kushner led group that’s trying to buy out FIFA?

    Is the Trump family just going to own all of our entertainment and military companies?

    • BLKNSLVR4 hours ago
      > Is the Trump family just going to own all of our entertainment and military companies?

      Are we the Bad Guys?

      Not any more. Now we're the Worse Guys.

  • thefz3 hours ago
    Ah private equity, the king midas of shit.
  • anal_reactor4 hours ago
    I thought I'd care more, but all EA is releasing nowadays is normie slop anyway, so yeah.